| Mathbox for Jonathan Ben-Naim |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > Mathboxes > bnj124 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Technical lemma for bnj150 35058. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 22-Dec-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| bnj124.1 | ⊢ 𝐹 = {〈∅, pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)〉} |
| bnj124.2 | ⊢ (𝜑″ ↔ [𝐹 / 𝑓]𝜑′) |
| bnj124.3 | ⊢ (𝜓″ ↔ [𝐹 / 𝑓]𝜓′) |
| bnj124.4 | ⊢ (𝜁″ ↔ [𝐹 / 𝑓]𝜁′) |
| bnj124.5 | ⊢ (𝜁′ ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑓 Fn 1o ∧ 𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′))) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| bnj124 | ⊢ (𝜁″ ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹 Fn 1o ∧ 𝜑″ ∧ 𝜓″))) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | bnj124.4 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜁″ ↔ [𝐹 / 𝑓]𝜁′) | |
| 2 | bnj124.5 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜁′ ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑓 Fn 1o ∧ 𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′))) | |
| 3 | 2 | sbcbii 3779 | . . 3 ⊢ ([𝐹 / 𝑓]𝜁′ ↔ [𝐹 / 𝑓]((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑓 Fn 1o ∧ 𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′))) |
| 4 | bnj124.1 | . . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐹 = {〈∅, pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)〉} | |
| 5 | 4 | bnj95 35046 | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V |
| 6 | nfv 1921 | . . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑓(𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) | |
| 7 | 6 | sbc19.21g 3794 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ V → ([𝐹 / 𝑓]((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑓 Fn 1o ∧ 𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′)) ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → [𝐹 / 𝑓](𝑓 Fn 1o ∧ 𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′)))) |
| 8 | 5, 7 | ax-mp 5 | . . 3 ⊢ ([𝐹 / 𝑓]((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑓 Fn 1o ∧ 𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′)) ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → [𝐹 / 𝑓](𝑓 Fn 1o ∧ 𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′))) |
| 9 | fneq1 6576 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑧 → (𝑓 Fn 1o ↔ 𝑧 Fn 1o)) | |
| 10 | fneq1 6576 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐹 → (𝑧 Fn 1o ↔ 𝐹 Fn 1o)) | |
| 11 | 9, 10 | sbcie2g 3763 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ V → ([𝐹 / 𝑓]𝑓 Fn 1o ↔ 𝐹 Fn 1o)) |
| 12 | 5, 11 | ax-mp 5 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ([𝐹 / 𝑓]𝑓 Fn 1o ↔ 𝐹 Fn 1o) |
| 13 | 12 | bicomi 225 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 1o ↔ [𝐹 / 𝑓]𝑓 Fn 1o) |
| 14 | bnj124.2 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑″ ↔ [𝐹 / 𝑓]𝜑′) | |
| 15 | bnj124.3 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜓″ ↔ [𝐹 / 𝑓]𝜓′) | |
| 16 | 13, 14, 15, 5 | bnj206 34914 | . . . 4 ⊢ ([𝐹 / 𝑓](𝑓 Fn 1o ∧ 𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′) ↔ (𝐹 Fn 1o ∧ 𝜑″ ∧ 𝜓″)) |
| 17 | 16 | imbi2i 337 | . . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → [𝐹 / 𝑓](𝑓 Fn 1o ∧ 𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′)) ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹 Fn 1o ∧ 𝜑″ ∧ 𝜓″))) |
| 18 | 3, 8, 17 | 3bitri 298 | . 2 ⊢ ([𝐹 / 𝑓]𝜁′ ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹 Fn 1o ∧ 𝜑″ ∧ 𝜓″))) |
| 19 | 1, 18 | bitri 276 | 1 ⊢ (𝜁″ ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹 Fn 1o ∧ 𝜑″ ∧ 𝜓″))) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 207 ∧ wa 396 ∧ w3a 1092 = wceq 1547 ∈ wcel 2119 Vcvv 3431 [wsbc 3723 ∅c0 4261 {csn 4555 〈cop 4561 Fn wfn 6480 1oc1o 8388 predc-bnj14 34871 FrSe w-bnj15 34875 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1802 ax-4 1816 ax-5 1917 ax-6 1974 ax-7 2015 ax-8 2121 ax-9 2129 ax-10 2152 ax-12 2189 ax-ext 2711 ax-sep 5218 ax-pr 5362 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 208 df-an 397 df-or 854 df-3an 1094 df-tru 1550 df-fal 1560 df-ex 1787 df-nf 1791 df-sb 2074 df-clab 2718 df-cleq 2731 df-clel 2814 df-rab 3392 df-v 3433 df-sbc 3724 df-dif 3886 df-un 3888 df-ss 3900 df-nul 4262 df-if 4455 df-sn 4556 df-pr 4558 df-op 4562 df-br 5073 df-opab 5135 df-rel 5625 df-cnv 5626 df-co 5627 df-dm 5628 df-fun 6487 df-fn 6488 |
| This theorem is referenced by: bnj150 35058 bnj153 35062 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |