P. 471 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 47001-47100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	dfaiota2 47001*	Alternate definition of the alternate version of Russell's definition of a description binder. Definition 8.18 in [Quine] p. 56. (Contributed by AV, 24-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (℩'𝑥𝜑) = ∩ {𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)}
Theorem	reuabaiotaiota 47002*	The iota and the alternate iota over a wff 𝜑 are equal iff there is a unique satisfying value of {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦}. (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (∃!𝑦{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦} ↔ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩'𝑥𝜑))
Theorem	reuaiotaiota 47003	The iota and the alternate iota over a wff 𝜑 are equal iff there is a unique value 𝑥 satisfying 𝜑. (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩'𝑥𝜑))
Theorem	aiotaexb 47004	The alternate iota over a wff 𝜑 is a set iff there is a unique value 𝑥 satisfying 𝜑. (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ (℩'𝑥𝜑) ∈ V)
Theorem	aiotavb 47005	The alternate iota over a wff 𝜑 is the universe iff there is no unique value 𝑥 satisfying 𝜑. (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (¬ ∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ (℩'𝑥𝜑) = V)
Theorem	aiotaint 47006	This is to df-aiota 47000 what iotauni 6548 is to df-iota 6525 (it uses intersection like df-aiota 47000, similar to iotauni 6548 using union like df-iota 6525; we could also prove an analogous result using union here too, in the same way that we have iotaint 6549). (Contributed by BJ, 31-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩'𝑥𝜑) = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
Theorem	dfaiota3 47007	Alternate definition of ℩': this is to df-aiota 47000 what dfiota4 6565 is to df-iota 6525. operation using the if operator. It is simpler than df-aiota 47000 and uses no dummy variables, so it would be the preferred definition if ℩' becomes the description binder used in set.mm. (Contributed by BJ, 31-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (℩'𝑥𝜑) = if(∃!𝑥𝜑, ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}, V)
Theorem	iotan0aiotaex 47008	If the iota over a wff 𝜑 is not empty, the alternate iota over 𝜑 is a set. (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2022.)
⊢ ((℩𝑥𝜑) ≠ ∅ → (℩'𝑥𝜑) ∈ V)
Theorem	aiotaexaiotaiota 47009	The alternate iota over a wff 𝜑 is a set iff the iota and the alternate iota over 𝜑 are equal. (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2022.)
⊢ ((℩'𝑥𝜑) ∈ V ↔ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩'𝑥𝜑))
Theorem	aiotaval 47010*	Theorem 8.19 in [Quine] p. 57. This theorem is the fundamental property of (alternate) iota. (Contributed by AV, 24-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (℩'𝑥𝜑) = 𝑦)
Theorem	aiota0def 47011*	Example for a defined alternate iota being the empty set, i.e., ∀𝑦𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 is a wff satisfied by a unique value 𝑥, namely 𝑥 = ∅ (the empty set is the one and only set which is a subset of every set). This corresponds to iota0def 46953. (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (℩'𝑥∀𝑦 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦) = ∅
Theorem	aiota0ndef 47012*	Example for an undefined alternate iota being no set, i.e., ∀𝑦𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 is a wff not satisfied by a (unique) value 𝑥 (there is no set, and therefore certainly no unique set, which contains every set). This is different from iota0ndef 46954, where the iota still is a set (the empty set). (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (℩'𝑥∀𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ∉ V
21.48.3  Double restricted existential uniqueness
21.48.3.1  Restricted quantification (extension)
Theorem	r19.32 47013	Theorem 19.32 of [Margaris] p. 90 with restricted quantifiers, analogous to r19.32v 3198. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 29-Jun-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	rexsb 47014*	An equivalent expression for restricted existence, analogous to exsb 2365. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))
Theorem	rexrsb 47015*	An equivalent expression for restricted existence, analogous to exsb 2365. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))
Theorem	2rexsb 47016*	An equivalent expression for double restricted existence, analogous to rexsb 47014. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝜑))
Theorem	2rexrsb 47017*	An equivalent expression for double restricted existence, analogous to 2exsb 2366. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝜑))
Theorem	cbvral2 47018*	Change bound variables of double restricted universal quantification, using implicit substitution, analogous to cbvral2v 3376. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Jul-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝜒    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	cbvrex2 47019*	Change bound variables of double restricted universal quantification, using implicit substitution, analogous to cbvrex2v 3377. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Jul-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝜒    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	ralndv1 47020	Example for a theorem about a restricted universal quantification in which the restricting class depends on (actually is) the bound variable: All sets containing themselves contain the universal class. (Contributed by AV, 24-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑥 V ∈ 𝑥
Theorem	ralndv2 47021	Second example for a theorem about a restricted universal quantification in which the restricting class depends on the bound variable: all subsets of a set are sets. (Contributed by AV, 24-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑥𝑥 ∈ V
21.48.3.2  Restricted uniqueness and "at most one" quantification
Theorem	reuf1odnf 47022*	There is exactly one element in each of two isomorphic sets. Variant of reuf1od 47023 with no distinct variable condition for 𝜒. (Contributed by AV, 19-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐶–1-1-onto→𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = (𝐹‘𝑦)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝜒))
Theorem	reuf1od 47023*	There is exactly one element in each of two isomorphic sets. (Contributed by AV, 19-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐶–1-1-onto→𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = (𝐹‘𝑦)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝜒))
Theorem	euoreqb 47024*	There is a set which is equal to one of two other sets iff the other sets are equal. (Contributed by AV, 24-Jan-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
21.48.3.3  Analogs to Existential uniqueness (double quantification)
Theorem	2reu3 47025*	Double restricted existential uniqueness, analogous to 2eu3 2657. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 29-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∨ ∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) → ((∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) ↔ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)))
Theorem	2reu7 47026*	Two equivalent expressions for double restricted existential uniqueness, analogous to 2eu7 2661. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Jul-2017.)
⊢ ((∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
Theorem	2reu8 47027*	Two equivalent expressions for double restricted existential uniqueness, analogous to 2eu8 2662. Curiously, we can put ∃! on either of the internal conjuncts but not both. We can also commute ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 using 2reu7 47026. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
21.48.3.4  Additional theorems for double restricted existential uniqueness
Theorem	2reu8i 47028*	Implication of a double restricted existential uniqueness in terms of restricted existential quantification and restricted universal quantification, see also 2reu8 47027. The involved wffs depend on the setvar variables as follows: ph(x,y), ta(v,y), ch(x,w), th(v,w), et(x,b), ps(a,b), ze(a,w). (Contributed by AV, 1-Apr-2023.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑣 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑣 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑏 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑎 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜁))    &   ⊢ (((𝜒 → 𝑦 = 𝑤) ∧ 𝜁) → 𝑦 = 𝑤)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑎 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑏) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜂 → (𝑏 = 𝑦 ∧ (𝜓 → 𝑎 = 𝑥)))))
Theorem	2reuimp0 47029*	Implication of a double restricted existential uniqueness in terms of restricted existential quantification and restricted universal quantification. The involved wffs depend on the setvar variables as follows: ph(a,b), th(a,c), ch(d,b), ta(d,c), et(a,e), ps(a,f) (Contributed by AV, 13-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑐 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑓 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 𝜑 → ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑑 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝑉 ((𝜂 ∧ ((𝜒 ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑉 (𝜏 → 𝑏 = 𝑐)) → 𝑎 = 𝑑)) ∧ (𝜓 → 𝑒 = 𝑓)))
Theorem	2reuimp 47030*	Implication of a double restricted existential uniqueness in terms of restricted existential quantification and restricted universal quantification if the class of the quantified elements is not empty. (Contributed by AV, 13-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑐 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑓 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑉 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃!𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 𝜑) → ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑑 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑉 ((𝜒 ∧ (𝜏 → 𝑏 = 𝑐)) → (𝜓 → (𝜂 ∧ (𝑎 = 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 = 𝑓)))))
21.48.4  Alternative definitions of function and operation values The current definition of the value (𝐹‘𝐴) of a function 𝐹 at an argument 𝐴 (see df-fv 6581) assures that this value is always a set, see fex 7263. This is because this definition can be applied to any classes 𝐹 and 𝐴, and evaluates to the empty set when it is not meaningful (as shown by ndmfv 6955 and fvprc 6912). Although it is very convenient for many theorems on functions and their proofs, there are some cases in which from (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅ alone it cannot be decided/derived whether (𝐹‘𝐴) is meaningful (𝐹 is actually a function which is defined for 𝐴 and really has the function value ∅ at 𝐴) or not. Therefore, additional assumptions are required, such as ∅ ∉ ran 𝐹, ∅ ∈ ran 𝐹 or Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 (see, for example, ndmfvrcl 6956). To avoid such an ambiguity, an alternative definition (𝐹'''𝐴) (see df-afv 47035) would be possible which evaluates to the universal class ((𝐹'''𝐴) = V) if it is not meaningful (see afvnfundmuv 47054, ndmafv 47055, afvprc 47059 and nfunsnafv 47057), and which corresponds to the current definition ((𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐹'''𝐴)) if it is (see afvfundmfveq 47053). That means (𝐹'''𝐴) = V → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅ (see afvpcfv0 47061), but (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅ → (𝐹'''𝐴) = V is not generally valid. In the theory of partial functions, it is a common case that 𝐹 is not defined at 𝐴, which also would result in (𝐹'''𝐴) = V. In this context we say (𝐹'''𝐴) "is not defined" instead of "is not meaningful". With this definition the following intuitive equivalence holds: (𝐹'''𝐴) ∈ V <-> "(𝐹'''𝐴) is meaningful/defined". An interesting question would be if (𝐹‘𝐴) could be replaced by (𝐹'''𝐴) in most of the theorems based on function values. If we look at the (currently 19) proofs using the definition df-fv 6581 of (𝐹‘𝐴), we see that analogues for the following 8 theorems can be proven using the alternative definition: fveq1 6919-> afveq1 47049, fveq2 6920-> afveq2 47050, nffv 6930-> nfafv 47051, csbfv12 6968-> csbafv12g , fvres 6939-> afvres 47087, rlimdm 15597-> rlimdmafv 47092, tz6.12-1 6943-> tz6.12-1-afv 47089, fveu 6909-> afveu 47068. Three theorems proved by directly using df-fv 6581 are within a mathbox (fvsb 44421) or not used (isumclim3 15807, avril1 30495). However, the remaining 8 theorems proved by directly using df-fv 6581 are used more or less often: * fvex 6933: used in about 1750 proofs. * tz6.12-1 6943: root theorem of many theorems which have not a strict analogue, and which are used many times: fvprc 6912 (used in about 127 proofs), tz6.12i 6948 (used - indirectly via fvbr0 6949 and fvrn0 6950- in 18 proofs, and in fvclss 7278 used in fvclex 7999 used in fvresex 8000, which is not used!), dcomex 10516 (used in 4 proofs), ndmfv 6955 (used in 86 proofs) and nfunsn 6962 (used by dffv2 7017 which is not used). * fv2 6915: only used by elfv 6918, which is only used by fv3 6938, which is not used. * dffv3 6916: used by dffv4 6917 (the previous "df-fv"), which now is only used in deprecated (usage discouraged) theorems or within mathboxes (csbfv12gALTVD 44870), by shftval 15123 (itself used in 9 proofs), by dffv5 35888 (mathbox) and by fvco2 7019, which has the analogue afvco2 47091. * fvopab5 7062: used only by ajval 30893 (not used) and by adjval 31922 (used - indirectly - in 9 proofs). * zsum 15766: used (via isum 15767, sum0 15769 and fsumsers 15776) in more than 90 proofs. * isumshft 15887: used in pserdv2 26492 and (via logtayl 26720) 4 other proofs. * ovtpos 8282: used in 14 proofs. As a result of this analysis we can say that the current definition of a function value is crucial for Metamath and cannot be exchanged easily with an alternative definition. While fv2 6915, dffv3 6916, fvopab5 7062, zsum 15766, isumshft 15887 and ovtpos 8282 are not critical or are, hopefully, also valid for the alternative definition, fvex 6933 and tz6.12-1 6943 (and the theorems based on them) are essential for the current definition of function values. With the same arguments, an alternative definition of operation values ((𝐴𝑂𝐵)) could be meaningful to avoid ambiguities, see df-aov 47036. For additional details, see https://groups.google.com/g/metamath/c/cteNUppB6A4 47036.
Syntax	wdfat 47031	Extend the definition of a wff to include the "defined at" predicate. Read: "(the function) 𝐹 is defined at (the argument) 𝐴". In a previous version, the token "def@" was used. However, since the @ is used (informally) as a replacement for $ in commented out sections that may be deleted some day. While there is no violation of any standard to use the @ in a token, it could make the search for such commented-out sections slightly more difficult. (See remark of Norman Megill at https://groups.google.com/g/metamath/c/cteNUppB6A4).
wff 𝐹 defAt 𝐴
Syntax	cafv 47032	Extend the definition of a class to include the value of a function. Read: "the value of 𝐹 at 𝐴 " or "𝐹 of 𝐴". In a previous version, the symbol " ' " was used. However, since the similarity with the symbol ‘ used for the current definition of a function's value (see df-fv 6581), which, by the way, was intended to visualize that in many cases ‘ and " ' " are exchangeable, makes reading the theorems, especially those which use both definitions as dfafv2 47047, very difficult, 3 apostrophes ''' are used now so that it's easier to distinguish from df-fv 6581 and df-ima 5713. And not three backticks ( three times ‘) since that would be annoying to escape in a comment. (See remark of Norman Megill and Gerard Lang at https://groups.google.com/g/metamath/c/cteNUppB6A4 5713).
