Theorem brrabga 39018

Description: The law of concretion for operation class abstraction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Oct-2022.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
brrabga.1	⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
brrabga.2	⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
brrabga	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩𝑅𝐶 ↔ 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝐶,𝑦,𝑧   𝜓,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧)   𝑅(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧)   𝑉(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧)   𝑊(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧)   𝑋(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧)

Proof of Theorem brrabga

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-br 5109	. . 3 ⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩𝑅𝐶 ↔ ⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝑅)
2		brrabga.2	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
3	2	eleq2i 2854	. . 3 ⊢ (⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝑅 ↔ ⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, 𝐶⟩ ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑})
4	1, 3	bitri 278	. 2 ⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩𝑅𝐶 ↔ ⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, 𝐶⟩ ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑})
5		brrabga.1	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
6	5	eloprabga 7521	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, 𝐶⟩ ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓))
7	4, 6	bitrid 286	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩𝑅𝐶 ↔ 𝜓))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ w3a 1102   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2142  ⟨cop 4594   class class class wbr 5108  {coprab 7413

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1824  ax-4 1838  ax-5 1939  ax-6 1996  ax-7 2037  ax-8 2144  ax-9 2152  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5256  ax-pr 5403

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1104  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1809  df-sb 2096  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-rab 3416  df-v 3456  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921  df-nul 4286  df-if 4487  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4595  df-br 5109  df-oprab 7416

This theorem is used by:  brcnvrabga  39019