Theorem bnj554 34875

Description: Technical lemma for bnj852 34897. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj554.19	⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑝))
bnj554.20	⊢ (𝜁 ↔ (𝑖 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑖))
bnj554.21	⊢ 𝐾 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐺‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
bnj554.22	⊢ 𝐿 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐺‘𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
bnj554.23	⊢ 𝐾 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐺‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
bnj554.24	⊢ 𝐿 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐺‘𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj554	⊢ ((𝜂 ∧ 𝜁) → ((𝐺‘𝑚) = 𝐿 ↔ (𝐺‘suc 𝑖) = 𝐾))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑦,𝐺   𝑦,𝑖   𝑦,𝑝

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜂(𝑦,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝜁(𝑦,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝐴(𝑦,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝐷(𝑦,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝑅(𝑦,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝐺(𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝐾(𝑦,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)   𝐿(𝑦,𝑖,𝑚,𝑛,𝑝)

Proof of Theorem bnj554

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj554.19	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑝))
2	1	bnj1254 34785	. 2 ⊢ (𝜂 → 𝑚 = suc 𝑝)
3		bnj554.20	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜁 ↔ (𝑖 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑖))
4	3	simp3bi 1147	. 2 ⊢ (𝜁 → 𝑚 = suc 𝑖)
5		simpr 484	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑚 = suc 𝑝 ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑖) → 𝑚 = suc 𝑖)
6		bnj551 34718	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑚 = suc 𝑝 ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑖) → 𝑝 = 𝑖)
7		fveq2 6920	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑚 = suc 𝑖 → (𝐺‘𝑚) = (𝐺‘suc 𝑖))
8		fveq2 6920	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑝 = 𝑖 → (𝐺‘𝑝) = (𝐺‘𝑖))
9		iuneq1 5031	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐺‘𝑝) = (𝐺‘𝑖) → ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐺‘𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐺‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))
10		bnj554.24	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐿 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐺‘𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
11		bnj554.23	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐾 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐺‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)
12	9, 10, 11	3eqtr4g 2805	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐺‘𝑝) = (𝐺‘𝑖) → 𝐿 = 𝐾)
13	8, 12	syl 17	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑝 = 𝑖 → 𝐿 = 𝐾)
14	7, 13	eqeqan12d 2754	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑚 = suc 𝑖 ∧ 𝑝 = 𝑖) → ((𝐺‘𝑚) = 𝐿 ↔ (𝐺‘suc 𝑖) = 𝐾))
15	5, 6, 14	syl2anc 583	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑚 = suc 𝑝 ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑖) → ((𝐺‘𝑚) = 𝐿 ↔ (𝐺‘suc 𝑖) = 𝐾))
16	2, 4, 15	syl2an 595	1 ⊢ ((𝜂 ∧ 𝜁) → ((𝐺‘𝑚) = 𝐿 ↔ (𝐺‘suc 𝑖) = 𝐾))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1087   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2108  ∪ ciun 5015  suc csuc 6397  ‘cfv 6573  ωcom 7903   ∧ w-bnj17 34662   predc-bnj14 34664

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2711  ax-sep 5317  ax-nul 5324  ax-pr 5447  ax-un 7770  ax-reg 9661

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1778  df-nf 1782  df-sb 2065  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2819  df-ne 2947  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3077  df-rab 3444  df-v 3490  df-dif 3979  df-un 3981  df-in 3983  df-ss 3993  df-nul 4353  df-if 4549  df-pw 4624  df-sn 4649  df-pr 4651  df-op 4655  df-uni 4932  df-iun 5017  df-br 5167  df-opab 5229  df-eprel 5599  df-fr 5652  df-suc 6401  df-iota 6525  df-fv 6581  df-bnj17 34663

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj558  34878