Theorem inintabss 44578

Description: Upper bound on intersection of class and the intersection of a class. (Contributed by RP, 13-Aug-2020.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
inintabss	⊢ (𝐴 ∩ ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) ⊆ ∩ {𝑤 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑤 = (𝐴 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝜑)}

Distinct variable groups:   𝜑,𝑤   𝑥,𝑤,𝐴

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem inintabss

Dummy variable 𝑢 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ax-1 6	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 → (∃𝑥𝜑 → 𝑢 ∈ 𝐴))
2	1	anim1i 627	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑢 ∈ 𝑥)) → ((∃𝑥𝜑 → 𝑢 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑢 ∈ 𝑥)))
3		elinintab 44575	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) ↔ (𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑢 ∈ 𝑥)))
4		elinintrab 44577	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑢 ∈ V → (𝑢 ∈ ∩ {𝑤 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑤 = (𝐴 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ ((∃𝑥𝜑 → 𝑢 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑢 ∈ 𝑥))))
5	4	elv 3456	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑢 ∈ ∩ {𝑤 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑤 = (𝐴 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ ((∃𝑥𝜑 → 𝑢 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑢 ∈ 𝑥)))
6	2, 3, 5	3imtr4i 295	. 2 ⊢ (𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) → 𝑢 ∈ ∩ {𝑤 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑤 = (𝐴 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝜑)})
7	6	ssriv 3935	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) ⊆ ∩ {𝑤 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑤 = (𝐴 ∩ 𝑥) ∧ 𝜑)}

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401  ∀wal 1568   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2145  {cab 2739  {crab 3413  Vcvv 3451   ∩ cin 3898   ⊆ wss 3899  𝒫 cpw 4557  ∩ cint 4907

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2733  ax-sep 5249

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-tru 1573  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-pw 4559  df-int 4908

This theorem is used by: (None)