| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 377 of 503) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-30989) |
(30990-32512) |
(32513-50280) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | bj-isvec 37601 | The predicate "is a vector space". (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 = (Scalar‘𝑉)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑉 ∈ LVec ↔ (𝑉 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐾 ∈ DivRing))) | ||
| Theorem | bj-fldssdrng 37602 | Fields are division rings. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ Field ⊆ DivRing | ||
| Theorem | bj-flddrng 37603 | Fields are division rings (elemental version). (Contributed by BJ, 9-Nov-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ Field → 𝐹 ∈ DivRing) | ||
| Theorem | bj-rrdrg 37604 | The field of real numbers is a division ring. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ ℝfld ∈ DivRing | ||
| Theorem | bj-isclm 37605 | The predicate "is a subcomplex module". (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑊 ∈ ℂMod ↔ (𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐹 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝐾) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (SubRing‘ℂfld)))) | ||
| Syntax | crrvec 37606 | Syntax for the class of real vector spaces. |
| class ℝ-Vec | ||
| Definition | df-bj-rvec 37607 | Definition of the class of real vector spaces. The previous definition, ⊢ ℝ-Vec = {𝑥 ∈ LMod ∣ (Scalar‘𝑥) = ℝfld}, can be recovered using bj-isrvec 37608. The present one is preferred since it does not use any dummy variable. That ℝ-Vec could be defined with LVec in place of LMod is a consequence of bj-isrvec2 37614. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ℝ-Vec = (LMod ∩ (◡Scalar “ {ℝfld})) | ||
| Theorem | bj-isrvec 37608 | The predicate "is a real vector space". Using df-sca 17236 instead of scaid 17278 shortens the proof by two syntactic steps, but it is preferable not to rely on the precise definition df-sca 17236. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ ℝ-Vec ↔ (𝑉 ∈ LMod ∧ (Scalar‘𝑉) = ℝfld)) | ||
| Theorem | bj-rvecmod 37609 | Real vector spaces are modules (elemental version). (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ ℝ-Vec → 𝑉 ∈ LMod) | ||
| Theorem | bj-rvecssmod 37610 | Real vector spaces are modules. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ ℝ-Vec ⊆ LMod | ||
| Theorem | bj-rvecrr 37611 | The field of scalars of a real vector space is the field of real numbers. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ ℝ-Vec → (Scalar‘𝑉) = ℝfld) | ||
| Theorem | bj-isrvecd 37612 | The predicate "is a real vector space". (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (Scalar‘𝑉) = 𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑉 ∈ ℝ-Vec ↔ (𝑉 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐾 = ℝfld))) | ||
| Theorem | bj-rvecvec 37613 | Real vector spaces are vector spaces (elemental version). (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ ℝ-Vec → 𝑉 ∈ LVec) | ||
| Theorem | bj-isrvec2 37614 | The predicate "is a real vector space". (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (Scalar‘𝑉) = 𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑉 ∈ ℝ-Vec ↔ (𝑉 ∈ LVec ∧ 𝐾 = ℝfld))) | ||
| Theorem | bj-rvecssvec 37615 | Real vector spaces are vector spaces. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ ℝ-Vec ⊆ LVec | ||
| Theorem | bj-rveccmod 37616 | Real vector spaces are subcomplex modules (elemental version). (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ ℝ-Vec → 𝑉 ∈ ℂMod) | ||
| Theorem | bj-rvecsscmod 37617 | Real vector spaces are subcomplex modules. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ ℝ-Vec ⊆ ℂMod | ||
| Theorem | bj-rvecsscvec 37618 | Real vector spaces are subcomplex vector spaces. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ ℝ-Vec ⊆ ℂVec | ||
| Theorem | bj-rveccvec 37619 | Real vector spaces are subcomplex vector spaces (elemental version). (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ ℝ-Vec → 𝑉 ∈ ℂVec) | ||
| Theorem | bj-rvecssabl 37620 | (The additive groups of) real vector spaces are commutative groups. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ℝ-Vec ⊆ Abel | ||
| Theorem | bj-rvecabl 37621 | (The additive groups of) real vector spaces are commutative groups (elemental version). (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ-Vec → 𝐴 ∈ Abel) | ||
Some lemmas to ease algebraic manipulations. | ||
| Theorem | bj-subcom 37622 | A consequence of commutativity of multiplication. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) − (𝐵 · 𝐴)) = 0) | ||
| Theorem | bj-lineqi 37623 | Solution of a (scalar) linear equation. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝑋) + 𝐵) = 𝑌) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = ((𝑌 − 𝐵) / 𝐴)) | ||
Lemmas about barycentric coordinates. For the moment, this is limited to the one-dimensional case (complex line), where existence and uniqueness of barycentric coordinates are proved by bj-bary1 37626 (which computes them). It would be nice to prove the two-dimensional case (is it easier to use ad hoc computations, or Cramer formulas?), in order to do some planar geometry. | ||
| Theorem | bj-bary1lem 37624 | Lemma for bj-bary1 37626: expression for a barycenter of two points in one dimension (complex line). (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = ((((𝐵 − 𝑋) / (𝐵 − 𝐴)) · 𝐴) + (((𝑋 − 𝐴) / (𝐵 − 𝐴)) · 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | bj-bary1lem1 37625 | Lemma for bj-bary1 37626: computation of one of the two barycentric coordinates of a barycenter of two points in one dimension (complex line). (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋 = ((𝑆 · 𝐴) + (𝑇 · 𝐵)) ∧ (𝑆 + 𝑇) = 1) → 𝑇 = ((𝑋 − 𝐴) / (𝐵 − 𝐴)))) | ||
| Theorem | bj-bary1 37626 | Barycentric coordinates in one dimension (complex line). In the statement, 𝑋 is the barycenter of the two points 𝐴, 𝐵 with respective normalized coefficients 𝑆, 𝑇. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋 = ((𝑆 · 𝐴) + (𝑇 · 𝐵)) ∧ (𝑆 + 𝑇) = 1) ↔ (𝑆 = ((𝐵 − 𝑋) / (𝐵 − 𝐴)) ∧ 𝑇 = ((𝑋 − 𝐴) / (𝐵 − 𝐴))))) | ||
| Syntax | cend 37627 | Token for the monoid of endomorphisms. |
| class End | ||
| Definition | df-bj-end 37628* | The monoid of endomorphisms on an object of a category. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ End = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑐) ↦ {〈(Base‘ndx), (𝑥(Hom ‘𝑐)𝑥)〉, 〈(+g‘ndx), (〈𝑥, 𝑥〉(comp‘𝑐)𝑥)〉})) | ||
| Theorem | bj-endval 37629 | Value of the monoid of endomorphisms on an object of a category. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Apr-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((End ‘𝐶)‘𝑋) = {〈(Base‘ndx), (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑋)〉, 〈(+g‘ndx), (〈𝑋, 𝑋〉(comp‘𝐶)𝑋)〉}) | ||
| Theorem | bj-endbase 37630 | Base set of the monoid of endomorphisms on an object of a category. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Apr-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘((End ‘𝐶)‘𝑋)) = (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | bj-endcomp 37631 | Composition law of the monoid of endomorphisms on an object of a category. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Apr-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (+g‘((End ‘𝐶)‘𝑋)) = (〈𝑋, 𝑋〉(comp‘𝐶)𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | bj-endmnd 37632 | The monoid of endomorphisms on an object of a category is a monoid. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Apr-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((End ‘𝐶)‘𝑋) ∈ Mnd) | ||
| Theorem | taupilem3 37633 | Lemma for tau-related theorems. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Feb-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℝ+ ∩ (◡cos “ {1})) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ (cos‘𝐴) = 1)) | ||
| Theorem | taupilemrplb 37634* | A set of positive reals has (in the reals) a lower bound. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2019.) |
| ⊢ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (ℝ+ ∩ 𝐴)𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 | ||
| Theorem | taupilem1 37635 | Lemma for taupi 37637. A positive real whose cosine is one is at least 2 · π. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ (cos‘𝐴) = 1) → (2 · π) ≤ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | taupilem2 37636 | Lemma for taupi 37637. The smallest positive real whose cosine is one is at most 2 · π. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2019.) (Revised by AV, 1-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ τ ≤ (2 · π) | ||
| Theorem | taupi 37637 | Relationship between τ and π. This can be seen as connecting the ratio of a circle's circumference to its radius and the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2019.) (Revised by AV, 1-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ τ = (2 · π) | ||
| Theorem | dfgcd3 37638* | Alternate definition of the gcd operator. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Dec-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = (℩𝑑 ∈ ℕ0 ∀𝑧 ∈ ℤ (𝑧 ∥ 𝑑 ↔ (𝑧 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑧 ∥ 𝑁)))) | ||
| Theorem | irrdifflemf 37639 | Lemma for irrdiff 37640. The forward direction. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ ℚ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ ℚ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℚ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ≠ 𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝑄)) ≠ (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝑅))) | ||
| Theorem | irrdiff 37640* | The irrationals are exactly those reals that are a different distance from every rational. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (¬ 𝐴 ∈ ℚ ↔ ∀𝑞 ∈ ℚ ∀𝑟 ∈ ℚ (𝑞 ≠ 𝑟 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝑞)) ≠ (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝑟))))) | ||
