Theorem iscmgmALT 48712

Description: The predicate "is a commutative magma". (Contributed by AV, 20-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ismgmALT.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)
ismgmALT.o	⊢ ⚬ = (+g‘𝑀)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
iscmgmALT	⊢ (𝑀 ∈ CMgmALT ↔ (𝑀 ∈ MgmALT ∧ ⚬ comLaw 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem iscmgmALT

Dummy variable 𝑚 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fveq2 6834	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → (+g‘𝑚) = (+g‘𝑀))
2		fveq2 6834	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → (Base‘𝑚) = (Base‘𝑀))
3	1, 2	breq12d 5099	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → ((+g‘𝑚) comLaw (Base‘𝑚) ↔ (+g‘𝑀) comLaw (Base‘𝑀)))
4		ismgmALT.o	. . . 4 ⊢ ⚬ = (+g‘𝑀)
5		ismgmALT.b	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)
6	4, 5	breq12i 5095	. . 3 ⊢ ( ⚬ comLaw 𝐵 ↔ (+g‘𝑀) comLaw (Base‘𝑀))
7	3, 6	bitr4di 289	. 2 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → ((+g‘𝑚) comLaw (Base‘𝑚) ↔ ⚬ comLaw 𝐵))
8		df-cmgm2 48708	. 2 ⊢ CMgmALT = {𝑚 ∈ MgmALT ∣ (+g‘𝑚) comLaw (Base‘𝑚)}
9	7, 8	elrab2 3638	1 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ CMgmALT ↔ (𝑀 ∈ MgmALT ∧ ⚬ comLaw 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2114   class class class wbr 5086  ‘cfv 6492  Basecbs 17170  +_gcplusg 17211   comLaw ccomlaw 48673  MgmALTcmgm2 48703  CMgmALTccmgm2 48704

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-ext 2709

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2812  df-rab 3391  df-v 3432  df-dif 3893  df-un 3895  df-ss 3907  df-nul 4275  df-if 4468  df-sn 4569  df-pr 4571  df-op 4575  df-uni 4852  df-br 5087  df-iota 6448  df-fv 6500  df-cmgm2 48708

This theorem is referenced by: (None)