Theorem bnj95 34857

Description: Technical lemma for bnj124 34864. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
bnj95.1	⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨∅, pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj95	⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V

Proof of Theorem bnj95

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj95.1	. 2 ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨∅, pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}
2		snex 5442	. 2 ⊢ {⟨∅, pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩} ∈ V
3	1, 2	eqeltri 2835	1 ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V

Syntax hints:   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2106  Vcvv 3478  ∅c0 4339  {csn 4631  ⟨cop 4637   predc-bnj14 34681

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1792  ax-4 1806  ax-5 1908  ax-6 1965  ax-7 2005  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-ext 2706  ax-sep 5302  ax-nul 5312  ax-pr 5438

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1777  df-sb 2063  df-clab 2713  df-cleq 2727  df-clel 2814  df-v 3480  df-dif 3966  df-un 3968  df-nul 4340  df-sn 4632  df-pr 4634

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj124  34864  bnj125  34865  bnj126  34866  bnj150  34869