Theorem frc 5618

Description: Property of well-founded relation (one direction of definition using class variables). (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Nov-2014.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
frc.1	⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
frc	⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝑦𝑅𝑥} = ∅)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦

Proof of Theorem frc

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		frc.1	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V
2		fri 5613	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ V ∧ 𝑅 Fr 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥)
3	1, 2	mpanl1 713	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥)
4	3	3impb 1132	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥)
5		breq1 5106	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝑦𝑅𝑥 ↔ 𝑧𝑅𝑥))
6	5	rabeq0w 4337	. . 3 ⊢ ({𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝑦𝑅𝑥} = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥)
7	6	rexbii 3109	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝑦𝑅𝑥} = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥)
8	4, 7	sylibr 237	1 ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 {𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝑦𝑅𝑥} = ∅)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145   ≠ wne 2955  ∀wral 3076  ∃wrex 3086  {crab 3412  Vcvv 3450   ⊆ wss 3899  ∅c0 4279   class class class wbr 5103   Fr wfr 5605

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-ext 2732

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-br 5104  df-fr 5608

This theorem is used by:  frirr  5631  epfrc  5640