Theorem bnj563 35240

Description: First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj563.19	⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑝))
bnj563.21	⊢ (𝜌 ↔ (𝑖 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑚 ≠ suc 𝑖))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj563	⊢ ((𝜂 ∧ 𝜌) → suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚)

Proof of Theorem bnj563

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj563.19	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜂 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑝))
2		bnj312 35209	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑝) ↔ (𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑝))
3		bnj252 35200	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑝) ↔ (𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑝)))
4	2, 3	bitri 278	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑝) ↔ (𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑝)))
5	4	simplbi 502	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑚 = suc 𝑝) → 𝑛 = suc 𝑚)
6	1, 5	sylbi 220	. 2 ⊢ (𝜂 → 𝑛 = suc 𝑚)
7		bnj563.21	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜌 ↔ (𝑖 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑚 ≠ suc 𝑖))
8	7	simp2bi 1164	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜌 → suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛)
9	7	simp3bi 1165	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜌 → 𝑚 ≠ suc 𝑖)
10	8, 9	jca 521	. 2 ⊢ (𝜌 → (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑚 ≠ suc 𝑖))
11		necom 3010	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑚 ≠ suc 𝑖 ↔ suc 𝑖 ≠ 𝑚)
12		eleq2 2851	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑛 = suc 𝑚 → (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ↔ suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑚))
13	12	biimpa 482	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛) → suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑚)
14		elsuci 6431	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑚 → (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚 ∨ suc 𝑖 = 𝑚))
15		orcom 884	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((suc 𝑖 = 𝑚 ∨ suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚) ↔ (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚 ∨ suc 𝑖 = 𝑚))
16		neor 3049	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((suc 𝑖 = 𝑚 ∨ suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚) ↔ (suc 𝑖 ≠ 𝑚 → suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚))
17	15, 16	bitr3i 280	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚 ∨ suc 𝑖 = 𝑚) ↔ (suc 𝑖 ≠ 𝑚 → suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚))
18	14, 17	sylib 221	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑚 → (suc 𝑖 ≠ 𝑚 → suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚))
19	18	imp 412	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((suc 𝑖 ∈ suc 𝑚 ∧ suc 𝑖 ≠ 𝑚) → suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚)
20	13, 19	stoic3 1809	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ suc 𝑖 ≠ 𝑚) → suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚)
21	11, 20	syl3an3b 1432	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑚 ≠ suc 𝑖) → suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚)
22	21	3expb 1138	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ∧ 𝑚 ≠ suc 𝑖)) → suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚)
23	6, 10, 22	syl2an 608	1 ⊢ ((𝜂 ∧ 𝜌) → suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∨ wo 861   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145   ≠ wne 2957  suc csuc 6363  ωcom 7865   ∧ w-bnj17 35183

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-ext 2734

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-ne 2958  df-v 3455  df-un 3907  df-sn 4588  df-suc 6367  df-bnj17 35184

This theorem is used by:  bnj570  35401