Theorem bnj95 34876

Description: Technical lemma for bnj124 34883. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
bnj95.1	⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨∅, pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj95	⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V

Proof of Theorem bnj95

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj95.1	. 2 ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨∅, pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}
2		snex 5372	. 2 ⊢ {⟨∅, pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩} ∈ V
3	1, 2	eqeltri 2827	1 ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V

Syntax hints:   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2111  Vcvv 3436  ∅c0 4280  {csn 4573  ⟨cop 4579   predc-bnj14 34700

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-ext 2703  ax-sep 5232  ax-nul 5242  ax-pr 5368

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1781  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2710  df-cleq 2723  df-clel 2806  df-v 3438  df-dif 3900  df-un 3902  df-nul 4281  df-sn 4574  df-pr 4576

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj124  34883  bnj125  34884  bnj126  34885  bnj150  34888