Theorem copsex2gd 37387

Description: Implicit substitution inference for ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.) Use a similar proof to copsex4g 5451 to reduce axiom usage. (Revised by SN, 1-Sep-2024.) Adapt copsex2g 5449 $p to deduction form. (Revised by BJ, 28-Mar-2026.) Do not use copsex2g 5449. (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
copsex2gd.is	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
copsex2gd	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)) → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓) ↔ 𝜒))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝜑   𝜒,𝑥,𝑦   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦)   𝑉(𝑥,𝑦)   𝑊(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem copsex2gd

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqcom 2744	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ = ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)
2		vex 3446	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
3		vex 3446	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
4	2, 3	opth 5432	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ = ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ↔ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵))
5	1, 4	bitri 275	. . . 4 ⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ↔ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵))
6	5	anbi1i 625	. . 3 ⊢ ((⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) ∧ 𝜓))
7	6	2exbii 1851	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) ∧ 𝜓))
8		simpr 484	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵))
9		copsex2gd.is	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
10	8, 9	cgsex2gd 37386	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)) → (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) ∧ 𝜓) ↔ 𝜒))
11	7, 10	bitrid 283	1 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)) → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓) ↔ 𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1542  ∃wex 1781   ∈ wcel 2114  ⟨cop 4588

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5243  ax-pr 5379

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2812  df-rab 3402  df-v 3444  df-dif 3906  df-un 3908  df-ss 3920  df-nul 4288  df-if 4482  df-sn 4583  df-pr 4585  df-op 4589

This theorem is referenced by: (None)