Mathbox for Alexander van der Vekens |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > Mathboxes > iscmgmALT | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: The predicate "is a commutative magma". (Contributed by AV, 20-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ismgmALT.b | ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) |
ismgmALT.o | ⊢ ⚬ = (+g‘𝑀) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
iscmgmALT | ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ CMgmALT ↔ (𝑀 ∈ MgmALT ∧ ⚬ comLaw 𝐵)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | fveq2 6768 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → (+g‘𝑚) = (+g‘𝑀)) | |
2 | fveq2 6768 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → (Base‘𝑚) = (Base‘𝑀)) | |
3 | 1, 2 | breq12d 5091 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → ((+g‘𝑚) comLaw (Base‘𝑚) ↔ (+g‘𝑀) comLaw (Base‘𝑀))) |
4 | ismgmALT.o | . . . 4 ⊢ ⚬ = (+g‘𝑀) | |
5 | ismgmALT.b | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) | |
6 | 4, 5 | breq12i 5087 | . . 3 ⊢ ( ⚬ comLaw 𝐵 ↔ (+g‘𝑀) comLaw (Base‘𝑀)) |
7 | 3, 6 | bitr4di 288 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → ((+g‘𝑚) comLaw (Base‘𝑚) ↔ ⚬ comLaw 𝐵)) |
8 | df-cmgm2 45366 | . 2 ⊢ CMgmALT = {𝑚 ∈ MgmALT ∣ (+g‘𝑚) comLaw (Base‘𝑚)} | |
9 | 7, 8 | elrab2 3628 | 1 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ CMgmALT ↔ (𝑀 ∈ MgmALT ∧ ⚬ comLaw 𝐵)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ↔ wb 205 ∧ wa 395 = wceq 1541 ∈ wcel 2109 class class class wbr 5078 ‘cfv 6430 Basecbs 16893 +gcplusg 16943 comLaw ccomlaw 45331 MgmALTcmgm2 45361 CMgmALTccmgm2 45362 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1801 ax-4 1815 ax-5 1916 ax-6 1974 ax-7 2014 ax-8 2111 ax-9 2119 ax-ext 2710 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 396 df-or 844 df-3an 1087 df-tru 1544 df-fal 1554 df-ex 1786 df-sb 2071 df-clab 2717 df-cleq 2731 df-clel 2817 df-rab 3074 df-v 3432 df-dif 3894 df-un 3896 df-in 3898 df-ss 3908 df-nul 4262 df-if 4465 df-sn 4567 df-pr 4569 df-op 4573 df-uni 4845 df-br 5079 df-iota 6388 df-fv 6438 df-cmgm2 45366 |
This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |