Theorem elsuci 6383

Description: Membership in a successor. This one-way implication does not require that either 𝐴 or 𝐵 be sets. Lemma 1.13 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-1994.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
elsuci	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem elsuci

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-suc 6320	. . . 4 ⊢ suc 𝐵 = (𝐵 ∪ {𝐵})
2	1	eleq2i 2833	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ {𝐵}))
3		elun 4086	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ {𝐵}) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵}))
4	2, 3	bitri 277	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵}))
5		elsni 4575	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵} → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
6	5	orim2i 917	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵}) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
7	4, 6	sylbi 219	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∨ wo 854   = wceq 1548   ∈ wcel 2121   ∪ cun 3883  {csn 4558  suc csuc 6316

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1803  ax-4 1817  ax-5 1918  ax-6 1975  ax-7 2016  ax-8 2123  ax-9 2131  ax-ext 2713

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 398  df-or 855  df-tru 1551  df-ex 1788  df-sb 2075  df-clab 2720  df-cleq 2733  df-clel 2816  df-v 3435  df-un 3890  df-sn 4559  df-suc 6320

This theorem is referenced by:  suctr  6402  trsucss  6404  ordnbtwn  6409  suc11  6423  tfrlem11  8321  omordi  8495  nnmordi  8561  pssnn  9097  r1sdom  9693  cfsuc  10174  axdc3lem2  10368  axdc3lem4  10370  indpi  10825  constrmon  33940  bnj563  34941  bnj964  35140  ontgval  36674  onsucconni  36680  suctrALT  45284  suctrALT2VD  45294  suctrALT2  45295  suctrALTcf  45380  suctrALTcfVD  45381  suctrALT3  45382