Theorem frss 5642

Description: Subset theorem for the well-founded predicate. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 31. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
frss	⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝑅 Fr 𝐵 → 𝑅 Fr 𝐴))

Proof of Theorem frss

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sstr2 3988	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵))
2	1	com12 32	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵))
3	2	anim1d 611	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅)))
4	3	imim1d 82	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦) → ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦)))
5	4	alimdv 1919	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦) → ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦)))
6		df-fr 5630	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 Fr 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦))
7		df-fr 5630	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦))
8	5, 6, 7	3imtr4g 295	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝑅 Fr 𝐵 → 𝑅 Fr 𝐴))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 396  ∀wal 1539   ≠ wne 2940  ∀wral 3061  ∃wrex 3070   ⊆ wss 3947  ∅c0 4321   class class class wbr 5147   Fr wfr 5627

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-ext 2703

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-tru 1544  df-ex 1782  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2710  df-cleq 2724  df-clel 2810  df-v 3476  df-in 3954  df-ss 3964  df-fr 5630

This theorem is referenced by:  freq2  5646  wess  5662  fprlem1  8281  frmin  9740  frrlem15  9748