Theorem iscmgmALT 42725

Description: The predicate "is a commutative magma." (Contributed by AV, 20-Jan-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ismgmALT.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)
ismgmALT.o	⊢ ⚬ = (+g‘𝑀)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
iscmgmALT	⊢ (𝑀 ∈ CMgmALT ↔ (𝑀 ∈ MgmALT ∧ ⚬ comLaw 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem iscmgmALT

Dummy variable 𝑚 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fveq2 6437	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → (+g‘𝑚) = (+g‘𝑀))
2		fveq2 6437	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → (Base‘𝑚) = (Base‘𝑀))
3	1, 2	breq12d 4888	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → ((+g‘𝑚) comLaw (Base‘𝑚) ↔ (+g‘𝑀) comLaw (Base‘𝑀)))
4		ismgmALT.o	. . . 4 ⊢ ⚬ = (+g‘𝑀)
5		ismgmALT.b	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)
6	4, 5	breq12i 4884	. . 3 ⊢ ( ⚬ comLaw 𝐵 ↔ (+g‘𝑀) comLaw (Base‘𝑀))
7	3, 6	syl6bbr 281	. 2 ⊢ (𝑚 = 𝑀 → ((+g‘𝑚) comLaw (Base‘𝑚) ↔ ⚬ comLaw 𝐵))
8		df-cmgm2 42721	. 2 ⊢ CMgmALT = {𝑚 ∈ MgmALT ∣ (+g‘𝑚) comLaw (Base‘𝑚)}
9	7, 8	elrab2 3589	1 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ CMgmALT ↔ (𝑀 ∈ MgmALT ∧ ⚬ comLaw 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 198   ∧ wa 386   = wceq 1656   ∈ wcel 2164   class class class wbr 4875  ‘cfv 6127  Basecbs 16229  +_gcplusg 16312   comLaw ccomlaw 42686  MgmALTcmgm2 42716  CMgmALTccmgm2 42717

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1894  ax-4 1908  ax-5 2009  ax-6 2075  ax-7 2112  ax-9 2173  ax-10 2192  ax-11 2207  ax-12 2220  ax-13 2389  ax-ext 2803

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 199  df-an 387  df-or 879  df-3an 1113  df-tru 1660  df-ex 1879  df-nf 1883  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2812  df-cleq 2818  df-clel 2821  df-nfc 2958  df-rex 3123  df-rab 3126  df-v 3416  df-dif 3801  df-un 3803  df-in 3805  df-ss 3812  df-nul 4147  df-if 4309  df-sn 4400  df-pr 4402  df-op 4406  df-uni 4661  df-br 4876  df-iota 6090  df-fv 6135  df-cmgm2 42721

This theorem is referenced by: (None)