Theorem raldifb 3344

Description: Restricted universal quantification on a class difference in terms of an implication. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 3-Jan-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
raldifb	⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∉ 𝐵 → 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)𝜑)

Proof of Theorem raldifb

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		impexp 263	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∉ 𝐵) → 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∉ 𝐵 → 𝜑)))
2	1	bicomi 132	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∉ 𝐵 → 𝜑)) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∉ 𝐵) → 𝜑))
3		df-nel 2496	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∉ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)
4	3	anbi2i 457	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∉ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
5		eldif 3206	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
6	5	bicomi 132	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵))
7	4, 6	bitri 184	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∉ 𝐵) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵))
8	7	imbi1i 238	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∉ 𝐵) → 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) → 𝜑))
9	2, 8	bitri 184	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∉ 𝐵 → 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) → 𝜑))
10	9	ralbii2 2540	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∉ 𝐵 → 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)𝜑)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105   ∈ wcel 2200   ∉ wnel 2495  ∀wral 2508   ∖ cdif 3194

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 617  ax-in2 618  ax-io 714  ax-5 1493  ax-7 1494  ax-gen 1495  ax-ie1 1539  ax-ie2 1540  ax-8 1550  ax-10 1551  ax-11 1552  ax-i12 1553  ax-bndl 1555  ax-4 1556  ax-17 1572  ax-i9 1576  ax-ial 1580  ax-i5r 1581  ax-ext 2211

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1398  df-nf 1507  df-sb 1809  df-clab 2216  df-cleq 2222  df-clel 2225  df-nfc 2361  df-nel 2496  df-ral 2513  df-v 2801  df-dif 3199

This theorem is referenced by: (None)