Theorem elsuci 6426

Description: Membership in a successor. This one-way implication does not require that either 𝐴 or 𝐵 be sets. Lemma 1.13 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-1994.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
elsuci	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem elsuci

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-suc 6363	. . . 4 ⊢ suc 𝐵 = (𝐵 ∪ {𝐵})
2	1	eleq2i 2827	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ {𝐵}))
3		elun 4133	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ {𝐵}) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵}))
4	2, 3	bitri 275	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵}))
5		elsni 4623	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵} → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
6	5	orim2i 910	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐵}) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
7	4, 6	sylbi 217	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∨ wo 847   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109   ∪ cun 3929  {csn 4606  suc csuc 6359

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-ext 2708

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-tru 1543  df-ex 1780  df-sb 2066  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2810  df-v 3466  df-un 3936  df-sn 4607  df-suc 6363

This theorem is referenced by:  suctr  6445  trsucss  6447  ordnbtwn  6452  suc11  6466  tfrlem11  8407  omordi  8583  nnmordi  8648  pssnn  9187  phplem3OLD  9235  r1sdom  9793  cfsuc  10276  axdc3lem2  10470  axdc3lem4  10472  indpi  10926  constrmon  33783  bnj563  34779  bnj964  34979  ontgval  36454  onsucconni  36460  suctrALT  44817  suctrALT2VD  44827  suctrALT2  44828  suctrALTcf  44913  suctrALTcfVD  44914  suctrALT3  44915