Theorem bnj124 31458

Description: Technical lemma for bnj150 31463. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 22-Dec-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj124.1	⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨∅, pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}
bnj124.2	⊢ (𝜑″ ↔ [𝐹 / 𝑓]𝜑′)
bnj124.3	⊢ (𝜓″ ↔ [𝐹 / 𝑓]𝜓′)
bnj124.4	⊢ (𝜁″ ↔ [𝐹 / 𝑓]𝜁′)
bnj124.5	⊢ (𝜁′ ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑓 Fn 1𝑜 ∧ 𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj124	⊢ (𝜁″ ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹 Fn 1𝑜 ∧ 𝜑″ ∧ 𝜓″)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑓   𝑅,𝑓   𝑥,𝑓

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑥)   𝑅(𝑥)   𝐹(𝑥,𝑓)   𝜑′(𝑥,𝑓)   𝜓′(𝑥,𝑓)   𝜁′(𝑥,𝑓)   𝜑″(𝑥,𝑓)   𝜓″(𝑥,𝑓)   𝜁″(𝑥,𝑓)

Proof of Theorem bnj124

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj124.4	. 2 ⊢ (𝜁″ ↔ [𝐹 / 𝑓]𝜁′)
2		bnj124.5	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜁′ ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑓 Fn 1𝑜 ∧ 𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′)))
3	2	sbcbii 3689	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝐹 / 𝑓]𝜁′ ↔ [𝐹 / 𝑓]((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑓 Fn 1𝑜 ∧ 𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′)))
4		bnj124.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨∅, pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}
5	4	bnj95 31451	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V
6		nfv 2010	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑓(𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
7	6	sbc19.21g 3698	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ V → ([𝐹 / 𝑓]((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑓 Fn 1𝑜 ∧ 𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′)) ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → [𝐹 / 𝑓](𝑓 Fn 1𝑜 ∧ 𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′))))
8	5, 7	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝐹 / 𝑓]((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑓 Fn 1𝑜 ∧ 𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′)) ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → [𝐹 / 𝑓](𝑓 Fn 1𝑜 ∧ 𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′)))
9		fneq1 6190	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑧 → (𝑓 Fn 1𝑜 ↔ 𝑧 Fn 1𝑜))
10		fneq1 6190	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐹 → (𝑧 Fn 1𝑜 ↔ 𝐹 Fn 1𝑜))
11	9, 10	sbcie2g 3667	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ V → ([𝐹 / 𝑓]𝑓 Fn 1𝑜 ↔ 𝐹 Fn 1𝑜))
12	5, 11	ax-mp 5	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ([𝐹 / 𝑓]𝑓 Fn 1𝑜 ↔ 𝐹 Fn 1𝑜)
13	12	bicomi 216	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 1𝑜 ↔ [𝐹 / 𝑓]𝑓 Fn 1𝑜)
14		bnj124.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑″ ↔ [𝐹 / 𝑓]𝜑′)
15		bnj124.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜓″ ↔ [𝐹 / 𝑓]𝜓′)
16	13, 14, 15, 5	bnj206 31317	. . . 4 ⊢ ([𝐹 / 𝑓](𝑓 Fn 1𝑜 ∧ 𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′) ↔ (𝐹 Fn 1𝑜 ∧ 𝜑″ ∧ 𝜓″))
17	16	imbi2i 328	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → [𝐹 / 𝑓](𝑓 Fn 1𝑜 ∧ 𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′)) ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹 Fn 1𝑜 ∧ 𝜑″ ∧ 𝜓″)))
18	3, 8, 17	3bitri 289	. 2 ⊢ ([𝐹 / 𝑓]𝜁′ ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹 Fn 1𝑜 ∧ 𝜑″ ∧ 𝜓″)))
19	1, 18	bitri 267	1 ⊢ (𝜁″ ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹 Fn 1𝑜 ∧ 𝜑″ ∧ 𝜓″)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 198   ∧ wa 385   ∧ w3a 1108   = wceq 1653   ∈ wcel 2157  Vcvv 3385  [wsbc 3633  ∅c0 4115  {csn 4368  ⟨cop 4374   Fn wfn 6096  1_𝑜c1o 7792   predc-bnj14 31274   FrSe w-bnj15 31278

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1891  ax-4 1905  ax-5 2006  ax-6 2072  ax-7 2107  ax-9 2166  ax-10 2185  ax-11 2200  ax-12 2213  ax-13 2377  ax-ext 2777  ax-sep 4975  ax-nul 4983  ax-pr 5097

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 199  df-an 386  df-or 875  df-3an 1110  df-tru 1657  df-ex 1876  df-nf 1880  df-sb 2065  df-clab 2786  df-cleq 2792  df-clel 2795  df-nfc 2930  df-rab 3098  df-v 3387  df-sbc 3634  df-dif 3772  df-un 3774  df-in 3776  df-ss 3783  df-nul 4116  df-if 4278  df-sn 4369  df-pr 4371  df-op 4375  df-br 4844  df-opab 4906  df-rel 5319  df-cnv 5320  df-co 5321  df-dm 5322  df-fun 6103  df-fn 6104

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj150  31463  bnj153  31467