Theorem ifordc 3682

Description: Rewrite a disjunction in a conditional as two nested conditionals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ifordc	⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜑, 𝐴, if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵)))

Proof of Theorem ifordc

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		exmiddc 848	. 2 ⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑))
2		iftrue 3645	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐴)
3	2	orcs 747	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐴)
4		iftrue 3645	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜑, 𝐴, if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵)) = 𝐴)
5	3, 4	eqtr4d 2274	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜑, 𝐴, if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵)))
6		iffalse 3648	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → if(𝜑, 𝐴, if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵)) = if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵))
7		biorf 756	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)))
8	7	ifbid 3662	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵) = if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵))
9	6, 8	eqtr2d 2272	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜑, 𝐴, if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵)))
10	5, 9	jaoi 728	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑) → if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜑, 𝐴, if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵)))
11	1, 10	syl 14	1 ⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜑, 𝐴, if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∨ wo 720  DECID wdc 846   = wceq 1402  ifcif 3638

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 623  ax-in2 624  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-11 1559  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-ext 2220

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-dc 847  df-tru 1405  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-if 3639

This theorem is used by:  nninfwlpoimlemg  7515