MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  elsuci Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem elsuci 6387
Description: Membership in a successor. This one-way implication does not require that either 𝐴 or 𝐵 be sets. Lemma 1.13 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-1994.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
elsuci (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 → (𝐴𝐵𝐴 = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem elsuci
StepHypRef Expression
1 df-suc 6324 . . . 4 suc 𝐵 = (𝐵 ∪ {𝐵})
21eleq2i 2829 . . 3 (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ {𝐵}))
3 elun 4106 . . 3 (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ {𝐵}) ↔ (𝐴𝐵𝐴 ∈ {𝐵}))
42, 3bitri 275 . 2 (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴𝐵𝐴 ∈ {𝐵}))
5 elsni 4598 . . 3 (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵} → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
65orim2i 911 . 2 ((𝐴𝐵𝐴 ∈ {𝐵}) → (𝐴𝐵𝐴 = 𝐵))
74, 6sylbi 217 1 (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 → (𝐴𝐵𝐴 = 𝐵))
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wo 848   = wceq 1542  wcel 2114  cun 3900  {csn 4581  suc csuc 6320
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-ext 2709
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-tru 1545  df-ex 1782  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2812  df-v 3443  df-un 3907  df-sn 4582  df-suc 6324
This theorem is referenced by:  suctr  6406  trsucss  6408  ordnbtwn  6413  suc11  6427  tfrlem11  8321  omordi  8495  nnmordi  8561  pssnn  9097  r1sdom  9690  cfsuc  10171  axdc3lem2  10365  axdc3lem4  10367  indpi  10822  constrmon  33903  bnj563  34901  bnj964  35101  ontgval  36627  onsucconni  36633  suctrALT  45133  suctrALT2VD  45143  suctrALT2  45144  suctrALTcf  45229  suctrALTcfVD  45230  suctrALT3  45231
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator