Theorem raldifb 3369

Description: Restricted universal quantification on a class difference in terms of an implication. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 3-Jan-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
raldifb	⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∉ 𝐵 → 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)𝜑)

Proof of Theorem raldifb

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		impexp 263	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∉ 𝐵) → 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∉ 𝐵 → 𝜑)))
2	1	bicomi 132	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∉ 𝐵 → 𝜑)) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∉ 𝐵) → 𝜑))
3		df-nel 2516	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∉ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)
4	3	anbi2i 461	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∉ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
5		eldif 3229	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
6	5	bicomi 132	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵))
7	4, 6	bitri 184	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∉ 𝐵) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵))
8	7	imbi1i 238	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∉ 𝐵) → 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) → 𝜑))
9	2, 8	bitri 184	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∉ 𝐵 → 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) → 𝜑))
10	9	ralbii2 2560	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∉ 𝐵 → 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)𝜑)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105   ∈ wcel 2209   ∉ wnel 2515  ∀wral 2528   ∖ cdif 3217

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 623  ax-in2 624  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-ext 2220

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1405  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-nel 2516  df-ral 2533  df-v 2823  df-dif 3222

This theorem is referenced by: (None)