MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  frss Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem frss 5272
Description: Subset theorem for the well-founded predicate. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 31. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
frss (𝐴𝐵 → (𝑅 Fr 𝐵𝑅 Fr 𝐴))

Proof of Theorem frss
Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 sstr2 3799 . . . . . 6 (𝑥𝐴 → (𝐴𝐵𝑥𝐵))
21com12 32 . . . . 5 (𝐴𝐵 → (𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐵))
32anim1d 600 . . . 4 (𝐴𝐵 → ((𝑥𝐴𝑥 ≠ ∅) → (𝑥𝐵𝑥 ≠ ∅)))
43imim1d 82 . . 3 (𝐴𝐵 → (((𝑥𝐵𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦𝑥𝑧𝑥 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦) → ((𝑥𝐴𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦𝑥𝑧𝑥 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦)))
54alimdv 2007 . 2 (𝐴𝐵 → (∀𝑥((𝑥𝐵𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦𝑥𝑧𝑥 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦) → ∀𝑥((𝑥𝐴𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦𝑥𝑧𝑥 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦)))
6 df-fr 5264 . 2 (𝑅 Fr 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥𝐵𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦𝑥𝑧𝑥 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦))
7 df-fr 5264 . 2 (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥𝐴𝑥 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦𝑥𝑧𝑥 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦))
85, 6, 73imtr4g 287 1 (𝐴𝐵 → (𝑅 Fr 𝐵𝑅 Fr 𝐴))
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3  wi 4  wa 384  wal 1635  wne 2974  wral 3092  wrex 3093  wss 3763  c0 4110   class class class wbr 4837   Fr wfr 5261
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1877  ax-4 1894  ax-5 2001  ax-6 2067  ax-7 2103  ax-9 2164  ax-10 2184  ax-11 2200  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2781
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 198  df-an 385  df-or 866  df-tru 1641  df-ex 1860  df-nf 1864  df-sb 2060  df-clab 2789  df-cleq 2795  df-clel 2798  df-in 3770  df-ss 3777  df-fr 5264
This theorem is referenced by:  freq2  5276  wess  5292  frmin  32057  frrlem5  32099
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator