![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > elsuci | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Membership in a successor. This one-way implication does not require that either 𝐴 or 𝐵 be sets. Lemma 1.13 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-1994.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
elsuci | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | df-suc 6392 | . . . 4 ⊢ suc 𝐵 = (𝐵 ∪ {𝐵}) | |
2 | 1 | eleq2i 2831 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ {𝐵})) |
3 | elun 4163 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ {𝐵}) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵})) | |
4 | 2, 3 | bitri 275 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵})) |
5 | elsni 4648 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵} → 𝐴 = 𝐵) | |
6 | 5 | orim2i 910 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵}) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) |
7 | 4, 6 | sylbi 217 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∨ wo 847 = wceq 1537 ∈ wcel 2106 ∪ cun 3961 {csn 4631 suc csuc 6388 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1792 ax-4 1806 ax-5 1908 ax-6 1965 ax-7 2005 ax-8 2108 ax-9 2116 ax-ext 2706 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 848 df-tru 1540 df-ex 1777 df-sb 2063 df-clab 2713 df-cleq 2727 df-clel 2814 df-v 3480 df-un 3968 df-sn 4632 df-suc 6392 |
This theorem is referenced by: suctr 6472 trsucss 6474 ordnbtwn 6479 suc11 6493 tfrlem11 8427 omordi 8603 nnmordi 8668 pssnn 9207 phplem3OLD 9254 r1sdom 9812 cfsuc 10295 axdc3lem2 10489 axdc3lem4 10491 indpi 10945 constrmon 33749 bnj563 34736 bnj964 34936 ontgval 36414 onsucconni 36420 suctrALT 44824 suctrALT2VD 44834 suctrALT2 44835 suctrALTcf 44920 suctrALTcfVD 44921 suctrALT3 44922 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |