![]() |
Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > nelrdva | GIF version |
Description: Deduce negative membership from an implication. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Nov-2017.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
nelrdva.1 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑥 ≠ 𝐵) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
nelrdva | ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | eqidd 2194 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 = 𝐵) | |
2 | eleq1 2256 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)) | |
3 | 2 | anbi2d 464 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))) |
4 | neeq1 2377 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝑥 ≠ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐵)) | |
5 | 3, 4 | imbi12d 234 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑥 ≠ 𝐵) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐵))) |
6 | nelrdva.1 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑥 ≠ 𝐵) | |
7 | 5, 6 | vtoclg 2820 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐵)) |
8 | 7 | anabsi7 581 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐵) |
9 | 8 | neneqd 2385 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝐵 = 𝐵) |
10 | 1, 9 | pm2.65da 662 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ∧ wa 104 = wceq 1364 ∈ wcel 2164 ≠ wne 2364 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-in1 615 ax-in2 616 ax-io 710 ax-5 1458 ax-7 1459 ax-gen 1460 ax-ie1 1504 ax-ie2 1505 ax-8 1515 ax-10 1516 ax-11 1517 ax-i12 1518 ax-bndl 1520 ax-4 1521 ax-17 1537 ax-i9 1541 ax-ial 1545 ax-i5r 1546 ax-ext 2175 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-tru 1367 df-nf 1472 df-sb 1774 df-clab 2180 df-cleq 2186 df-clel 2189 df-nfc 2325 df-ne 2365 df-v 2762 |
This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |