Theorem 0nelopab 5540

Description: The empty set is not an element of an ordered-pair class abstraction. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 5-Nov-2017.) Reduce axiom usage and shorten proof. (Revised by GG, 3-Oct-2024.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
0nelopab	⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}

Proof of Theorem 0nelopab

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		vex 3454	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
2		vex 3454	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
3	1, 2	opnzi 5443	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ≠ ∅
4	3	nesymi 3012	. . . . 5 ⊢ ¬ ∅ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩
5	4	intnanr 493	. . . 4 ⊢ ¬ (∅ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)
6	5	nex 1832	. . 3 ⊢ ¬ ∃𝑦(∅ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)
7	6	nex 1832	. 2 ⊢ ¬ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(∅ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)
8		elopab 5501	. 2 ⊢ (∅ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(∅ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
9	7, 8	mtbir 326	1 ⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1569  ∃wex 1811   ∈ wcel 2144  ∅c0 4277  ⟨cop 4834  {copab 5166

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5248  ax-pr 5391

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-sb 2099  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-ne 2956  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-ss 3897  df-dif 4046  df-in 4090  df-un 4150  df-nul 4278  df-if 4482  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4835  df-opab 5167

This theorem is used by:  brabv  5541  epelg  5552  satf0n0  36233  bj-0nelmpt  38146