| Theorem | qdiff 37641* | The rationals are exactly those reals for which there exist two distinct rationals that are the same distance from the original number. Similar to irrdiff 37640 but here proved with a proof which would also work in constructive mathematics. From an online post by Ingo Blechschmidt. For a proof using irrdiff 37640, see qdiffALT 37642. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Apr-2026.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 ∈ ℚ ↔ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℚ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℚ (𝑞 ≠ 𝑟 ∧ (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝑞)) = (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝑟))))) | ||
| Theorem | qdiffALT 37642* | Alternate proof of qdiff 37641. This is a proof from irrdiff 37640 using excluded middle in a variety of places. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Apr-2026.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 ∈ ℚ ↔ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℚ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℚ (𝑞 ≠ 𝑟 ∧ (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝑞)) = (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝑟))))) | ||
| Theorem | iccioo01 37643 | The closed unit interval is equinumerous to the open unit interval. Based on a Mastodon post by Michael Kinyon. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Jun-2024.) |
| ⊢ (0[,]1) ≈ (0(,)1) | ||
| Theorem | csbrecsg 37644 | Move class substitution in and out of recs. (Contributed by ML, 25-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌recs(𝐹) = recs(⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | csbrdgg 37645 | Move class substitution in and out of the recursive function generator. (Contributed by ML, 25-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌rec(𝐹, 𝐼) = rec(⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹, ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐼)) | ||
| Theorem | csboprabg 37646* | Move class substitution in and out of class abstractions of nested ordered pairs. (Contributed by ML, 25-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{〈〈𝑦, 𝑧〉, 𝑑〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {〈〈𝑦, 𝑧〉, 𝑑〉 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑}) | ||
| Theorem | csbmpo123 37647* | Move class substitution in and out of maps-to notation for operations. (Contributed by ML, 25-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝑦 ∈ 𝑌, 𝑧 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ 𝐷) = (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑌, 𝑧 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑍 ↦ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | con1bii2 37648 | A contraposition inference. (Contributed by ML, 18-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | con2bii2 37649 | A contraposition inference. (Contributed by ML, 18-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | vtoclefex 37650* | Implicit substitution of a class for a setvar variable. (Contributed by ML, 17-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | rnmptsn 37651* | The range of a function mapping to singletons. (Contributed by ML, 15-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ {𝑥}) = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢 = {𝑥}} | ||
| Theorem | f1omptsnlem 37652* | This is the core of the proof of f1omptsn 37653, but to avoid the distinct variables on the definitions, we split this proof into two. (Contributed by ML, 15-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ {𝑥}) & ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢 = {𝑥}} ⇒ ⊢ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝑅 | ||
| Theorem | f1omptsn 37653* | A function mapping to singletons is bijective onto a set of singletons. (Contributed by ML, 16-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ {𝑥}) & ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢 = {𝑥}} ⇒ ⊢ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝑅 | ||
| Theorem | mptsnunlem 37654* | This is the core of the proof of mptsnun 37655, but to avoid the distinct variables on the definitions, we split this proof into two. (Contributed by ML, 16-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ {𝑥}) & ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢 = {𝑥}} ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝐵 = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | mptsnun 37655* | A class 𝐵 is equal to the union of the class of all singletons of elements of 𝐵. (Contributed by ML, 16-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ {𝑥}) & ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢 = {𝑥}} ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝐵 = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | dissneqlem 37656* | This is the core of the proof of dissneq 37657, but to avoid the distinct variables on the definitions, we split this proof into two. (Contributed by ML, 16-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢 = {𝑥}} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (TopOn‘𝐴)) → 𝐵 = 𝒫 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | dissneq 37657* | Any topology that contains every single-point set is the discrete topology. (Contributed by ML, 16-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢 = {𝑥}} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (TopOn‘𝐴)) → 𝐵 = 𝒫 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | exlimim 37658* | Closed form of exlimimd 37659. (Contributed by ML, 17-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)) → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | exlimimd 37659* | Existential elimination rule of natural deduction. (Contributed by ML, 17-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | exellim 37660* | Closed form of exellimddv 37661. See also exlimim 37658 for a more general theorem. (Contributed by ML, 17-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)) → 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | exellimddv 37661* | Eliminate an antecedent when the antecedent is elementhood, deduction version. See exellim 37660 for the closed form, which requires the use of a universal quantifier. (Contributed by ML, 17-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | topdifinfindis 37662* | Part of Exercise 3 of [Munkres] p. 83. The topology of all subsets 𝑥 of 𝐴 such that the complement of 𝑥 in 𝐴 is infinite, or 𝑥 is the empty set, or 𝑥 is all of 𝐴, is the trivial topology when 𝐴 is finite. (Contributed by ML, 14-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ (¬ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥) ∈ Fin ∨ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴))} ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → 𝑇 = {∅, 𝐴}) | ||
| Theorem | topdifinffinlem 37663* | This is the core of the proof of topdifinffin 37664, but to avoid the distinct variables on the definition, we need to split this proof into two. (Contributed by ML, 17-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ (¬ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥) ∈ Fin ∨ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴))} ⇒ ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (TopOn‘𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | topdifinffin 37664* | Part of Exercise 3 of [Munkres] p. 83. The topology of all subsets 𝑥 of 𝐴 such that the complement of 𝑥 in 𝐴 is infinite, or 𝑥 is the empty set, or 𝑥 is all of 𝐴, is a topology only if 𝐴 is finite. (Contributed by ML, 17-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ (¬ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥) ∈ Fin ∨ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴))} ⇒ ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (TopOn‘𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | topdifinf 37665* | Part of Exercise 3 of [Munkres] p. 83. The topology of all subsets 𝑥 of 𝐴 such that the complement of 𝑥 in 𝐴 is infinite, or 𝑥 is the empty set, or 𝑥 is all of 𝐴, is a topology if and only if 𝐴 is finite, in which case it is the trivial topology. (Contributed by ML, 17-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ (¬ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥) ∈ Fin ∨ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴))} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (TopOn‘𝐴) ↔ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ (TopOn‘𝐴) → 𝑇 = {∅, 𝐴})) | ||
| Theorem | topdifinfeq 37666* | Two different ways of defining the collection from Exercise 3 of [Munkres] p. 83. (Contributed by ML, 18-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ (¬ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥) ∈ Fin ∨ ((𝐴 ∖ 𝑥) = ∅ ∨ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥) = 𝐴))} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ (¬ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥) ∈ Fin ∨ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴))} | ||
| Theorem | icorempo 37667* | Closed-below, open-above intervals of reals. (Contributed by ML, 26-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = ([,) ↾ (ℝ × ℝ)) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ (𝑥 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝑦)}) | ||
| Theorem | icoreresf 37668 | Closed-below, open-above intervals of reals map to subsets of reals. (Contributed by ML, 25-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ ([,) ↾ (ℝ × ℝ)):(ℝ × ℝ)⟶𝒫 ℝ | ||
| Theorem | icoreval 37669* | Value of the closed-below, open-above interval function on reals. (Contributed by ML, 26-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴[,)𝐵) = {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ (𝐴 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝐵)}) | ||
| Theorem | icoreelrnab 37670* | Elementhood in the set of closed-below, open-above intervals of reals. (Contributed by ML, 27-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = ([,) “ (ℝ × ℝ)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐼 ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℝ 𝑋 = {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ (𝑎 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝑏)}) | ||
| Theorem | isbasisrelowllem1 37671* | Lemma for isbasisrelowl 37674. (Contributed by ML, 27-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = ([,) “ (ℝ × ℝ)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ (𝑎 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝑏)}) ∧ (𝑐 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑑 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ (𝑐 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝑑)})) ∧ (𝑎 ≤ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑏 ≤ 𝑑)) → (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) ∈ 𝐼) | ||
| Theorem | isbasisrelowllem2 37672* | Lemma for isbasisrelowl 37674. (Contributed by ML, 27-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = ([,) “ (ℝ × ℝ)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ (𝑎 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝑏)}) ∧ (𝑐 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑑 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ (𝑐 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝑑)})) ∧ (𝑎 ≤ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑑 ≤ 𝑏)) → (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) ∈ 𝐼) | ||
| Theorem | icoreclin 37673* | The set of closed-below, open-above intervals of reals is closed under finite intersection. (Contributed by ML, 27-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = ([,) “ (ℝ × ℝ)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐼) → (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) ∈ 𝐼) | ||
| Theorem | isbasisrelowl 37674 | The set of all closed-below, open-above intervals of reals form a basis. (Contributed by ML, 27-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = ([,) “ (ℝ × ℝ)) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐼 ∈ TopBases | ||
| Theorem | icoreunrn 37675 | The union of all closed-below, open-above intervals of reals is the set of reals. (Contributed by ML, 27-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = ([,) “ (ℝ × ℝ)) ⇒ ⊢ ℝ = ∪ 𝐼 | ||
| Theorem | istoprelowl 37676 | The set of all closed-below, open-above intervals of reals generate a topology on the reals. (Contributed by ML, 27-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = ([,) “ (ℝ × ℝ)) ⇒ ⊢ (topGen‘𝐼) ∈ (TopOn‘ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | icoreelrn 37677* | A class abstraction which is an element of the set of closed-below, open-above intervals of reals. (Contributed by ML, 1-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = ([,) “ (ℝ × ℝ)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ (𝐴 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝐵)} ∈ 𝐼) | ||
| Theorem | iooelexlt 37678* | An element of an open interval is not its smallest element. (Contributed by ML, 2-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (𝐴(,)𝐵) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝐴(,)𝐵)𝑦 < 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | relowlssretop 37679 | The lower limit topology on the reals is finer than the standard topology. (Contributed by ML, 1-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = ([,) “ (ℝ × ℝ)) ⇒ ⊢ (topGen‘ran (,)) ⊆ (topGen‘𝐼) | ||
| Theorem | relowlpssretop 37680 | The lower limit topology on the reals is strictly finer than the standard topology. (Contributed by ML, 2-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = ([,) “ (ℝ × ℝ)) ⇒ ⊢ (topGen‘ran (,)) ⊊ (topGen‘𝐼) | ||
| Theorem | sucneqond 37681 | Inequality of an ordinal set with its successor. Does not use the axiom of regularity. (Contributed by ML, 18-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = suc 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ On) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) | ||
| Theorem | sucneqoni 37682 | Inequality of an ordinal set with its successor. Does not use the axiom of regularity. (Contributed by ML, 18-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 = suc 𝑌 & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ On ⇒ ⊢ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌 | ||
| Theorem | onsucuni3 37683 | If an ordinal number has a predecessor, then it is successor of that predecessor. (Contributed by ML, 17-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ Lim 𝐵) → 𝐵 = suc ∪ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | 1oequni2o 37684 | The ordinal number 1o is the predecessor of the ordinal number 2o. (Contributed by ML, 19-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ 1o = ∪ 2o | ||
| Theorem | rdgsucuni 37685 | If an ordinal number has a predecessor, the value of the recursive definition generator at that number in terms of its predecessor. (Contributed by ML, 17-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ Lim 𝐵) → (rec(𝐹, 𝐼)‘𝐵) = (𝐹‘(rec(𝐹, 𝐼)‘∪ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | rdgeqoa 37686 | If a recursive function with an initial value 𝐴 at step 𝑁 is equal to itself with an initial value 𝐵 at step 𝑀, then every finite number of successor steps will also be equal. (Contributed by ML, 21-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ On ∧ 𝑀 ∈ On ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ω) → ((rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝑁) = (rec(𝐹, 𝐵)‘𝑀) → (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘(𝑁 +o 𝑋)) = (rec(𝐹, 𝐵)‘(𝑀 +o 𝑋)))) | ||
| Theorem | elxp8 37687 | Membership in a Cartesian product. This version requires no quantifiers or dummy variables. See also elxp7 7977. (Contributed by ML, 19-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ ((1st ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (V × 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | cbveud 37688* | Deduction used to change bound variables in an existential uniqueness quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by ML, 27-Mar-2021.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑦𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | cbvreud 37689* | Deduction used to change bound variables in a restricted existential uniqueness quantifier. (Contributed by ML, 27-Mar-2021.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | difunieq 37690 | The difference of unions is a subset of the union of the difference. (Contributed by ML, 29-Mar-2021.) |
| ⊢ (∪ 𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐵) ⊆ ∪ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | inunissunidif 37691 | Theorem about subsets of the difference of unions. (Contributed by ML, 29-Mar-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ ∪ 𝐶) = ∅ → (𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | rdgellim 37692 | Elementhood in a recursive definition at a limit ordinal. (Contributed by ML, 30-Mar-2022.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ On ∧ Lim 𝐵) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ∈ (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐶) → 𝑋 ∈ (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | rdglimss 37693 | A recursive definition at a limit ordinal is a superset of itself at any smaller ordinal. (Contributed by ML, 30-Mar-2022.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ On ∧ Lim 𝐵) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) → (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐶) ⊆ (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | rdgssun 37694* | In a recursive definition where each step expands on the previous one using a union, every previous step is a subset of every later step. (Contributed by ML, 1-Apr-2022.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ 𝐵)) & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ On ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑋) → (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝑌) ⊆ (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | exrecfnlem 37695* | Lemma for exrecfn 37696. (Contributed by ML, 30-Mar-2022.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑧 ∪ ran (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ↦ 𝐵))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑦 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ∃𝑥(𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | exrecfn 37696* | Theorem about the existence of infinite recursive sets. 𝑦 should usually be free in 𝐵. (Contributed by ML, 30-Mar-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑦 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ∃𝑥(𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | exrecfnpw 37697* | For any base set, a set which contains the powerset of all of its own elements exists. (Contributed by ML, 30-Mar-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∃𝑥(𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝒫 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | finorwe 37698 | If the Axiom of Infinity is denied, every total order is a well-order. The notion of a well-order cannot be usefully expressed without the Axiom of Infinity due to the inability to quantify over proper classes. (Contributed by ML, 5-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ (¬ ω ∈ V → ( < Or 𝐴 → < We 𝐴)) | ||
| Syntax | cfinxp 37699 | Extend the definition of a class to include Cartesian exponentiation. |
| class (𝑈↑↑𝑁) | ||
| Definition | df-finxp 37700* |
Define Cartesian exponentiation on a class.
Note that this definition is limited to finite exponents, since it is defined using nested ordered pairs. If tuples of infinite length are needed, or if they might be needed in the future, use df-ixp 8846 or df-map 8775 instead. The main advantage of this definition is that it integrates better with functions and relations. For example if 𝑅 is a subset of (𝐴↑↑2o), then df-br 5086 can be used on it, and df-fv 6506 can also be used, and so on. It's also worth keeping in mind that ((𝑈↑↑𝑀) × (𝑈↑↑𝑁)) is generally not equal to (𝑈↑↑(𝑀 +o 𝑁)). This definition is technical. Use finxp1o 37708 and finxpsuc 37714 for a more standard recursive experience. (Contributed by ML, 16-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝑈↑↑𝑁) = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ ∅ = (rec((𝑛 ∈ ω, 𝑥 ∈ V ↦ if((𝑛 = 1o ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈), ∅, if(𝑥 ∈ (V × 𝑈), 〈∪ 𝑛, (1st ‘𝑥)〉, 〈𝑛, 𝑥〉))), 〈𝑁, 𝑦〉)‘𝑁))} | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |