Theorem brrabga 39464

Description: The law of concretion for operation class abstraction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Oct-2022.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
brrabga.1	⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
brrabga.2	⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
brrabga	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩𝑅𝐶 ↔ 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝐶,𝑦,𝑧   𝜓,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧)   𝑅(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧)   𝑉(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧)   𝑊(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧)   𝑋(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧)

Proof of Theorem brrabga

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-br 5107	. . 3 ⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩𝑅𝐶 ↔ ⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝑅)
2		brrabga.2	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
3	2	eleq2i 2856	. . 3 ⊢ (⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝑅 ↔ ⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, 𝐶⟩ ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑})
4	1, 3	bitri 278	. 2 ⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩𝑅𝐶 ↔ ⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, 𝐶⟩ ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑})
5		brrabga.1	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
6	5	eloprabga 7549	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, 𝐶⟩ ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓))
7	4, 6	bitrid 286	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩𝑅𝐶 ↔ 𝜓))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147  ⟨cop 4838   class class class wbr 5106  {coprab 7441

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5252  ax-pr 5395

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2102  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-br 5107  df-oprab 7444

This theorem is used by:  brcnvrabga  39465