P. 107 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 10601-10700   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	winaon 10601	A weakly inaccessible cardinal is an ordinal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Inaccw → 𝐴 ∈ On)
Theorem	inawinalem 10602*	Lemma for inawina 10603. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝒫 𝑥 ≺ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≺ 𝑦))
Theorem	inawina 10603	Every strongly inaccessible cardinal is weakly inaccessible. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Inacc → 𝐴 ∈ Inaccw)
Theorem	omina 10604	ω is a strongly inaccessible cardinal. (Many definitions of "inaccessible" explicitly disallow ω as an inaccessible cardinal, but this choice allows to reuse our results for inaccessibles for ω.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2014.)
⊢ ω ∈ Inacc
Theorem	winacard 10605	A weakly inaccessible cardinal is a cardinal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Inaccw → (card‘𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	winainflem 10606*	A weakly inaccessible cardinal is infinite. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ On ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≺ 𝑦) → ω ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	winainf 10607	A weakly inaccessible cardinal is infinite. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Inaccw → ω ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	winalim 10608	A weakly inaccessible cardinal is a limit ordinal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Inaccw → Lim 𝐴)
Theorem	winalim2 10609*	A nontrivial weakly inaccessible cardinal is a limit aleph. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Inaccw ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ω) → ∃𝑥((ℵ‘𝑥) = 𝐴 ∧ Lim 𝑥))
Theorem	winafp 10610	A nontrivial weakly inaccessible cardinal is a fixed point of the aleph function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Inaccw ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ω) → (ℵ‘𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	winafpi 10611	This theorem, which states that a nontrivial inaccessible cardinal is its own aleph number, is stated here in inference form, where the assumptions are in the hypotheses rather than an antecedent. Often, we use dedth 4537 to turn this type of statement into the closed form statement winafp 10610, but in this case, since it is consistent with ZFC that there are no nontrivial inaccessible cardinals, it is not possible to prove winafp 10610 using this theorem and dedth 4537, in ZFC. (You can prove this if you use ax-groth 10736, though.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Inaccw    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ≠ ω    ⇒   ⊢ (ℵ‘𝐴) = 𝐴
Theorem	gchina 10612	Assuming the GCH, weakly and strongly inaccessible cardinals coincide. Theorem 11.20 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 106. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (GCH = V → Inaccw = Inacc)
4.1.2  Weak universes
Syntax	cwun 10613	Extend class definition to include the class of all weak universes.
class WUni
Syntax	cwunm 10614	Extend class definition to include the map whose value is the smallest weak universe of which the given set is a subset.
class wUniCl
Definition	df-wun 10615*	The class of all weak universes. A weak universe is a nonempty transitive class closed under union, pairing, and powerset. The advantage of weak universes over Grothendieck universes is that one can prove that every set is contained in a weak universe in ZF (see uniwun 10653) whereas the analogue for Grothendieck universes requires ax-groth 10736 (see grothtsk 10748). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ WUni = {𝑢 ∣ (Tr 𝑢 ∧ 𝑢 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑢 (∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝒫 𝑥 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑢 {𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ 𝑢))}
Definition	df-wunc 10616*	A function that maps a set 𝑥 to the smallest weak universe that contains the elements of the set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ wUniCl = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ ∩ {𝑢 ∈ WUni ∣ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑢})
Theorem	iswun 10617*	Properties of a weak universe. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑈 ∈ WUni ↔ (Tr 𝑈 ∧ 𝑈 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 (∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝒫 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑈 {𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ 𝑈))))
Theorem	wuntr 10618	A weak universe is transitive. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝑈 ∈ WUni → Tr 𝑈)
Theorem	wununi 10619	A weak universe is closed under union. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	wunpw 10620	A weak universe is closed under powerset. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	wunelss 10621	The elements of a weak universe are also subsets of it. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑈)
Theorem	wunpr 10622	A weak universe is closed under pairing. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	wunun 10623	A weak universe is closed under binary union. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	wuntp 10624	A weak universe is closed under unordered triple. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	wunss 10625	A weak universe is closed under subsets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	wunin 10626	A weak universe is closed under binary intersections. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	wundif 10627	A weak universe is closed under class difference. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	wunint 10628	A weak universe is closed under nonempty intersections. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∩ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	wunsn 10629	A weak universe is closed under singletons. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴} ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	wunsuc 10630	A weak universe is closed under successors. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → suc 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	wun0 10631	A weak universe contains the empty set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∅ ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	wunr1om 10632	A weak universe is infinite, because it contains all the finite levels of the cumulative hierarchy. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅1 “ ω) ⊆ 𝑈)
Theorem	wunom 10633	A weak universe contains all the finite ordinals, and hence is infinite. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ⊆ 𝑈)
Theorem	wunfi 10634	A weak universe contains all finite sets with elements drawn from the universe. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	wunop 10635	A weak universe is closed under ordered pairs. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	wunot 10636	A weak universe is closed under ordered triples. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	wunxp 10637	A weak universe is closed under cartesian products. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	wunpm 10638	A weak universe is closed under partial mappings. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ↑pm 𝐵) ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	wunmap 10639	A weak universe is closed under mappings. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ↑m 𝐵) ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	wunf 10640	A weak universe is closed under functions with known domain and codomain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	wundm 10641	A weak universe is closed under the domain operator. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	wunrn 10642	A weak universe is closed under the range operator. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ran 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	wuncnv 10643	A weak universe is closed under the converse operator. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ◡𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	wunres 10644	A weak universe is closed under restrictions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	wunfv 10645	A weak universe is closed under the function value operator. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴‘𝐵) ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	wunco 10646	A weak universe is closed under composition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	wuntpos 10647	A weak universe is closed under transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → tpos 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)
Theorem	intwun 10648	The intersection of a collection of weak universes is a weak universe. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ WUni ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∩ 𝐴 ∈ WUni)
Theorem	r1limwun 10649	Each limit stage in the cumulative hierarchy is a weak universe. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Lim 𝐴) → (𝑅1‘𝐴) ∈ WUni)
Theorem	r1wunlim 10650	The weak universes in the cumulative hierarchy are exactly the limit ordinals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝑅1‘𝐴) ∈ WUni ↔ Lim 𝐴))
Theorem	wunex2 10651*	Construct a weak universe from a given set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (rec((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ ((𝑧 ∪ ∪ 𝑧) ∪ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ({𝒫 𝑥, ∪ 𝑥} ∪ ran (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ↦ {𝑥, 𝑦})))), (𝐴 ∪ 1o)) ↾ ω)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ∪ ran 𝐹    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑈 ∈ WUni ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑈))
Theorem	wunex 10652*	Construct a weak universe from a given set. See also wunex2 10651. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∃𝑢 ∈ WUni 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑢)
Theorem	uniwun 10653	Every set is contained in a weak universe. This is the analogue of grothtsk 10748 for weak universes, but it is provable in ZF without the Tarski-Grothendieck axiom, contrary to grothtsk 10748. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ ∪ WUni = V
Theorem	wunex3 10654	Construct a weak universe from a given set. This version of wunex 10652 has a simpler proof, but requires the axiom of regularity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑈 = (𝑅1‘((rank‘𝐴) +o ω))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑈 ∈ WUni ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑈))
Theorem	wuncval 10655*	Value of the weak universe closure operator. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (wUniCl‘𝐴) = ∩ {𝑢 ∈ WUni ∣ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑢})
Theorem	wuncid 10656	The weak universe closure of a set contains the set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ⊆ (wUniCl‘𝐴))
Theorem	wunccl 10657	The weak universe closure of a set is a weak universe. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (wUniCl‘𝐴) ∈ WUni)
Theorem	wuncss 10658	The weak universe closure is a subset of any other weak universe containing the set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ WUni ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑈) → (wUniCl‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝑈)
Theorem	wuncidm 10659	The weak universe closure is idempotent. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (wUniCl‘(wUniCl‘𝐴)) = (wUniCl‘𝐴))
Theorem	wuncval2 10660*	Our earlier expression for a containing weak universe is in fact the weak universe closure. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (rec((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ ((𝑧 ∪ ∪ 𝑧) ∪ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ({𝒫 𝑥, ∪ 𝑥} ∪ ran (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ↦ {𝑥, 𝑦})))), (𝐴 ∪ 1o)) ↾ ω)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = ∪ ran 𝐹    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (wUniCl‘𝐴) = 𝑈)
4.1.3  Tarski classes
Syntax	ctsk 10661	Extend class definition to include the class of all Tarski classes.
class Tarski
Definition	df-tsk 10662*	The class of all Tarski classes. Tarski classes is a phrase coined by Grzegorz Bancerek in his article Tarski's Classes and Ranks, Journal of Formalized Mathematics, Vol 1, No 3, May-August 1990. A Tarski class is a set whose existence is ensured by Tarski's Axiom A (see ax-groth 10736 and the equivalent axioms). Axiom A was first presented in Tarski's article Ueber unerreichbare Kardinalzahlen. Tarski introduced Axiom A to allow reasoning with inaccessible cardinals in ZFC. Later, Grothendieck introduced the concept of (Grothendieck) universes and showed they were exactly transitive Tarski classes. (Contributed by FL, 30-Dec-2010.)
⊢ Tarski = {𝑦 ∣ (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑦 𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑤) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝒫 𝑦(𝑧 ≈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))}
Theorem	eltskg 10663*	Properties of a Tarski class. (Contributed by FL, 30-Dec-2010.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑇 ∈ Tarski ↔ (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑇 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑇 ∧ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝑇 𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑤) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝒫 𝑇(𝑧 ≈ 𝑇 ∨ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑇))))
Theorem	eltsk2g 10664*	Properties of a Tarski class. (Contributed by FL, 30-Dec-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑇 ∈ Tarski ↔ (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑇 (𝒫 𝑧 ⊆ 𝑇 ∧ 𝒫 𝑧 ∈ 𝑇) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝒫 𝑇(𝑧 ≈ 𝑇 ∨ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑇))))
Theorem	tskpwss 10665	First axiom of a Tarski class. The subsets of an element of a Tarski class belong to the class. (Contributed by FL, 30-Dec-2010.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑇) → 𝒫 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑇)
Theorem	tskpw 10666	Second axiom of a Tarski class. The powerset of an element of a Tarski class belongs to the class. (Contributed by FL, 30-Dec-2010.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑇) → 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ 𝑇)
Theorem	tsken 10667	Third axiom of a Tarski class. A subset of a Tarski class is either equipotent to the class or an element of the class. (Contributed by FL, 30-Dec-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑇) → (𝐴 ≈ 𝑇 ∨ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑇))
Theorem	0tsk 10668	The empty set is a (transitive) Tarski class. (Contributed by FL, 30-Dec-2010.)
⊢ ∅ ∈ Tarski
Theorem	tsksdom 10669	An element of a Tarski class is strictly dominated by the class. JFM CLASSES2 th. 1. (Contributed by FL, 22-Feb-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑇) → 𝐴 ≺ 𝑇)
Theorem	tskssel 10670	A part of a Tarski class strictly dominated by the class is an element of the class. JFM CLASSES2 th. 2. (Contributed by FL, 22-Feb-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐴 ≺ 𝑇) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑇)
Theorem	tskss 10671	The subsets of an element of a Tarski class belong to the class. (Contributed by FL, 30-Dec-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑇)
Theorem	tskin 10672	The intersection of two elements of a Tarski class belongs to the class. (Contributed by FL, 30-Dec-2010.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑇) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑇)
Theorem	tsksn 10673	A singleton of an element of a Tarski class belongs to the class. JFM CLASSES2 th. 2 (partly). (Contributed by FL, 22-Feb-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑇) → {𝐴} ∈ 𝑇)
Theorem	tsktrss 10674	A transitive element of a Tarski class is a part of the class. JFM CLASSES2 th. 8. (Contributed by FL, 22-Feb-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ Tr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑇) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑇)
Theorem	tsksuc 10675	If an element of a Tarski class is an ordinal number, its successor is an element of the class. JFM CLASSES2 th. 6 (partly). (Contributed by FL, 22-Feb-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑇) → suc 𝐴 ∈ 𝑇)
Theorem	tsk0 10676	A nonempty Tarski class contains the empty set. (Contributed by FL, 30-Dec-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → ∅ ∈ 𝑇)
Theorem	tsk1 10677	One is an element of a nonempty Tarski class. (Contributed by FL, 22-Feb-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → 1o ∈ 𝑇)
Theorem	tsk2 10678	Two is an element of a nonempty Tarski class. (Contributed by FL, 22-Feb-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → 2o ∈ 𝑇)
Theorem	2domtsk 10679	If a Tarski class is not empty, it has more than two elements. (Contributed by FL, 22-Feb-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → 2o ≺ 𝑇)
Theorem	tskr1om 10680	A nonempty Tarski class is infinite, because it contains all the finite levels of the cumulative hierarchy. (This proof does not use ax-inf 9553.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → (𝑅1 “ ω) ⊆ 𝑇)
Theorem	tskr1om2 10681	A nonempty Tarski class contains the whole finite cumulative hierarchy. (This proof does not use ax-inf 9553.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → ∪ (𝑅1 “ ω) ⊆ 𝑇)
Theorem	tskinf 10682	A nonempty Tarski class is infinite. (Contributed by FL, 22-Feb-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → ω ≼ 𝑇)
Theorem	tskpr 10683	If 𝐴 and 𝐵 are members of a Tarski class, their unordered pair is also an element of the class. JFM CLASSES2 th. 3 (partly). (Contributed by FL, 22-Feb-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑇) → {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ 𝑇)
Theorem	tskop 10684	If 𝐴 and 𝐵 are members of a Tarski class, their ordered pair is also an element of the class. JFM CLASSES2 th. 4. (Contributed by FL, 22-Feb-2011.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑇) → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝑇)
Theorem	tskxpss 10685	A Cartesian product of two parts of a Tarski class is a part of the class. (Contributed by FL, 22-Feb-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑇) → (𝐴 × 𝐵) ⊆ 𝑇)
Theorem	tskwe2 10686	A Tarski class is well-orderable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (𝑇 ∈ Tarski → 𝑇 ∈ dom card)
Theorem	inttsk 10687	The intersection of a collection of Tarski classes is a Tarski class. (Contributed by FL, 17-Apr-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ Tarski ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∩ 𝐴 ∈ Tarski)
Theorem	inar1 10688	(𝑅1‘𝐴) for 𝐴 a strongly inaccessible cardinal is equipotent to 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Inacc → (𝑅1‘𝐴) ≈ 𝐴)
Theorem	r1omALT 10689	Alternate proof of r1om 10156, shorter as a consequence of inar1 10688, but requiring AC. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑅1‘ω) ≈ ω
Theorem	rankcf 10690	Any set must be at least as large as the cofinality of its rank, because the ranks of the elements of 𝐴 form a cofinal map into (rank‘𝐴). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-May-2013.)
⊢ ¬ 𝐴 ≺ (cf‘(rank‘𝐴))
Theorem	inatsk 10691	(𝑅1‘𝐴) for 𝐴 a strongly inaccessible cardinal is a Tarski class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Inacc → (𝑅1‘𝐴) ∈ Tarski)
Theorem	r1omtsk 10692	The set of hereditarily finite sets is a Tarski class. (The Tarski-Grothendieck Axiom is not needed for this theorem.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2013.)
⊢ (𝑅1‘ω) ∈ Tarski
Theorem	tskord 10693	A Tarski class contains all ordinals smaller than it. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ≺ 𝑇) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑇)
Theorem	tskcard 10694	An even more direct relationship than r1tskina 10695 to get an inaccessible cardinal out of a Tarski class: the size of any nonempty Tarski class is an inaccessible cardinal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → (card‘𝑇) ∈ Inacc)
Theorem	r1tskina 10695	There is a direct relationship between transitive Tarski classes and inaccessible cardinals: the Tarski classes that occur in the cumulative hierarchy are exactly at the strongly inaccessible cardinals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ((𝑅1‘𝐴) ∈ Tarski ↔ (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ 𝐴 ∈ Inacc)))
Theorem	tskuni 10696	The union of an element of a transitive Tarski class is in the set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ Tr 𝑇 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑇) → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑇)
Theorem	tskwun 10697	A nonempty transitive Tarski class is a weak universe. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ Tr 𝑇 ∧ 𝑇 ≠ ∅) → 𝑇 ∈ WUni)
Theorem	tskint 10698	The intersection of an element of a transitive Tarski class is an element of the class. (Contributed by FL, 17-Apr-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ Tr 𝑇) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∩ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑇)
Theorem	tskun 10699	The union of two elements of a transitive Tarski class is in the set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ Tr 𝑇) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑇) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑇)
Theorem	tskxp 10700	The Cartesian product of two elements of a transitive Tarski class is an element of the class. JFM CLASSES2 th. 67 (partly). (Contributed by FL, 15-Apr-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (((𝑇 ∈ Tarski ∧ Tr 𝑇) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑇) → (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ 𝑇)