![]() |
Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > raldifb | GIF version |
Description: Restricted universal quantification on a class difference in terms of an implication. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 3-Jan-2018.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
raldifb | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∉ 𝐵 → 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)𝜑) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | impexp 259 | . . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∉ 𝐵) → 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∉ 𝐵 → 𝜑))) | |
2 | 1 | bicomi 130 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∉ 𝐵 → 𝜑)) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∉ 𝐵) → 𝜑)) |
3 | df-nel 2345 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∉ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) | |
4 | 3 | anbi2i 445 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∉ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) |
5 | eldif 2993 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
6 | 5 | bicomi 130 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)) |
7 | 4, 6 | bitri 182 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∉ 𝐵) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)) |
8 | 7 | imbi1i 236 | . . 3 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∉ 𝐵) → 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) → 𝜑)) |
9 | 2, 8 | bitri 182 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∉ 𝐵 → 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) → 𝜑)) |
10 | 9 | ralbii2 2382 | 1 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∉ 𝐵 → 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)𝜑) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ∧ wa 102 ↔ wb 103 ∈ wcel 1434 ∉ wnel 2344 ∀wral 2353 ∖ cdif 2981 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 104 ax-ia2 105 ax-ia3 106 ax-in1 577 ax-in2 578 ax-io 663 ax-5 1377 ax-7 1378 ax-gen 1379 ax-ie1 1423 ax-ie2 1424 ax-8 1436 ax-10 1437 ax-11 1438 ax-i12 1439 ax-bndl 1440 ax-4 1441 ax-17 1460 ax-i9 1464 ax-ial 1468 ax-i5r 1469 ax-ext 2065 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 115 df-tru 1288 df-nf 1391 df-sb 1688 df-clab 2070 df-cleq 2076 df-clel 2079 df-nfc 2212 df-nel 2345 df-ral 2358 df-v 2614 df-dif 2986 |
This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |