![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > elsuci | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Membership in a successor. This one-way implication does not require that either 𝐴 or 𝐵 be sets. Lemma 1.13 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-1994.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
elsuci | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | df-suc 6371 | . . . 4 ⊢ suc 𝐵 = (𝐵 ∪ {𝐵}) | |
2 | 1 | eleq2i 2826 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ {𝐵})) |
3 | elun 4149 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ {𝐵}) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵})) | |
4 | 2, 3 | bitri 275 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵})) |
5 | elsni 4646 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵} → 𝐴 = 𝐵) | |
6 | 5 | orim2i 910 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵}) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) |
7 | 4, 6 | sylbi 216 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∨ wo 846 = wceq 1542 ∈ wcel 2107 ∪ cun 3947 {csn 4629 suc csuc 6367 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1798 ax-4 1812 ax-5 1914 ax-6 1972 ax-7 2012 ax-8 2109 ax-9 2117 ax-ext 2704 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 398 df-or 847 df-tru 1545 df-ex 1783 df-sb 2069 df-clab 2711 df-cleq 2725 df-clel 2811 df-v 3477 df-un 3954 df-sn 4630 df-suc 6371 |
This theorem is referenced by: suctr 6451 trsucss 6453 ordnbtwn 6458 suc11 6472 tfrlem11 8388 omordi 8566 nnmordi 8631 pssnn 9168 phplem3OLD 9219 pssnnOLD 9265 r1sdom 9769 cfsuc 10252 axdc3lem2 10446 axdc3lem4 10448 indpi 10902 bnj563 33785 bnj964 33985 ontgval 35364 onsucconni 35370 suctrALT 43635 suctrALT2VD 43645 suctrALT2 43646 suctrALTcf 43731 suctrALTcfVD 43732 suctrALT3 43733 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |