Theorem bnj95 34895

Description: Technical lemma for bnj124 34902. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
bnj95.1	⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨∅, pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj95	⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V

Proof of Theorem bnj95

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj95.1	. 2 ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨∅, pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}
2		snex 5406	. 2 ⊢ {⟨∅, pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩} ∈ V
3	1, 2	eqeltri 2830	1 ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V

Syntax hints:   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2108  Vcvv 3459  ∅c0 4308  {csn 4601  ⟨cop 4607   predc-bnj14 34719

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-ext 2707  ax-sep 5266  ax-nul 5276  ax-pr 5402

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-sb 2065  df-clab 2714  df-cleq 2727  df-clel 2809  df-v 3461  df-dif 3929  df-un 3931  df-nul 4309  df-sn 4602  df-pr 4604

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj124  34902  bnj125  34903  bnj126  34904  bnj150  34907