![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > elsuci | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Membership in a successor. This one-way implication does not require that either 𝐴 or 𝐵 be sets. Lemma 1.13 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-1994.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
elsuci | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | df-suc 6401 | . . . 4 ⊢ suc 𝐵 = (𝐵 ∪ {𝐵}) | |
2 | 1 | eleq2i 2836 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ {𝐵})) |
3 | elun 4176 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ {𝐵}) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵})) | |
4 | 2, 3 | bitri 275 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵})) |
5 | elsni 4665 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵} → 𝐴 = 𝐵) | |
6 | 5 | orim2i 909 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵}) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) |
7 | 4, 6 | sylbi 217 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∨ wo 846 = wceq 1537 ∈ wcel 2108 ∪ cun 3974 {csn 4648 suc csuc 6397 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1793 ax-4 1807 ax-5 1909 ax-6 1967 ax-7 2007 ax-8 2110 ax-9 2118 ax-ext 2711 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 847 df-tru 1540 df-ex 1778 df-sb 2065 df-clab 2718 df-cleq 2732 df-clel 2819 df-v 3490 df-un 3981 df-sn 4649 df-suc 6401 |
This theorem is referenced by: suctr 6481 trsucss 6483 ordnbtwn 6488 suc11 6502 tfrlem11 8444 omordi 8622 nnmordi 8687 pssnn 9234 phplem3OLD 9282 r1sdom 9843 cfsuc 10326 axdc3lem2 10520 axdc3lem4 10522 indpi 10976 constrmon 33734 bnj563 34719 bnj964 34919 ontgval 36397 onsucconni 36403 suctrALT 44797 suctrALT2VD 44807 suctrALT2 44808 suctrALTcf 44893 suctrALTcfVD 44894 suctrALT3 44895 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |