Theorem bnj96 34841

Description: Technical lemma for bnj150 34852. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-May-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
bnj96.1	⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨∅, pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj96	⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → dom 𝐹 = 1o)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝑅

Allowed substitution hint:   𝐹(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem bnj96

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj93 34839	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ V)
2		dmsnopg 6244	. . 3 ⊢ ( pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ V → dom {⟨∅, pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩} = {∅})
3	1, 2	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → dom {⟨∅, pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩} = {∅})
4		bnj96.1	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨∅, pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}
5	4	dmeqi 5929	. 2 ⊢ dom 𝐹 = dom {⟨∅, pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}
6		df1o2 8529	. 2 ⊢ 1o = {∅}
7	3, 5, 6	3eqtr4g 2805	1 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → dom 𝐹 = 1o)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2108  Vcvv 3488  ∅c0 4352  {csn 4648  ⟨cop 4654  dom cdm 5700  1_oc1o 8515   predc-bnj14 34664   FrSe w-bnj15 34668

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2711  ax-sep 5317  ax-nul 5324  ax-pr 5447

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1778  df-sb 2065  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2819  df-ral 3068  df-rab 3444  df-v 3490  df-dif 3979  df-un 3981  df-ss 3993  df-nul 4353  df-if 4549  df-sn 4649  df-pr 4651  df-op 4655  df-br 5167  df-dm 5710  df-suc 6401  df-1o 8522  df-bnj13 34667  df-bnj15 34669

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj150  34852