Theorem bnj95 32840

Description: Technical lemma for bnj124 32847. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
bnj95.1	⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨∅, pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj95	⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V

Proof of Theorem bnj95

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj95.1	. 2 ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨∅, pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}
2		snex 5358	. 2 ⊢ {⟨∅, pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩} ∈ V
3	1, 2	eqeltri 2837	1 ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V

Syntax hints:   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2110  Vcvv 3431  ∅c0 4262  {csn 4567  ⟨cop 4573   predc-bnj14 32663

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1802  ax-4 1816  ax-5 1917  ax-6 1975  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2112  ax-9 2120  ax-ext 2711  ax-sep 5227  ax-nul 5234  ax-pr 5356

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1787  df-sb 2072  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2818  df-v 3433  df-dif 3895  df-un 3897  df-nul 4263  df-sn 4568  df-pr 4570

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj124  32847  bnj125  32848  bnj126  32849  bnj150  32852