Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next > Nearby theorems Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  axacndlem1 Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem axacndlem1 10036
 Description: Lemma for the Axiom of Choice with no distinct variable conditions. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2379. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
axacndlem1 (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(∀𝑥(𝑦𝑧𝑧𝑤) → ∃𝑤𝑦(∃𝑤((𝑦𝑧𝑧𝑤) ∧ (𝑦𝑤𝑤𝑥)) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑤)))

Proof of Theorem axacndlem1
StepHypRef Expression
1 nfae 2444 . . 3 𝑦𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦
2 nfae 2444 . . . 4 𝑧𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦
3 simpl 486 . . . . . 6 ((𝑦𝑧𝑧𝑤) → 𝑦𝑧)
43alimi 1813 . . . . 5 (∀𝑥(𝑦𝑧𝑧𝑤) → ∀𝑥 𝑦𝑧)
5 nd1 10016 . . . . . 6 (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑦𝑧)
65pm2.21d 121 . . . . 5 (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑥 𝑦𝑧 → ∃𝑤𝑦(∃𝑤((𝑦𝑧𝑧𝑤) ∧ (𝑦𝑤𝑤𝑥)) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑤)))
74, 6syl5 34 . . . 4 (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑥(𝑦𝑧𝑧𝑤) → ∃𝑤𝑦(∃𝑤((𝑦𝑧𝑧𝑤) ∧ (𝑦𝑤𝑤𝑥)) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑤)))
82, 7alrimi 2211 . . 3 (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑧(∀𝑥(𝑦𝑧𝑧𝑤) → ∃𝑤𝑦(∃𝑤((𝑦𝑧𝑧𝑤) ∧ (𝑦𝑤𝑤𝑥)) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑤)))
91, 8alrimi 2211 . 2 (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦𝑧(∀𝑥(𝑦𝑧𝑧𝑤) → ∃𝑤𝑦(∃𝑤((𝑦𝑧𝑧𝑤) ∧ (𝑦𝑤𝑤𝑥)) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑤)))
10919.8ad 2179 1 (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(∀𝑥(𝑦𝑧𝑧𝑤) → ∃𝑤𝑦(∃𝑤((𝑦𝑧𝑧𝑤) ∧ (𝑦𝑤𝑤𝑥)) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑤)))
 Colors of variables: wff setvar class Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 399  ∀wal 1536  ∃wex 1781 This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2175  ax-13 2379  ax-ext 2770  ax-sep 5171  ax-nul 5178  ax-pr 5299  ax-reg 9058 This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-or 845  df-tru 1541  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2070  df-clab 2777  df-cleq 2791  df-clel 2870  df-ral 3111  df-rex 3112  df-v 3444  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-nul 4247  df-sn 4529  df-pr 4531 This theorem is referenced by:  axacndlem4  10039  axacndlem5  10040
 Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator