Theorem frc 5641

Description: Property of well-founded relation (one direction of definition using class variables). (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Nov-2014.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
frc.1	⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
frc	⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝑦𝑅𝑥} = ∅)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦

Proof of Theorem frc

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		frc.1	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V
2		fri 5635	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ V ∧ 𝑅 Fr 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥)
3	1, 2	mpanl1 698	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥)
4	3	3impb 1115	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥)
5		breq1 5150	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝑦𝑅𝑥 ↔ 𝑧𝑅𝑥))
6	5	rabeq0w 4382	. . 3 ⊢ ({𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝑦𝑅𝑥} = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥)
7	6	rexbii 3094	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝑦𝑅𝑥} = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥)
8	4, 7	sylibr 233	1 ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝑦𝑅𝑥} = ∅)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 396   ∧ w3a 1087   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2106   ≠ wne 2940  ∀wral 3061  ∃wrex 3070  {crab 3432  Vcvv 3474   ⊆ wss 3947  ∅c0 4321   class class class wbr 5147   Fr wfr 5627

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-ext 2703

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 846  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1782  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2710  df-cleq 2724  df-clel 2810  df-ne 2941  df-ral 3062  df-rex 3071  df-rab 3433  df-v 3476  df-dif 3950  df-un 3952  df-in 3954  df-ss 3964  df-nul 4322  df-if 4528  df-pw 4603  df-sn 4628  df-pr 4630  df-op 4634  df-br 5148  df-fr 5630

This theorem is referenced by:  frirr  5652  epfrc  5661