MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  elsuci Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem elsuci 6396
Description: Membership in a successor. This one-way implication does not require that either 𝐴 or 𝐵 be sets. Lemma 1.13 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-1994.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
elsuci (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 → (𝐴𝐵𝐴 = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem elsuci
StepHypRef Expression
1 df-suc 6333 . . . 4 suc 𝐵 = (𝐵 ∪ {𝐵})
21eleq2i 2829 . . 3 (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ {𝐵}))
3 elun 4107 . . 3 (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ {𝐵}) ↔ (𝐴𝐵𝐴 ∈ {𝐵}))
42, 3bitri 275 . 2 (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴𝐵𝐴 ∈ {𝐵}))
5 elsni 4599 . . 3 (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵} → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
65orim2i 911 . 2 ((𝐴𝐵𝐴 ∈ {𝐵}) → (𝐴𝐵𝐴 = 𝐵))
74, 6sylbi 217 1 (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 → (𝐴𝐵𝐴 = 𝐵))
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wo 848   = wceq 1542  wcel 2114  cun 3901  {csn 4582  suc csuc 6329
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-ext 2709
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-tru 1545  df-ex 1782  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2812  df-v 3444  df-un 3908  df-sn 4583  df-suc 6333
This theorem is referenced by:  suctr  6415  trsucss  6417  ordnbtwn  6422  suc11  6436  tfrlem11  8331  omordi  8505  nnmordi  8571  pssnn  9107  r1sdom  9700  cfsuc  10181  axdc3lem2  10375  axdc3lem4  10377  indpi  10832  constrmon  33928  bnj563  34926  bnj964  35125  ontgval  36653  onsucconni  36659  suctrALT  45210  suctrALT2VD  45220  suctrALT2  45221  suctrALTcf  45306  suctrALTcfVD  45307  suctrALT3  45308
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator