Theorem bnj554 35228

Description: Technical lemma for bnj852 35250. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj554.19	⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑝))
bnj554.20	⊢ (𝜁 ↔ (𝑖 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑖))
bnj554.21	⊢ 𝐾 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐺‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
bnj554.22	⊢ 𝐿 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐺‘𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
bnj554.23	⊢ 𝐾 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐺‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
bnj554.24	⊢ 𝐿 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐺‘𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj554	⊢ ((𝜂 ∧ 𝜁) → ((𝐺‘𝑚) = 𝐿 ↔ (𝐺‘suc 𝑖) = 𝐾))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑦,𝐺   𝑦,𝑖   𝑦,𝑝

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜂(𝑦,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝜁(𝑦,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝐴(𝑦,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝐷(𝑦,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝑅(𝑦,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝐺(𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝐾(𝑦,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝐿(𝑦,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)

Proof of Theorem bnj554

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj554.19	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑝))
2	1	bnj1254 35138	. 2 ⊢ (𝜂 → 𝑚 = suc 𝑝)
3		bnj554.20	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜁 ↔ (𝑖 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑖))
4	3	simp3bi 1163	. 2 ⊢ (𝜁 → 𝑚 = suc 𝑖)
5		simpr 489	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑚 = suc 𝑝 ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑖) → 𝑚 = suc 𝑖)
6		bnj551 35072	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑚 = suc 𝑝 ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑖) → 𝑝 = 𝑖)
7		fveq2 6879	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑚 = suc 𝑖 → (𝐺‘𝑚) = (𝐺‘suc 𝑖))
8		fveq2 6879	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑝 = 𝑖 → (𝐺‘𝑝) = (𝐺‘𝑖))
9		iuneq1 4974	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐺‘𝑝) = (𝐺‘𝑖) → ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐺‘𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐺‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))
10		bnj554.24	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐿 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐺‘𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
11		bnj554.23	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐾 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐺‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
12	9, 10, 11	3eqtr4g 2829	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐺‘𝑝) = (𝐺‘𝑖) → 𝐿 = 𝐾)
13	8, 12	syl 18	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑝 = 𝑖 → 𝐿 = 𝐾)
14	7, 13	eqeqan12d 2783	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑚 = suc 𝑖 ∧ 𝑝 = 𝑖) → ((𝐺‘𝑚) = 𝐿 ↔ (𝐺‘suc 𝑖) = 𝐾))
15	5, 6, 14	syl2anc 595	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑚 = suc 𝑝 ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑖) → ((𝐺‘𝑚) = 𝐿 ↔ (𝐺‘suc 𝑖) = 𝐾))
16	2, 4, 15	syl2an 607	1 ⊢ ((𝜂 ∧ 𝜁) → ((𝐺‘𝑚) = 𝐿 ↔ (𝐺‘suc 𝑖) = 𝐾))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   ∧ w3a 1101   = wceq 1567   ∈ wcel 2149  ∪ ciun 4957  suc csuc 6359  ‘cfv 6533  ωcom 7858   ∧ w-bnj17 35016   predc-bnj14 35018

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1822  ax-4 1836  ax-5 1937  ax-6 1994  ax-7 2035  ax-8 2151  ax-9 2159  ax-ext 2741  ax-sep 5258  ax-pr 5402  ax-un 7730  ax-reg 9550

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1103  df-tru 1570  df-fal 1580  df-ex 1807  df-sb 2098  df-clab 2748  df-cleq 2761  df-clel 2844  df-ne 2965  df-ral 3086  df-rex 3096  df-rab 3424  df-v 3465  df-dif 3916  df-un 3918  df-in 3920  df-ss 3930  df-nul 4295  df-if 4490  df-pw 4566  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4874  df-iun 4959  df-br 5111  df-opab 5175  df-eprel 5559  df-fr 5612  df-suc 6363  df-iota 6489  df-fv 6541  df-bnj17 35017

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj558  35231