P. 58 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 5701-5800   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	weinxp 5701	Intersection of well-ordering with Cartesian product of its field. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jul-2014.)
⊢ (𝑅 We 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) We 𝐴)
Theorem	posn 5702	Partial ordering of a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 Po {𝐴} ↔ ¬ 𝐴𝑅𝐴))
Theorem	sosn 5703	Strict ordering on a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 Or {𝐴} ↔ ¬ 𝐴𝑅𝐴))
Theorem	frsn 5704	Founded relation on a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Dec-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 Fr {𝐴} ↔ ¬ 𝐴𝑅𝐴))
Theorem	wesn 5705	Well-ordering of a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 We {𝐴} ↔ ¬ 𝐴𝑅𝐴))
Theorem	elopaelxp 5706*	Membership in an ordered-pair class abstraction implies membership in a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Jun-2018.) Avoid ax-sep 5234, ax-nul 5244, ax-pr 5370. (Revised by SN, 11-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} → 𝐴 ∈ (V × V))
Theorem	bropaex12 5707*	Two classes related by an ordered-pair class abstraction are sets. (Contributed by AV, 21-Jan-2020.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
Theorem	opabssxp 5708*	An abstraction relation is a subset of a related Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jul-1995.)
⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐵)
Theorem	brab2a 5709*	The law of concretion for a binary relation. Ordered pair membership in an ordered pair class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ 𝜑)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	optocl 5710*	Implicit substitution of class for ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 5-Mar-1995.) Shorten and reduce axiom usage. (Revised by TM, 29-Dec-2025.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐵 × 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 → 𝜓)
Theorem	optoclOLD 5711*	Obsolete version of optocl 5710 as of 29-Dec-2025. (Contributed by NM, 5-Mar-1995.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐵 × 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 → 𝜓)
Theorem	2optocl 5712*	Implicit substitution of classes for ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 12-Mar-1995.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (𝐶 × 𝐷)    &   ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐷)) → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑅) → 𝜒)
Theorem	3optocl 5713*	Implicit substitution of classes for ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 12-Mar-1995.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (𝐷 × 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩ = 𝐶 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐹) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐹) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝐹)) → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑅) → 𝜃)
Theorem	opbrop 5714*	Ordered pair membership in a relation. Special case. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1995.)
⊢ (((𝑧 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐵) ∧ (𝑣 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝑢 = 𝐷)) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑆)) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢((𝑥 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑢⟩) ∧ 𝜑))}    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆)) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩𝑅⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	0xp 5715	The Cartesian product with the empty set is empty. Part of Theorem 3.13(ii) of [Monk1] p. 37. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-1994.)
⊢ (∅ × 𝐴) = ∅
Theorem	csbxp 5716	Distribute proper substitution through the Cartesian product of two classes. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.) (Revised by NM, 23-Aug-2018.)
⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐵 × 𝐶) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵 × ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)
Theorem	releq 5717	Equality theorem for the relation predicate. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (Rel 𝐴 ↔ Rel 𝐵))
Theorem	releqi 5718	Equality inference for the relation predicate. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2006.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 ↔ Rel 𝐵)
Theorem	releqd 5719	Equality deduction for the relation predicate. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Rel 𝐴 ↔ Rel 𝐵))
Theorem	nfrel 5720	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a relation. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jan-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥Rel 𝐴
Theorem	sbcrel 5721	Distribute proper substitution through a relation predicate. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]Rel 𝑅 ↔ Rel ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑅))
Theorem	relss 5722	Subclass theorem for relation predicate. Theorem 2 of [Suppes] p. 58. (Contributed by NM, 15-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (Rel 𝐵 → Rel 𝐴))
Theorem	ssrel 5723*	A subclass relationship depends only on a relation's ordered pairs. Theorem 3.2(i) of [Monk1] p. 33. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Remove dependency on ax-sep 5234, ax-nul 5244, ax-pr 5370. (Revised by KP, 25-Oct-2021.) Remove dependency on ax-12 2180. (Revised by SN, 11-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵)))
Theorem	eqrel 5724*	Extensionality principle for relations. Theorem 3.2(ii) of [Monk1] p. 33. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-1994.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ Rel 𝐵) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵)))
Theorem	ssrel2 5725*	A subclass relationship depends only on a relation's ordered pairs. This version of ssrel 5723 is restricted to the relation's domain. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Jan-2018.)
⊢ (𝑅 ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐵) → (𝑅 ⊆ 𝑆 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝑅 → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝑆)))
Theorem	ssrel3 5726*	Subclass relation in another form when the subclass is a relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Feb-2019.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝐴𝑦 → 𝑥𝐵𝑦)))
Theorem	relssi 5727*	Inference from subclass principle for relations. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1998.)
⊢ Rel 𝐴    &   ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵
Theorem	relssdv 5728*	Deduction from subclass principle for relations. (Contributed by NM, 11-Sep-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Rel 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)
Theorem	eqrelriv 5729*	Inference from extensionality principle for relations. (Contributed by FL, 15-Oct-2012.)
⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ Rel 𝐵) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	eqrelriiv 5730*	Inference from extensionality principle for relations. (Contributed by NM, 17-Mar-1995.)
⊢ Rel 𝐴    &   ⊢ Rel 𝐵    &   ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵
Theorem	eqbrriv 5731*	Inference from extensionality principle for relations. (Contributed by NM, 12-Dec-2006.)
⊢ Rel 𝐴    &   ⊢ Rel 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝑥𝐴𝑦 ↔ 𝑥𝐵𝑦)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵
Theorem	eqrelrdv 5732*	Deduce equality of relations from equivalence of membership. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 10-Oct-2010.)
⊢ Rel 𝐴    &   ⊢ Rel 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	eqbrrdv 5733*	Deduction from extensionality principle for relations. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Rel 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Rel 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥𝐴𝑦 ↔ 𝑥𝐵𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	eqbrrdiv 5734*	Deduction from extensionality principle for relations. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 10-Oct-2010.)
⊢ Rel 𝐴    &   ⊢ Rel 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥𝐴𝑦 ↔ 𝑥𝐵𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	eqrelrdv2 5735*	A version of eqrelrdv 5732. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 10-Oct-2010.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (((Rel 𝐴 ∧ Rel 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	ssrelrel 5736*	A subclass relationship determined by ordered triples. Use relrelss 6220 to express the antecedent in terms of the relation predicate. (Contributed by NM, 17-Dec-2008.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ((V × V) × V) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐵)))
Theorem	eqrelrel 5737*	Extensionality principle for ordered triples (used by 2-place operations df-oprab 7350), analogous to eqrel 5724. Use relrelss 6220 to express the antecedent in terms of the relation predicate. (Contributed by NM, 17-Dec-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ⊆ ((V × V) × V) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐵)))
Theorem	elrel 5738*	A member of a relation is an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2006.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦 𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)
Theorem	rel0 5739	The empty set is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-1998.)
⊢ Rel ∅
Theorem	nrelv 5740	The universal class is not a relation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Jan-2022.)
⊢ ¬ Rel V
Theorem	relsng 5741	A singleton is a relation iff it is a singleton on an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 24-Sep-2013.) (Revised by BJ, 12-Feb-2022.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (Rel {𝐴} ↔ 𝐴 ∈ (V × V)))
Theorem	relsnb 5742	An at-most-singleton is a relation iff it is empty (because it is a "singleton on a proper class") or it is a singleton of an ordered pair. (Contributed by BJ, 26-Feb-2023.)
⊢ (Rel {𝐴} ↔ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V ∨ 𝐴 ∈ (V × V)))
Theorem	relsnopg 5743	A singleton of an ordered pair is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1998.) (Revised by BJ, 12-Feb-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → Rel {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩})
Theorem	relsn 5744	A singleton is a relation iff it is an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 24-Sep-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (Rel {𝐴} ↔ 𝐴 ∈ (V × V))
Theorem	relsnop 5745	A singleton of an ordered pair is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ Rel {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}
Theorem	copsex2gb 5746*	Implicit substitution inference for ordered pairs. Compare copsex2ga 5747. (Contributed by NM, 12-Mar-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	copsex2ga 5747*	Implicit substitution inference for ordered pairs. Compare copsex2g 5433. (Contributed by NM, 26-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑊) → (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
Theorem	elopaba 5748*	Membership in an ordered-pair class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	xpsspw 5749	A Cartesian product is included in the power of the power of the union of its arguments. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2006.)
⊢ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ⊆ 𝒫 𝒫 (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)
Theorem	unixpss 5750	The double class union of a Cartesian product is included in the union of its arguments. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-2006.)
⊢ ∪ ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)
Theorem	relun 5751	The union of two relations is a relation. Compare Exercise 5 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (Rel (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ Rel 𝐵))
Theorem	relin1 5752	The intersection with a relation is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → Rel (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))
Theorem	relin2 5753	The intersection with a relation is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-2006.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐵 → Rel (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))
Theorem	relinxp 5754	Intersection with a Cartesian product is a relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 4-Mar-2019.)
⊢ Rel (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵))
Theorem	reldif 5755	A difference cutting down a relation is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1998.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → Rel (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵))
Theorem	reliun 5756	An indexed union is a relation iff each member of its indexed family is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 19-Dec-2008.)
⊢ (Rel ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Rel 𝐵)
Theorem	reliin 5757	An indexed intersection is a relation if at least one of the member of the indexed family is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-2014.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Rel 𝐵 → Rel ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵)
Theorem	reluni 5758*	The union of a class is a relation iff any member is a relation. Exercise 6 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25 and its converse. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (Rel ∪ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Rel 𝑥)
Theorem	relint 5759*	The intersection of a class is a relation if at least one member is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-2014.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Rel 𝑥 → Rel ∩ 𝐴)
Theorem	relopabiv 5760*	A class of ordered pairs is a relation. For a version without a disjoint variable condition, but a longer proof using ax-11 2160 and ax-12 2180, see relopabi 5762. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jul-2023.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ Rel 𝐴
Theorem	relopabv 5761*	A class of ordered pairs is a relation. For a version without a disjoint variable condition, but using ax-11 2160 and ax-12 2180, see relopab 5764. (Contributed by SN, 8-Sep-2024.)
⊢ Rel {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	relopabi 5762	A class of ordered pairs is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Dec-2013.) Remove dependency on ax-sep 5234, ax-nul 5244, ax-pr 5370. (Revised by KP, 25-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ Rel 𝐴
Theorem	relopabiALT 5763	Alternate proof of relopabi 5762 (shorter but uses more axioms). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Dec-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ Rel 𝐴
Theorem	relopab 5764	A class of ordered pairs is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-1995.) Remove disjoint variable conditions. (Revised by Alan Sare, 9-Jul-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 21-Dec-2013.)
⊢ Rel {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	mptrel 5765	The maps-to notation always describes a binary relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Apr-2012.)
⊢ Rel (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)
Theorem	reli 5766	The identity relation is a relation. Part of Exercise 4.12(p) of [Mendelson] p. 235. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-Dec-2013.)
⊢ Rel I
Theorem	rele 5767	The membership relation is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 21-Dec-2013.)
⊢ Rel E
Theorem	opabid2 5768*	A relation expressed as an ordered pair abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 11-Dec-2006.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴)
Theorem	inopab 5769*	Intersection of two ordered pair class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2002.)
⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓}) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)}
Theorem	difopab 5770*	Difference of two ordered-pair class abstractions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.) (Proof shortened by SN, 19-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∖ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓}) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)}
Theorem	inxp 5771	Intersection of two Cartesian products. Exercise 9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Avoid ax-10 2144, ax-12 2180. (Revised by SN, 5-May-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ∩ (𝐶 × 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) × (𝐵 ∩ 𝐷))
Theorem	inxpOLD 5772	Obsolete version of inxp 5771 as of 5-May-2025. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ∩ (𝐶 × 𝐷)) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) × (𝐵 ∩ 𝐷))
Theorem	xpindi 5773	Distributive law for Cartesian product over intersection. Theorem 102 of [Suppes] p. 52. (Contributed by NM, 26-Sep-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 × (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐶))
Theorem	xpindir 5774	Distributive law for Cartesian product over intersection. Similar to Theorem 102 of [Suppes] p. 52. (Contributed by NM, 26-Sep-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) × 𝐶) = ((𝐴 × 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 × 𝐶))
Theorem	xpiindi 5775*	Distributive law for Cartesian product over indexed intersection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (𝐶 × ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) = ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵))
Theorem	xpriindi 5776*	Distributive law for Cartesian product over relativized indexed intersection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.)
⊢ (𝐶 × (𝐷 ∩ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵)) = ((𝐶 × 𝐷) ∩ ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 × 𝐵))
Theorem	eliunxp 5777*	Membership in a union of Cartesian products. Analogue of elxp 5639 for nonconstant 𝐵(𝑥). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐶 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)))
Theorem	opeliunxp2 5778*	Membership in a union of Cartesian products. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → 𝐵 = 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐸))
Theorem	raliunxp 5779*	Write a double restricted quantification as one universal quantifier. In this version of ralxp 5781, 𝐵(𝑦) is not assumed to be constant. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑦} × 𝐵)𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	rexiunxp 5780*	Write a double restricted quantification as one universal quantifier. In this version of rexxp 5782, 𝐵(𝑦) is not assumed to be constant. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑦} × 𝐵)𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	ralxp 5781*	Universal quantification restricted to a Cartesian product is equivalent to a double restricted quantification. The hypothesis specifies an implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	rexxp 5782*	Existential quantification restricted to a Cartesian product is equivalent to a double restricted quantification. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	exopxfr 5783*	Transfer ordered-pair existence from/to single variable existence. (Contributed by NM, 26-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ (V × V)𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧𝜓)
Theorem	exopxfr2 5784*	Transfer ordered-pair existence from/to single variable existence. (Contributed by NM, 26-Feb-2014.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)))
Theorem	djussxp 5785*	Disjoint union is a subset of a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐴 × V)
Theorem	ralxpf 5786*	Version of ralxp 5781 with bound-variable hypotheses. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	rexxpf 5787*	Version of rexxp 5782 with bound-variable hypotheses. (Contributed by NM, 19-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	iunxpf 5788*	Indexed union on a Cartesian product equals a double indexed union. The hypothesis specifies an implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 19-Dec-2008.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐶    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝐶    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐷    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)𝐶 = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∪ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝐷
Theorem	opabbi2dv 5789*	Deduce equality of a relation and an ordered-pair class abstraction. Compare eqabdv 2864. (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2014.)
⊢ Rel 𝐴    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓})
Theorem	relop 5790*	A necessary and sufficient condition for a Kuratowski ordered pair to be a relation. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2008.) A relation is a class of ordered pairs, so the fact that an ordered pair may sometimes be itself a relation is an "accident" depending on the specific encoding of ordered pairs as classes (in set.mm, the Kuratowski encoding). A more meaningful statement is relsnopg 5743, as funsng 6532 is to funop 7082. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (Rel ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐴 = {𝑥} ∧ 𝐵 = {𝑥, 𝑦}))
Theorem	ideqg 5791	For sets, the identity relation is the same as equality. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 I 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	ideq 5792	For sets, the identity relation is the same as equality. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 I 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	ididg 5793	A set is identical to itself. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-2008.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 I 𝐴)
Theorem	issetid 5794	Two ways of expressing set existence. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-2008.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ 𝐴 I 𝐴)
Theorem	coss1 5795	Subclass theorem for composition. (Contributed by FL, 30-Dec-2010.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 ∘ 𝐶))
Theorem	coss2 5796	Subclass theorem for composition. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ∘ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐶 ∘ 𝐵))
Theorem	coeq1 5797	Equality theorem for composition of two classes. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-1997.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∘ 𝐶))
Theorem	coeq2 5798	Equality theorem for composition of two classes. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-1997.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐶 ∘ 𝐴) = (𝐶 ∘ 𝐵))
Theorem	coeq1i 5799	Equality inference for composition of two classes. (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-2000.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∘ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∘ 𝐶)
Theorem	coeq2i 5800	Equality inference for composition of two classes. (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-2000.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∘ 𝐴) = (𝐶 ∘ 𝐵)