Theorem frss 5634

Description: Subset theorem for the well-founded predicate. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 31. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
frss	⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝑅 Fr 𝐵 → 𝑅 Fr 𝐴))

Proof of Theorem frss

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sstr2 3982	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵))
2	1	com12 32	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵))
3	2	anim1d 610	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅)))
4	3	imim1d 82	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦) → ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦)))
5	4	alimdv 1911	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦) → ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦)))
6		df-fr 5622	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 Fr 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦))
7		df-fr 5622	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦))
8	5, 6, 7	3imtr4g 296	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝑅 Fr 𝐵 → 𝑅 Fr 𝐴))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1531   ≠ wne 2932  ∀wral 3053  ∃wrex 3062   ⊆ wss 3941  ∅c0 4315   class class class wbr 5139   Fr wfr 5619

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1789  ax-4 1803  ax-5 1905  ax-6 1963  ax-7 2003  ax-8 2100  ax-9 2108  ax-ext 2695

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-tru 1536  df-ex 1774  df-sb 2060  df-clab 2702  df-cleq 2716  df-clel 2802  df-v 3468  df-in 3948  df-ss 3958  df-fr 5622

This theorem is referenced by:  freq2  5638  wess  5654  fprlem1  8281  frmin  9741  frrlem15  9749