MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  elsuci Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem elsuci 6371
Description: Membership in a successor. This one-way implication does not require that either 𝐴 or 𝐵 be sets. Lemma 1.13 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-1994.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
elsuci (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 → (𝐴𝐵𝐴 = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem elsuci
StepHypRef Expression
1 df-suc 6308 . . . 4 suc 𝐵 = (𝐵 ∪ {𝐵})
21eleq2i 2821 . . 3 (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ {𝐵}))
3 elun 4101 . . 3 (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ {𝐵}) ↔ (𝐴𝐵𝐴 ∈ {𝐵}))
42, 3bitri 275 . 2 (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴𝐵𝐴 ∈ {𝐵}))
5 elsni 4591 . . 3 (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵} → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
65orim2i 910 . 2 ((𝐴𝐵𝐴 ∈ {𝐵}) → (𝐴𝐵𝐴 = 𝐵))
74, 6sylbi 217 1 (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 → (𝐴𝐵𝐴 = 𝐵))
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wo 847   = wceq 1541  wcel 2110  cun 3898  {csn 4574  suc csuc 6304
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2112  ax-9 2120  ax-ext 2702
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-tru 1544  df-ex 1781  df-sb 2067  df-clab 2709  df-cleq 2722  df-clel 2804  df-v 3436  df-un 3905  df-sn 4575  df-suc 6308
This theorem is referenced by:  suctr  6390  trsucss  6392  ordnbtwn  6397  suc11  6411  tfrlem11  8302  omordi  8476  nnmordi  8541  pssnn  9073  r1sdom  9659  cfsuc  10140  axdc3lem2  10334  axdc3lem4  10336  indpi  10790  constrmon  33747  bnj563  34745  bnj964  34945  ontgval  36444  onsucconni  36450  suctrALT  44837  suctrALT2VD  44847  suctrALT2  44848  suctrALTcf  44933  suctrALTcfVD  44934  suctrALT3  44935
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator