P. 345 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 34401-34500   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	iprodgam 34401*	An infinite product version of Euler's gamma function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Feb-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ (ℤ ∖ ℕ)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Γ‘𝐴) = (∏𝑘 ∈ ℕ (((1 + (1 / 𝑘))↑𝑐𝐴) / (1 + (𝐴 / 𝑘))) / 𝐴))
21.9.7  Factorial limits
Theorem	faclimlem1 34402*	Lemma for faclim 34405. Closed form for a particular sequence. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 → seq1( · , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (((1 + (𝑀 / 𝑛)) · (1 + (1 / 𝑛))) / (1 + ((𝑀 + 1) / 𝑛))))) = (𝑥 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((𝑀 + 1) · ((𝑥 + 1) / (𝑥 + (𝑀 + 1))))))
Theorem	faclimlem2 34403*	Lemma for faclim 34405. Show a limit for the inductive step. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 → seq1( · , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (((1 + (𝑀 / 𝑛)) · (1 + (1 / 𝑛))) / (1 + ((𝑀 + 1) / 𝑛))))) ⇝ (𝑀 + 1))
Theorem	faclimlem3 34404	Lemma for faclim 34405. Algebraic manipulation for the final induction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Dec-2017.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → (((1 + (1 / 𝐵))↑(𝑀 + 1)) / (1 + ((𝑀 + 1) / 𝐵))) = ((((1 + (1 / 𝐵))↑𝑀) / (1 + (𝑀 / 𝐵))) · (((1 + (𝑀 / 𝐵)) · (1 + (1 / 𝐵))) / (1 + ((𝑀 + 1) / 𝐵)))))
Theorem	faclim 34405*	An infinite product expression relating to factorials. Originally due to Euler. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Nov-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (((1 + (1 / 𝑛))↑𝐴) / (1 + (𝐴 / 𝑛))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 → seq1( · , 𝐹) ⇝ (!‘𝐴))
Theorem	iprodfac 34406*	An infinite product expression for factorial. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 → (!‘𝐴) = ∏𝑘 ∈ ℕ (((1 + (1 / 𝑘))↑𝐴) / (1 + (𝐴 / 𝑘))))
Theorem	faclim2 34407*	Another factorial limit due to Euler. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Dec-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ (((!‘𝑛) · ((𝑛 + 1)↑𝑀)) / (!‘(𝑛 + 𝑀))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℕ0 → 𝐹 ⇝ 1)
21.9.8  Greatest common divisor and divisibility
Theorem	gcd32 34408	Swap the second and third arguments of a gcd. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐴 gcd 𝐵) gcd 𝐶) = ((𝐴 gcd 𝐶) gcd 𝐵))
Theorem	gcdabsorb 34409	Absorption law for gcd. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐴 gcd 𝐵) gcd 𝐵) = (𝐴 gcd 𝐵))
21.9.9  Properties of relationships
Theorem	dftr6 34410	A potential definition of transitivity for sets. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Mar-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ (V ∖ ran (( E ∘ E ) ∖ E )))
Theorem	coep 34411*	Composition with the membership relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Feb-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴( E ∘ 𝑅)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐴𝑅𝑥)
Theorem	coepr 34412*	Composition with the converse membership relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Feb-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴(𝑅 ∘ ◡ E )𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥𝑅𝐵)
Theorem	dffr5 34413	A quantifier-free definition of a well-founded relationship. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Apr-2011.)
⊢ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ (𝒫 𝐴 ∖ {∅}) ⊆ ran ( E ∖ ( E ∘ ◡𝑅)))
Theorem	dfso2 34414	Quantifier-free definition of a strict order. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Feb-2013.)
⊢ (𝑅 Or 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ (𝐴 × 𝐴) ⊆ (𝑅 ∪ ( I ∪ ◡𝑅))))
Theorem	br8 34415*	Substitution for an eight-place predicate. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Sep-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝐶 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑑 = 𝐷 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑒 = 𝐸 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜁))    &   ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → (𝜁 ↔ 𝜎))    &   ⊢ (ℎ = 𝐻 → (𝜎 ↔ 𝜌))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → 𝑃 = 𝑄)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑝, 𝑞⟩ ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝑃 ∃ℎ ∈ 𝑃 (𝑝 = ⟨⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩, ⟨𝑐, 𝑑⟩⟩ ∧ 𝑞 = ⟨⟨𝑒, 𝑓⟩, ⟨𝑔, ℎ⟩⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑄 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑄 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑄 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑄 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑄 ∧ 𝐻 ∈ 𝑄)) → (⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩⟩𝑅⟨⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩, ⟨𝐺, 𝐻⟩⟩ ↔ 𝜌))
Theorem	br6 34416*	Substitution for a six-place predicate. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝐶 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑑 = 𝐷 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑒 = 𝐸 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝜂 ↔ 𝜁))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → 𝑃 = 𝑄)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑝, 𝑞⟩ ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑓 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑝 = ⟨𝑎, ⟨𝑏, 𝑐⟩⟩ ∧ 𝑞 = ⟨𝑑, ⟨𝑒, 𝑓⟩⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑄 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑄 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ 𝑄 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑄 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑄)) → (⟨𝐴, ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩⟩𝑅⟨𝐷, ⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩⟩ ↔ 𝜁))
Theorem	br4 34417*	Substitution for a four-place predicate. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2013.)
⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝐶 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑑 = 𝐷 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → 𝑃 = 𝑄)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑝, 𝑞⟩ ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑃 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝑃 (𝑝 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∧ 𝑞 = ⟨𝑐, 𝑑⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑄 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑄) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑄 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑄)) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩𝑅⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ↔ 𝜏))
Theorem	cnvco1 34418	Another distributive law of converse over class composition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-May-2014.)
⊢ ◡(◡𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = (◡𝐵 ∘ 𝐴)
Theorem	cnvco2 34419	Another distributive law of converse over class composition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-May-2014.)
⊢ ◡(𝐴 ∘ ◡𝐵) = (𝐵 ∘ ◡𝐴)
Theorem	eldm3 34420	Quantifier-free definition of membership in a domain. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐵 ↔ (𝐵 ↾ {𝐴}) ≠ ∅)
Theorem	elrn3 34421	Quantifier-free definition of membership in a range. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ran 𝐵 ↔ (𝐵 ∩ (V × {𝐴})) ≠ ∅)
Theorem	pocnv 34422	The converse of a partial ordering is still a partial ordering. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2018.)
⊢ (𝑅 Po 𝐴 → ◡𝑅 Po 𝐴)
Theorem	socnv 34423	The converse of a strict ordering is still a strict ordering. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2018.)
⊢ (𝑅 Or 𝐴 → ◡𝑅 Or 𝐴)
Theorem	sotrd 34424	Transitivity law for strict orderings, deduction form. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Nov-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋𝑅𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌𝑅𝑍)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋𝑅𝑍)
Theorem	elintfv 34425*	Membership in an intersection of function values. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Dec-2021.)
⊢ 𝑋 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑋 ∈ ∩ (𝐹 “ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑋 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦)))
21.9.10  Properties of functions and mappings
Theorem	funpsstri 34426	A condition for subset trichotomy for functions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Apr-2011.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐻 ∧ (𝐹 ⊆ 𝐻 ∧ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝐻) ∧ (dom 𝐹 ⊆ dom 𝐺 ∨ dom 𝐺 ⊆ dom 𝐹)) → (𝐹 ⊊ 𝐺 ∨ 𝐹 = 𝐺 ∨ 𝐺 ⊊ 𝐹))
Theorem	fundmpss 34427	If a class 𝐹 is a proper subset of a function 𝐺, then dom 𝐹 ⊊ dom 𝐺. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Apr-2011.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐺 → (𝐹 ⊊ 𝐺 → dom 𝐹 ⊊ dom 𝐺))
Theorem	funsseq 34428	Given two functions with equal domains, equality only requires one direction of the subset relationship. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Apr-2012.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2015.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ Fun 𝐺 ∧ dom 𝐹 = dom 𝐺) → (𝐹 = 𝐺 ↔ 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐺))
Theorem	fununiq 34429	The uniqueness condition of functions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Feb-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵 ∧ 𝐴𝐹𝐶) → 𝐵 = 𝐶))
Theorem	funbreq 34430	An equality condition for functions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Feb-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴𝐹𝐵) → (𝐴𝐹𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶))
Theorem	br1steq 34431	Uniqueness condition for the binary relation 1st. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Apr-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩1st 𝐶 ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐴)
Theorem	br2ndeq 34432	Uniqueness condition for the binary relation 2nd. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Apr-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 3-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩2nd 𝐶 ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐵)
Theorem	dfdm5 34433	Definition of domain in terms of 1st and image. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.)
⊢ dom 𝐴 = ((1st ↾ (V × V)) “ 𝐴)
Theorem	dfrn5 34434	Definition of range in terms of 2nd and image. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.)
⊢ ran 𝐴 = ((2nd ↾ (V × V)) “ 𝐴)
Theorem	opelco3 34435	Alternate way of saying that an ordered pair is in a composition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-May-2018.)
⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ (𝐶 ∘ 𝐷) ↔ 𝐵 ∈ (𝐶 “ (𝐷 “ {𝐴})))
Theorem	elima4 34436	Quantifier-free expression saying that a class is a member of an image. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-May-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑅 “ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐵 × {𝐴})) ≠ ∅)
Theorem	fv1stcnv 34437	The value of the converse of 1st restricted to a singleton. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉) → (◡(1st ↾ (𝐴 × {𝑌}))‘𝑋) = ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩)
Theorem	fv2ndcnv 34438	The value of the converse of 2nd restricted to a singleton. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) → (◡(2nd ↾ ({𝑋} × 𝐴))‘𝑌) = ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩)
21.9.11  Set induction (or epsilon induction)
Theorem	setinds 34439*	Principle of set induction (or E-induction). If a property passes from all elements of 𝑥 to 𝑥 itself, then it holds for all 𝑥. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜑
Theorem	setinds2f 34440*	E induction schema, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜓 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜑
Theorem	setinds2 34441*	E induction schema, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜓 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜑
21.9.12  Ordinal numbers
Theorem	elpotr 34442*	A class of transitive sets is partially ordered by E. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Oct-2010.)
⊢ (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 Tr 𝑧 → E Po 𝐴)
Theorem	dford5reg 34443	Given ax-reg 9537, an ordinal is a transitive class totally ordered by the membership relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 28-Jan-2011.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 ↔ (Tr 𝐴 ∧ E Or 𝐴))
Theorem	dfon2lem1 34444	Lemma for dfon2 34453. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 28-Feb-2011.)
⊢ Tr ∪ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ Tr 𝑥 ∧ 𝜓)}
Theorem	dfon2lem2 34445*	Lemma for dfon2 34453. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 28-Feb-2011.)
⊢ ∪ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)} ⊆ 𝐴
Theorem	dfon2lem3 34446*	Lemma for dfon2 34453. All sets satisfying the new definition are transitive and untangled. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Feb-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊊ 𝐴 ∧ Tr 𝑥) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (Tr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑧)))
Theorem	dfon2lem4 34447*	Lemma for dfon2 34453. If two sets satisfy the new definition, then one is a subset of the other. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Feb-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊊ 𝐴 ∧ Tr 𝑥) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ∀𝑦((𝑦 ⊊ 𝐵 ∧ Tr 𝑦) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴))
Theorem	dfon2lem5 34448*	Lemma for dfon2 34453. Two sets satisfying the new definition also satisfy trichotomy with respect to ∈. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Feb-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊊ 𝐴 ∧ Tr 𝑥) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ∀𝑦((𝑦 ⊊ 𝐵 ∧ Tr 𝑦) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	dfon2lem6 34449*	Lemma for dfon2 34453. A transitive class of sets satisfying the new definition satisfies the new definition. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Feb-2011.)
⊢ ((Tr 𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∀𝑧((𝑧 ⊊ 𝑥 ∧ Tr 𝑧) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥)) → ∀𝑦((𝑦 ⊊ 𝑆 ∧ Tr 𝑦) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆))
Theorem	dfon2lem7 34450*	Lemma for dfon2 34453. All elements of a new ordinal are new ordinals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Feb-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊊ 𝐴 ∧ Tr 𝑥) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦((𝑦 ⊊ 𝐵 ∧ Tr 𝑦) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)))
Theorem	dfon2lem8 34451*	Lemma for dfon2 34453. The intersection of a nonempty class 𝐴 of new ordinals is itself a new ordinal and is contained within 𝐴 (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Feb-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦((𝑦 ⊊ 𝑥 ∧ Tr 𝑦) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)) → (∀𝑧((𝑧 ⊊ ∩ 𝐴 ∧ Tr 𝑧) → 𝑧 ∈ ∩ 𝐴) ∧ ∩ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	dfon2lem9 34452*	Lemma for dfon2 34453. A class of new ordinals is well-founded by E. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Mar-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦((𝑦 ⊊ 𝑥 ∧ Tr 𝑦) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) → E Fr 𝐴)
Theorem	dfon2 34453*	On consists of all sets that contain all its transitive proper subsets. This definition comes from J. R. Isbell, "A Definition of Ordinal Numbers", American Mathematical Monthly, vol 67 (1960), pp. 51-52. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Feb-2011.)
⊢ On = {𝑥 ∣ ∀𝑦((𝑦 ⊊ 𝑥 ∧ Tr 𝑦) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)}
Theorem	rdgprc0 34454	The value of the recursive definition generator at ∅ when the base value is a proper class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐼 ∈ V → (rec(𝐹, 𝐼)‘∅) = ∅)
Theorem	rdgprc 34455	The value of the recursive definition generator when 𝐼 is a proper class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐼 ∈ V → rec(𝐹, 𝐼) = rec(𝐹, ∅))
Theorem	dfrdg2 34456*	Alternate definition of the recursive function generator when 𝐼 is a set. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ (𝐼 ∈ 𝑉 → rec(𝐹, 𝐼) = ∪ {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = if(𝑦 = ∅, 𝐼, if(Lim 𝑦, ∪ (𝑓 “ 𝑦), (𝐹‘(𝑓‘∪ 𝑦)))))})
Theorem	dfrdg3 34457*	Generalization of dfrdg2 34456 to remove sethood requirement. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ rec(𝐹, 𝐼) = ∪ {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = if(𝑦 = ∅, if(𝐼 ∈ V, 𝐼, ∅), if(Lim 𝑦, ∪ (𝑓 “ 𝑦), (𝐹‘(𝑓‘∪ 𝑦)))))}
21.9.13  Defined equality axioms
Theorem	axextdfeq 34458	A version of ax-ext 2702 for use with defined equality. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Dec-2010.)
⊢ ∃𝑧((𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦) → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑤 → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑤)))
Theorem	ax8dfeq 34459	A version of ax-8 2108 for use with defined equality. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Dec-2010.)
⊢ ∃𝑧((𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦) → (𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦))
Theorem	axextdist 34460	ax-ext 2702 with distinctors instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Dec-2010.)
⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦) → (∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))
Theorem	axextbdist 34461	axextb 2705 with distinctors instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Dec-2010.)
⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦) → (𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)))
Theorem	19.12b 34462*	Version of 19.12vv 2343 with not-free hypotheses, instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Dec-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ ∀𝑦∃𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	exnel 34463	There is always a set not in 𝑦. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Dec-2010.)
⊢ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
Theorem	distel 34464	Distinctors in terms of membership. (NOTE: this only works with relations where we can prove el 5399 and elirrv 9541.) (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Dec-2010.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑦 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦)
Theorem	axextndbi 34465	axextnd 10536 as a biconditional. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Dec-2010.)
⊢ ∃𝑧(𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦))
21.9.14  Hypothesis builders
Theorem	hbntg 34466	A more general form of hbnt 2290. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Dec-2010.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	hbimtg 34467	A more general and closed form of hbim 2295. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Dec-2010.)
⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜒) ∧ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜃)) → ((𝜒 → 𝜓) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜃)))
Theorem	hbaltg 34468	A more general and closed form of hbal 2167. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Dec-2010.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜓) → (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦∀𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	hbng 34469	A more general form of hbn 2291. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Dec-2010.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	hbimg 34470	A more general form of hbim 2295. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Dec-2010.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → ∀𝑥𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜓 → 𝜒) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜃))
21.9.15  Well-founded zero, successor, and limits
Syntax	cwsuc 34471	Declare the syntax for well-founded successor.
class wsuc(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋)
Syntax	cwlim 34472	Declare the syntax for well-founded limit class.
class WLim(𝑅, 𝐴)
Definition	df-wsuc 34473	Define the concept of a successor in a well-founded set. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 10-Oct-2021.)
⊢ wsuc(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) = inf(Pred(◡𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋), 𝐴, 𝑅)
Definition	df-wlim 34474*	Define the class of limit points of a well-founded set. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 10-Oct-2021.)
⊢ WLim(𝑅, 𝐴) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝑥 ≠ inf(𝐴, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ 𝑥 = sup(Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑥), 𝐴, 𝑅))}
Theorem	wsuceq123 34475	Equality theorem for well-founded successor. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2018.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Oct-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑅 = 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → wsuc(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) = wsuc(𝑆, 𝐵, 𝑌))
Theorem	wsuceq1 34476	Equality theorem for well-founded successor. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2018.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → wsuc(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) = wsuc(𝑆, 𝐴, 𝑋))
Theorem	wsuceq2 34477	Equality theorem for well-founded successor. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → wsuc(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) = wsuc(𝑅, 𝐵, 𝑋))
Theorem	wsuceq3 34478	Equality theorem for well-founded successor. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2018.)
⊢ (𝑋 = 𝑌 → wsuc(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) = wsuc(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑌))
Theorem	nfwsuc 34479	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for well-founded successor. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2018.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑋    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥wsuc(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋)
Theorem	wlimeq12 34480	Equality theorem for the limit class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Jun-2018.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Oct-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑅 = 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → WLim(𝑅, 𝐴) = WLim(𝑆, 𝐵))
Theorem	wlimeq1 34481	Equality theorem for the limit class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Jun-2018.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → WLim(𝑅, 𝐴) = WLim(𝑆, 𝐴))
Theorem	wlimeq2 34482	Equality theorem for the limit class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Jun-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → WLim(𝑅, 𝐴) = WLim(𝑅, 𝐵))
Theorem	nfwlim 34483	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the limit class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Jun-2018.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥WLim(𝑅, 𝐴)
Theorem	elwlim 34484	Membership in the limit class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 10-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ WLim(𝑅, 𝐴) ↔ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ inf(𝐴, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∧ 𝑋 = sup(Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋), 𝐴, 𝑅)))
Theorem	wzel 34485	The zero of a well-founded set is a member of that set. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 10-Oct-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → inf(𝐴, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	wsuclem 34486*	Lemma for the supremum properties of well-founded successor. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 10-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 We 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝑋𝑅𝑤)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (∀𝑦 ∈ Pred (◡𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) ¬ 𝑦𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → ∃𝑧 ∈ Pred (◡𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋)𝑧𝑅𝑦)))
Theorem	wsucex 34487	Existence theorem for well-founded successor. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2018.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Or 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → wsuc(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) ∈ V)
Theorem	wsuccl 34488*	If 𝑋 is a set with an 𝑅 successor in 𝐴, then its well-founded successor is a member of 𝐴. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Jun-2018.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 We 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑋𝑅𝑦)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → wsuc(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	wsuclb 34489	A well-founded successor is a lower bound on points after 𝑋. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2018.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 We 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋𝑅𝑌)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑌𝑅wsuc(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋))
Theorem	wlimss 34490	The class of limit points is a subclass of the base class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Jun-2018.)
⊢ WLim(𝑅, 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐴
21.9.16  Quantifier-free definitions
Syntax	ctxp 34491	Declare the syntax for tail Cartesian product.
class (𝐴 ⊗ 𝐵)
Syntax	cpprod 34492	Declare the syntax for the parallel product.
class pprod(𝑅, 𝑆)
Syntax	csset 34493	Declare the subset relationship class.
class SSet
Syntax	ctrans 34494	Declare the transitive set class.
class Trans
Syntax	cbigcup 34495	Declare the set union relationship.
class Bigcup
Syntax	cfix 34496	Declare the syntax for the fixpoints of a class.
class Fix 𝐴
Syntax	climits 34497	Declare the class of limit ordinals.
class Limits
Syntax	cfuns 34498	Declare the syntax for the class of all function.
class Funs
Syntax	csingle 34499	Declare the syntax for the singleton function.
class Singleton
Syntax	csingles 34500	Declare the syntax for the class of all singletons.
class Singletons