| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > eqbrrdv | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Deduction from extensionality principle for relations. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| eqbrrdv.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → Rel 𝐴) |
| eqbrrdv.2 | ⊢ (𝜑 → Rel 𝐵) |
| eqbrrdv.3 | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥𝐴𝑦 ↔ 𝑥𝐵𝑦)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| eqbrrdv | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | eqbrrdv.3 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥𝐴𝑦 ↔ 𝑥𝐵𝑦)) | |
| 2 | df-br 5109 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥𝐴𝑦 ↔ 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ 𝐴) | |
| 3 | df-br 5109 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥𝐵𝑦 ↔ 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ 𝐵) | |
| 4 | 1, 2, 3 | 3bitr3g 316 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ 𝐵)) |
| 5 | 4 | alrimivv 1957 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦(〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ 𝐵)) |
| 6 | eqbrrdv.1 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → Rel 𝐴) | |
| 7 | eqbrrdv.2 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → Rel 𝐵) | |
| 8 | eqrel 5769 | . . 3 ⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ Rel 𝐵) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ 𝐵))) | |
| 9 | 6, 7, 8 | syl2anc 595 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ 𝐵))) |
| 10 | 5, 9 | mpbird 260 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| This proof depends on syntax axioms: → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∀wal 1567 = wceq 1569 ∈ wcel 2142 〈cop 4594 class class class wbr 5108 Rel wrel 5665 |
| This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1824 ax-4 1838 ax-5 1939 ax-6 1996 ax-7 2037 ax-8 2144 ax-9 2152 ax-ext 2734 |
| This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 401 df-tru 1572 df-ex 1809 df-sb 2096 df-clab 2741 df-cleq 2754 df-clel 2837 df-v 3456 df-ss 3921 df-br 5109 df-opab 5173 df-xp 5666 df-rel 5667 |
| This theorem is used by: eqbrrdva 5854 oppcsect2 17842 qusxpid 19257 erimeq2 39440 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |