Mathbox for Alexander van der Vekens |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > Mathboxes > iscmgmALT | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: The predicate "is a commutative magma". (Contributed by AV, 20-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ismgmALT.b | ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) |
ismgmALT.o | ⊢ ⚬ = (+g‘𝑀) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
iscmgmALT | ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ CMgmALT ↔ (𝑀 ∈ MgmALT ∧ ⚬ comLaw 𝐵)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | fveq2 6804 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → (+g‘𝑚) = (+g‘𝑀)) | |
2 | fveq2 6804 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → (Base‘𝑚) = (Base‘𝑀)) | |
3 | 1, 2 | breq12d 5094 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → ((+g‘𝑚) comLaw (Base‘𝑚) ↔ (+g‘𝑀) comLaw (Base‘𝑀))) |
4 | ismgmALT.o | . . . 4 ⊢ ⚬ = (+g‘𝑀) | |
5 | ismgmALT.b | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀) | |
6 | 4, 5 | breq12i 5090 | . . 3 ⊢ ( ⚬ comLaw 𝐵 ↔ (+g‘𝑀) comLaw (Base‘𝑀)) |
7 | 3, 6 | bitr4di 289 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → ((+g‘𝑚) comLaw (Base‘𝑚) ↔ ⚬ comLaw 𝐵)) |
8 | df-cmgm2 45658 | . 2 ⊢ CMgmALT = {𝑚 ∈ MgmALT ∣ (+g‘𝑚) comLaw (Base‘𝑚)} | |
9 | 7, 8 | elrab2 3632 | 1 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ CMgmALT ↔ (𝑀 ∈ MgmALT ∧ ⚬ comLaw 𝐵)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ↔ wb 205 ∧ wa 397 = wceq 1539 ∈ wcel 2104 class class class wbr 5081 ‘cfv 6458 Basecbs 16961 +gcplusg 17011 comLaw ccomlaw 45623 MgmALTcmgm2 45653 CMgmALTccmgm2 45654 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1795 ax-4 1809 ax-5 1911 ax-6 1969 ax-7 2009 ax-8 2106 ax-9 2114 ax-ext 2707 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 398 df-or 846 df-3an 1089 df-tru 1542 df-fal 1552 df-ex 1780 df-sb 2066 df-clab 2714 df-cleq 2728 df-clel 2814 df-rab 3306 df-v 3439 df-dif 3895 df-un 3897 df-in 3899 df-ss 3909 df-nul 4263 df-if 4466 df-sn 4566 df-pr 4568 df-op 4572 df-uni 4845 df-br 5082 df-iota 6410 df-fv 6466 df-cmgm2 45658 |
This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |