| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > ifordc | GIF version | ||
| Description: Rewrite a disjunction in a conditional as two nested conditionals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| ifordc | ⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜑, 𝐴, if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵))) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | exmiddc 844 | . 2 ⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)) | |
| 2 | iftrue 3614 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐴) | |
| 3 | 2 | orcs 743 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵) = 𝐴) |
| 4 | iftrue 3614 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝜑, 𝐴, if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵)) = 𝐴) | |
| 5 | 3, 4 | eqtr4d 2267 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜑, 𝐴, if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵))) |
| 6 | iffalse 3617 | . . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → if(𝜑, 𝐴, if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵)) = if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵)) | |
| 7 | biorf 752 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))) | |
| 8 | 7 | ifbid 3631 | . . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵) = if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵)) |
| 9 | 6, 8 | eqtr2d 2265 | . . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜑, 𝐴, if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵))) |
| 10 | 5, 9 | jaoi 724 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑) → if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜑, 𝐴, if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵))) |
| 11 | 1, 10 | syl 14 | 1 ⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → if((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓), 𝐴, 𝐵) = if(𝜑, 𝐴, if(𝜓, 𝐴, 𝐵))) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ∨ wo 716 DECID wdc 842 = wceq 1398 ifcif 3607 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-in1 619 ax-in2 620 ax-io 717 ax-5 1496 ax-7 1497 ax-gen 1498 ax-ie1 1542 ax-ie2 1543 ax-8 1553 ax-11 1555 ax-4 1559 ax-17 1575 ax-i9 1579 ax-ial 1583 ax-i5r 1584 ax-ext 2213 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-dc 843 df-tru 1401 df-nf 1510 df-sb 1811 df-clab 2218 df-cleq 2224 df-clel 2227 df-if 3608 |
| This theorem is referenced by: nninfwlpoimlemg 7417 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |