Theorem bnj95 34495

Description: Technical lemma for bnj124 34502. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
bnj95.1	⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨∅, pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj95	⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V

Proof of Theorem bnj95

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj95.1	. 2 ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨∅, pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}
2		snex 5433	. 2 ⊢ {⟨∅, pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩} ∈ V
3	1, 2	eqeltri 2825	1 ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V

Syntax hints:   = wceq 1534   ∈ wcel 2099  Vcvv 3471  ∅c0 4323  {csn 4629  ⟨cop 4635   predc-bnj14 34319

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1790  ax-4 1804  ax-5 1906  ax-6 1964  ax-7 2004  ax-8 2101  ax-9 2109  ax-ext 2699  ax-sep 5299  ax-nul 5306  ax-pr 5429

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-tru 1537  df-fal 1547  df-ex 1775  df-sb 2061  df-clab 2706  df-cleq 2720  df-clel 2806  df-v 3473  df-dif 3950  df-un 3952  df-nul 4324  df-sn 4630  df-pr 4632

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj124  34502  bnj125  34503  bnj126  34504  bnj150  34507