Theorem 2rbropap 5538

Description: Properties of a pair in a restricted binary relation 𝑀 expressed as an ordered-pair class abstraction: 𝑀 is the binary relation 𝑊 restricted by the conditions 𝜓 and 𝜏. (Contributed by AV, 31-Jan-2021.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
2rbropap.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 = {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓𝑊𝑝 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜏)})
2rbropap.2	⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑝 = 𝑃) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
2rbropap.3	⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑝 = 𝑃) → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
2rbropap	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝐹𝑀𝑃 ↔ (𝐹𝑊𝑃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑓,𝐹,𝑝   𝑃,𝑓,𝑝   𝑓,𝑊,𝑝   𝜒,𝑓,𝑝   𝜃,𝑓,𝑝

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑓, 𝑝)   𝜓(𝑓, 𝑝)   𝜏(𝑓, 𝑝)   𝑀(𝑓, 𝑝)   𝑋(𝑓, 𝑝)   𝑌(𝑓, 𝑝)

Proof of Theorem 2rbropap

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		2rbropap.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 = {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓𝑊𝑝 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜏)})
2		3anass 1111	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑓𝑊𝑝 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜏) ↔ (𝑓𝑊𝑝 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜏)))
3	2	opabbii 5171	. . . 4 ⊢ {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓𝑊𝑝 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜏)} = {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓𝑊𝑝 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜏))}
4	1, 3	eqtrdi 2811	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 = {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓𝑊𝑝 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜏))})
5		2rbropap.2	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑝 = 𝑃) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
6		2rbropap.3	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑝 = 𝑃) → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))
7	5, 6	anbi12d 644	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑝 = 𝑃) → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜏) ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)))
8	4, 7	rbropap 5537	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝐹𝑀𝑃 ↔ (𝐹𝑊𝑃 ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃))))
9		3anass 1111	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹𝑊𝑃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ↔ (𝐹𝑊𝑃 ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)))
10	8, 9	bitr4di 292	1 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝐹𝑀𝑃 ↔ (𝐹𝑊𝑃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2144   class class class wbr 5102  {copab 5166

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5248  ax-pr 5390

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-sb 2099  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-ss 3896  df-dif 4047  df-in 4091  df-un 4151  df-nul 4279  df-if 4482  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4835  df-br 5103  df-opab 5167

This theorem is used by:  iswlkon  30242