MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  elsuci Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem elsuci 6404
Description: Membership in a successor. This one-way implication does not require that either 𝐴 or 𝐵 be sets. Lemma 1.13 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-1994.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
elsuci (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 → (𝐴𝐵𝐴 = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem elsuci
StepHypRef Expression
1 df-suc 6341 . . . 4 suc 𝐵 = (𝐵 ∪ {𝐵})
21eleq2i 2821 . . 3 (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ {𝐵}))
3 elun 4119 . . 3 (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ {𝐵}) ↔ (𝐴𝐵𝐴 ∈ {𝐵}))
42, 3bitri 275 . 2 (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴𝐵𝐴 ∈ {𝐵}))
5 elsni 4609 . . 3 (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵} → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
65orim2i 910 . 2 ((𝐴𝐵𝐴 ∈ {𝐵}) → (𝐴𝐵𝐴 = 𝐵))
74, 6sylbi 217 1 (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 → (𝐴𝐵𝐴 = 𝐵))
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wo 847   = wceq 1540  wcel 2109  cun 3915  {csn 4592  suc csuc 6337
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-ext 2702
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-tru 1543  df-ex 1780  df-sb 2066  df-clab 2709  df-cleq 2722  df-clel 2804  df-v 3452  df-un 3922  df-sn 4593  df-suc 6341
This theorem is referenced by:  suctr  6423  trsucss  6425  ordnbtwn  6430  suc11  6444  tfrlem11  8359  omordi  8533  nnmordi  8598  pssnn  9138  r1sdom  9734  cfsuc  10217  axdc3lem2  10411  axdc3lem4  10413  indpi  10867  constrmon  33741  bnj563  34740  bnj964  34940  ontgval  36426  onsucconni  36432  suctrALT  44822  suctrALT2VD  44832  suctrALT2  44833  suctrALTcf  44918  suctrALTcfVD  44919  suctrALT3  44920
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator