P. 58 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 5701-5800   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	eqrelriv 5701*	Inference from extensionality principle for relations. (Contributed by FL, 15-Oct-2012.)
⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ Rel 𝐵) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	eqrelriiv 5702*	Inference from extensionality principle for relations. (Contributed by NM, 17-Mar-1995.)
⊢ Rel 𝐴    &   ⊢ Rel 𝐵    &   ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵
Theorem	eqbrriv 5703*	Inference from extensionality principle for relations. (Contributed by NM, 12-Dec-2006.)
⊢ Rel 𝐴    &   ⊢ Rel 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝑥𝐴𝑦 ↔ 𝑥𝐵𝑦)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵
Theorem	eqrelrdv 5704*	Deduce equality of relations from equivalence of membership. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 10-Oct-2010.)
⊢ Rel 𝐴    &   ⊢ Rel 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	eqbrrdv 5705*	Deduction from extensionality principle for relations. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Rel 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Rel 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥𝐴𝑦 ↔ 𝑥𝐵𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	eqbrrdiv 5706*	Deduction from extensionality principle for relations. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 10-Oct-2010.)
⊢ Rel 𝐴    &   ⊢ Rel 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥𝐴𝑦 ↔ 𝑥𝐵𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	eqrelrdv2 5707*	A version of eqrelrdv 5704. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 10-Oct-2010.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (((Rel 𝐴 ∧ Rel 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	ssrelrel 5708*	A subclass relationship determined by ordered triples. Use relrelss 6180 to express the antecedent in terms of the relation predicate. (Contributed by NM, 17-Dec-2008.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ((V × V) × V) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐵)))
Theorem	eqrelrel 5709*	Extensionality principle for ordered triples (used by 2-place operations df-oprab 7288), analogous to eqrel 5696. Use relrelss 6180 to express the antecedent in terms of the relation predicate. (Contributed by NM, 17-Dec-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ⊆ ((V × V) × V) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐵)))
Theorem	elrel 5710*	A member of a relation is an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2006.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦 𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)
Theorem	rel0 5711	The empty set is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-1998.)
⊢ Rel ∅
Theorem	nrelv 5712	The universal class is not a relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Jan-2022.)
⊢ ¬ Rel V
Theorem	relsng 5713	A singleton is a relation iff it is a singleton on an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 24-Sep-2013.) (Revised by BJ, 12-Feb-2022.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (Rel {𝐴} ↔ 𝐴 ∈ (V × V)))
Theorem	relsnb 5714	An at-most-singleton is a relation iff it is empty (because it is a "singleton on a proper class") or it is a singleton of an ordered pair. (Contributed by BJ, 26-Feb-2023.)
⊢ (Rel {𝐴} ↔ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V ∨ 𝐴 ∈ (V × V)))
Theorem	relsnopg 5715	A singleton of an ordered pair is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1998.) (Revised by BJ, 12-Feb-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → Rel {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩})
Theorem	relsn 5716	A singleton is a relation iff it is an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 24-Sep-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (Rel {𝐴} ↔ 𝐴 ∈ (V × V))
Theorem	relsnop 5717	A singleton of an ordered pair is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ Rel {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}
Theorem	copsex2gb 5718*	Implicit substitution inference for ordered pairs. Compare copsex2ga 5719. (Contributed by NM, 12-Mar-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	copsex2ga 5719*	Implicit substitution inference for ordered pairs. Compare copsex2g 5408. (Contributed by NM, 26-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑊) → (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
Theorem	elopaba 5720*	Membership in an ordered-pair class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	xpsspw 5721	A Cartesian product is included in the power of the power of the union of its arguments. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2006.)
⊢ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ⊆ 𝒫 𝒫 (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)
Theorem	unixpss 5722	The double class union of a Cartesian product is included in the union of its arguments. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-2006.)
⊢ ∪ ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)
Theorem	relun 5723	The union of two relations is a relation. Compare Exercise 5 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (Rel (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ Rel 𝐵))
Theorem	relin1 5724	The intersection with a relation is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → Rel (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))
Theorem	relin2 5725	The intersection with a relation is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-2006.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐵 → Rel (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))
Theorem	relinxp 5726	Intersection with a Cartesian product is a relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 4-Mar-2019.)
⊢ Rel (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))
Theorem	reldif 5727	A difference cutting down a relation is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1998.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → Rel (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵))
Theorem	reliun 5728	An indexed union is a relation iff each member of its indexed family is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 19-Dec-2008.)
⊢ (Rel ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Rel 𝐵)
Theorem	reliin 5729	An indexed intersection is a relation if at least one of the member of the indexed family is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-2014.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Rel 𝐵 → Rel ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵)
Theorem	reluni 5730*	The union of a class is a relation iff any member is a relation. Exercise 6 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25 and its converse. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (Rel ∪ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Rel 𝑥)
Theorem	relint 5731*	The intersection of a class is a relation if at least one member is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-2014.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Rel 𝑥 → Rel ∩ 𝐴)
Theorem	relopabiv 5732*	A class of ordered pairs is a relation. For a version without a disjoint variable condition, but a longer proof using ax-11 2155 and ax-12 2172, see relopabi 5734. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jul-2023.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ Rel 𝐴
Theorem	relopabv 5733*	A class of ordered pairs is a relation. For a version without a disjoint variable condition, but using ax-11 2155 and ax-12 2172, see relopab 5736. (Contributed by SN, 8-Sep-2024.)
⊢ Rel {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	relopabi 5734	A class of ordered pairs is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Dec-2013.) Remove dependency on ax-sep 5224, ax-nul 5231, ax-pr 5353. (Revised by KP, 25-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ Rel 𝐴
Theorem	relopabiALT 5735	Alternate proof of relopabi 5734 (shorter but uses more axioms). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Dec-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ Rel 𝐴
Theorem	relopab 5736	A class of ordered pairs is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-1995.) Remove disjoint variable conditions. (Revised by Alan Sare, 9-Jul-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 21-Dec-2013.)
⊢ Rel {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	mptrel 5737	The maps-to notation always describes a binary relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Apr-2012.)
⊢ Rel (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)
Theorem	reli 5738	The identity relation is a relation. Part of Exercise 4.12(p) of [Mendelson] p. 235. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-Dec-2013.)
⊢ Rel I
Theorem	rele 5739	The membership relation is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-Dec-2013.)
⊢ Rel E
Theorem	opabid2 5740*	A relation expressed as an ordered pair abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 11-Dec-2006.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴)
Theorem	inopab 5741*	Intersection of two ordered pair class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2002.)
⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓}) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)}
Theorem	difopab 5742*	Difference of two ordered-pair class abstractions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.) (Proof shortened by SN, 19-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∖ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓}) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)}
Theorem	difopabOLD 5743*	Obsolete version of difopab 5742 as of 19-Dec-2024. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∖ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓}) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)}
Theorem	inxp 5744	Intersection of two Cartesian products. Exercise 9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ∩ (𝐶 × 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) × (𝐵 ∩ 𝐷))
Theorem	xpindi 5745	Distributive law for Cartesian product over intersection. Theorem 102 of [Suppes] p. 52. (Contributed by NM, 26-Sep-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 × (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐶))
Theorem	xpindir 5746	Distributive law for Cartesian product over intersection. Similar to Theorem 102 of [Suppes] p. 52. (Contributed by NM, 26-Sep-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) × 𝐶) = ((𝐴 × 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 × 𝐶))
Theorem	xpiindi 5747*	Distributive law for Cartesian product over indexed intersection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (𝐶 × ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) = ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵))
Theorem	xpriindi 5748*	Distributive law for Cartesian product over relativized indexed intersection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.)
⊢ (𝐶 × (𝐷 ∩ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵)) = ((𝐶 × 𝐷) ∩ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵))
Theorem	eliunxp 5749*	Membership in a union of Cartesian products. Analogue of elxp 5613 for nonconstant 𝐵(𝑥). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐶 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)))
Theorem	opeliunxp2 5750*	Membership in a union of Cartesian products. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → 𝐵 = 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐸))
Theorem	raliunxp 5751*	Write a double restricted quantification as one universal quantifier. In this version of ralxp 5753, 𝐵(𝑦) is not assumed to be constant. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑦} × 𝐵)𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	rexiunxp 5752*	Write a double restricted quantification as one universal quantifier. In this version of rexxp 5754, 𝐵(𝑦) is not assumed to be constant. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑦} × 𝐵)𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	ralxp 5753*	Universal quantification restricted to a Cartesian product is equivalent to a double restricted quantification. The hypothesis specifies an implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	rexxp 5754*	Existential quantification restricted to a Cartesian product is equivalent to a double restricted quantification. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	exopxfr 5755*	Transfer ordered-pair existence from/to single variable existence. (Contributed by NM, 26-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ (V × V)𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧𝜓)
Theorem	exopxfr2 5756*	Transfer ordered-pair existence from/to single variable existence. (Contributed by NM, 26-Feb-2014.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)))
Theorem	djussxp 5757*	Disjoint union is a subset of a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐴 × V)
Theorem	ralxpf 5758*	Version of ralxp 5753 with bound-variable hypotheses. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	rexxpf 5759*	Version of rexxp 5754 with bound-variable hypotheses. (Contributed by NM, 19-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	iunxpf 5760*	Indexed union on a Cartesian product equals a double indexed union. The hypothesis specifies an implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 19-Dec-2008.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐶    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝐶    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐷    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)𝐶 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∪ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷
Theorem	opabbi2dv 5761*	Deduce equality of a relation and an ordered-pair class abstraction. Compare abbi2dv 2878. (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2014.)
⊢ Rel 𝐴    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓})
Theorem	relop 5762*	A necessary and sufficient condition for a Kuratowski ordered pair to be a relation. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2008.) A relation is a class of ordered pairs, so the fact that an ordered pair may sometimes be itself a relation is an "accident" depending on the specific encoding of ordered pairs as classes (in set.mm, the Kuratowski encoding). A more meaningful statement is relsnopg 5715, as funsng 6492 is to funop 7030. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (Rel ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐴 = {𝑥} ∧ 𝐵 = {𝑥, 𝑦}))
Theorem	ideqg 5763	For sets, the identity relation is the same as equality. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 I 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	ideq 5764	For sets, the identity relation is the same as equality. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 I 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	ididg 5765	A set is identical to itself. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-2008.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 I 𝐴)
Theorem	issetid 5766	Two ways of expressing set existence. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-2008.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ 𝐴 I 𝐴)
Theorem	coss1 5767	Subclass theorem for composition. (Contributed by FL, 30-Dec-2010.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 ∘ 𝐶))
Theorem	coss2 5768	Subclass theorem for composition. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ∘ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐶 ∘ 𝐵))
Theorem	coeq1 5769	Equality theorem for composition of two classes. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-1997.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∘ 𝐶))
Theorem	coeq2 5770	Equality theorem for composition of two classes. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-1997.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐶 ∘ 𝐴) = (𝐶 ∘ 𝐵))
Theorem	coeq1i 5771	Equality inference for composition of two classes. (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-2000.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∘ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∘ 𝐶)
Theorem	coeq2i 5772	Equality inference for composition of two classes. (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-2000.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∘ 𝐴) = (𝐶 ∘ 𝐵)
Theorem	coeq1d 5773	Equality deduction for composition of two classes. (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-2000.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∘ 𝐶))
Theorem	coeq2d 5774	Equality deduction for composition of two classes. (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-2000.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∘ 𝐴) = (𝐶 ∘ 𝐵))
Theorem	coeq12i 5775	Equality inference for composition of two classes. (Contributed by FL, 7-Jun-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐷    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∘ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∘ 𝐷)
Theorem	coeq12d 5776	Equality deduction for composition of two classes. (Contributed by FL, 7-Jun-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∘ 𝐷))
Theorem	nfco 5777	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for function value. (Contributed by NM, 1-Sep-1999.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐴 ∘ 𝐵)
Theorem	brcog 5778*	Ordered pair membership in a composition. (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴(𝐶 ∘ 𝐷)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴𝐷𝑥 ∧ 𝑥𝐶𝐵)))
Theorem	opelco2g 5779*	Ordered pair membership in a composition. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jan-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ (𝐶 ∘ 𝐷) ↔ ∃𝑥(⟨𝐴, 𝑥⟩ ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ⟨𝑥, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝐶)))
Theorem	brcogw 5780	Ordered pair membership in a composition. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Jan-2018.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑍) ∧ (𝐴𝐷𝑋 ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝐵)) → 𝐴(𝐶 ∘ 𝐷)𝐵)
Theorem	eqbrrdva 5781*	Deduction from extensionality principle for relations, given an equivalence only on the relation domain and range. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 28-Nov-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐶 × 𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ (𝐶 × 𝐷))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝑥𝐴𝑦 ↔ 𝑥𝐵𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	brco 5782*	Binary relation on a composition. (Contributed by NM, 21-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴(𝐶 ∘ 𝐷)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴𝐷𝑥 ∧ 𝑥𝐶𝐵))
Theorem	opelco 5783*	Ordered pair membership in a composition. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ (𝐶 ∘ 𝐷) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴𝐷𝑥 ∧ 𝑥𝐶𝐵))
Theorem	cnvss 5784	Subset theorem for converse. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.) (Proof shortened by Kyle Wyonch, 27-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ◡𝐴 ⊆ ◡𝐵)
Theorem	cnveq 5785	Equality theorem for converse relation. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ◡𝐴 = ◡𝐵)
Theorem	cnveqi 5786	Equality inference for converse relation. (Contributed by NM, 23-Dec-2008.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ◡𝐴 = ◡𝐵
Theorem	cnveqd 5787	Equality deduction for converse relation. (Contributed by NM, 6-Dec-2013.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ◡𝐴 = ◡𝐵)
Theorem	elcnv 5788*	Membership in a converse relation. Equation 5 of [Suppes] p. 62. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-1998.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ◡𝑅 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))
Theorem	elcnv2 5789*	Membership in a converse relation. Equation 5 of [Suppes] p. 62. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ◡𝑅 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩ ∈ 𝑅))
Theorem	nfcnv 5790	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for converse relation. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jan-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥◡𝐴
Theorem	brcnvg 5791	The converse of a binary relation swaps arguments. Theorem 11 of [Suppes] p. 61. (Contributed by NM, 10-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴))
Theorem	opelcnvg 5792	Ordered-pair membership in converse relation. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ ◡𝑅 ↔ ⟨𝐵, 𝐴⟩ ∈ 𝑅))
Theorem	opelcnv 5793	Ordered-pair membership in converse relation. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ ◡𝑅 ↔ ⟨𝐵, 𝐴⟩ ∈ 𝑅)
Theorem	brcnv 5794	The converse of a binary relation swaps arguments. Theorem 11 of [Suppes] p. 61. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐴)
Theorem	csbcnv 5795	Move class substitution in and out of the converse of a relation. Version of csbcnvgALT 5796 without a sethood antecedent but depending on more axioms. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Feb-2017.) (Revised by NM, 23-Aug-2018.)
⊢ ◡⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌◡𝐹
Theorem	csbcnvgALT 5796	Move class substitution in and out of the converse of a relation. Version of csbcnv 5795 with a sethood antecedent but depending on fewer axioms. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Feb-2017.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ◡⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹 = ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌◡𝐹)
Theorem	cnvco 5797	Distributive law of converse over class composition. Theorem 26 of [Suppes] p. 64. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ ◡(𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = (◡𝐵 ∘ ◡𝐴)
Theorem	cnvuni 5798*	The converse of a class union is the (indexed) union of the converses of its members. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-2004.)
⊢ ◡∪ 𝐴 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ◡𝑥
Theorem	dfdm3 5799*	Alternate definition of domain. Definition 6.5(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 24. (Contributed by NM, 28-Dec-1996.)
⊢ dom 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴}
Theorem	dfrn2 5800*	Alternate definition of range. Definition 4 of [Suppes] p. 60. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1996.)
⊢ ran 𝐴 = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑥𝐴𝑦}