Theorem elsuci 6388

Description: Membership in a successor. This one-way implication does not require that either 𝐴 or 𝐵 be sets. Lemma 1.13 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-1994.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
elsuci	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem elsuci

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-suc 6325	. . . 4 ⊢ suc 𝐵 = (𝐵 ∪ {𝐵})
2	1	eleq2i 2829	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ {𝐵}))
3		elun 4094	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ {𝐵}) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵}))
4	2, 3	bitri 275	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵}))
5		elsni 4585	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵} → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
6	5	orim2i 911	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵}) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
7	4, 6	sylbi 217	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∨ wo 848   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2114   ∪ cun 3888  {csn 4568  suc csuc 6321

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-ext 2709

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-tru 1545  df-ex 1782  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2812  df-v 3432  df-un 3895  df-sn 4569  df-suc 6325

This theorem is referenced by:  suctr  6407  trsucss  6409  ordnbtwn  6414  suc11  6428  tfrlem11  8322  omordi  8496  nnmordi  8562  pssnn  9098  r1sdom  9693  cfsuc  10174  axdc3lem2  10368  axdc3lem4  10370  indpi  10825  constrmon  33908  bnj563  34906  bnj964  35105  ontgval  36633  onsucconni  36639  suctrALT  45276  suctrALT2VD  45286  suctrALT2  45287  suctrALTcf  45372  suctrALTcfVD  45373  suctrALT3  45374