class (𝐹'''𝐴)
Syntax	caov 47033	Extend class notation to include the value of an operation 𝐹 (such as +) for two arguments 𝐴 and 𝐵. Note that the syntax is simply three class symbols in a row surrounded by a pair of parentheses in contrast to the current definition, see df-ov 7451.
class ((𝐴𝐹𝐵))
Definition	df-dfat 47034	Definition of the predicate that determines if some class 𝐹 is defined as function for an argument 𝐴 or, in other words, if the function value for some class 𝐹 for an argument 𝐴 is defined. We say that 𝐹 is defined at 𝐴 if a 𝐹 is a function restricted to the member 𝐴 of its domain. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝐹 defAt 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ Fun (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴})))
Definition	df-afv 47035*	Alternative definition of the value of a function, (𝐹'''𝐴), also known as function application. In contrast to (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅ (see df-fv 6581 and ndmfv 6955), (𝐹'''𝐴) = V if F is not defined for A! (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.) (Revised by BJ/AV, 25-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (𝐹'''𝐴) = (℩'𝑥𝐴𝐹𝑥)
Definition	df-aov 47036	Define the value of an operation. In contrast to df-ov 7451, the alternative definition for a function value (see df-afv 47035) is used. By this, the value of the operation applied to two arguments is the universal class if the operation is not defined for these two arguments. There are still no restrictions of any kind on what those class expressions may be, although only certain kinds of class expressions - a binary operation 𝐹 and its arguments 𝐴 and 𝐵- will be useful for proving meaningful theorems. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) = (𝐹'''⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)
21.48.4.1  Restricted quantification (extension)
Theorem	ralbinrald 47037*	Elemination of a restricted universal quantification under certain conditions. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Aug-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 = 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))
21.48.4.2  The universal class (extension)
Theorem	nvelim 47038	If a class is the universal class it doesn't belong to any class, generalization of nvel 5334. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 = V → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
21.48.4.3  Introduce the Axiom of Power Sets (extension)
Theorem	alneu 47039	If a statement holds for all sets, there is not a unique set for which the statement holds. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 28-Nov-2017.)
⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → ¬ ∃!𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	eu2ndop1stv 47040*	If there is a unique second component in an ordered pair contained in a given set, the first component must be a set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 29-Nov-2017.)
⊢ (∃!𝑦⟨𝐴, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
21.48.4.4  Predicate "defined at"
Theorem	dfateq12d 47041	Equality deduction for "defined at". (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 defAt 𝐴 ↔ 𝐺 defAt 𝐵))
Theorem	nfdfat 47042	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for "defined at". To prove a deduction version of this theorem is not easily possible because many deduction versions for bound-variable hypothesis builder for constructs the definition of "defined at" is based on are not available (e.g., for Fun/Rel, dom, ⊆, etc.). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐹 defAt 𝐴
Theorem	dfdfat2 47043*	Alternate definition of the predicate "defined at" not using the Fun predicate. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jul-2017.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.)
⊢ (𝐹 defAt 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ ∃!𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑦))
Theorem	fundmdfat 47044	A function is defined at any element of its domain. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2022.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → 𝐹 defAt 𝐴)
Theorem	dfatprc 47045	A function is not defined at a proper class. (Contributed by AV, 1-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ¬ 𝐹 defAt 𝐴)
Theorem	dfatelrn 47046	The value of a function 𝐹 at a set 𝐴 is in the range of the function 𝐹 if 𝐹 is defined at 𝐴. (Contributed by AV, 1-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (𝐹 defAt 𝐴 → (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ ran 𝐹)
21.48.4.5  Alternative definition of the value of a function
Theorem	dfafv2 47047	Alternative definition of (𝐹'''𝐴) using (𝐹‘𝐴) directly. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jul-2017.) (Revised by AV, 25-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (𝐹'''𝐴) = if(𝐹 defAt 𝐴, (𝐹‘𝐴), V)
Theorem	afveq12d 47048	Equality deduction for function value, analogous to fveq12d 6927. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹'''𝐴) = (𝐺'''𝐵))
Theorem	afveq1 47049	Equality theorem for function value, analogous to fveq1 6919. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐹 = 𝐺 → (𝐹'''𝐴) = (𝐺'''𝐴))
Theorem	afveq2 47050	Equality theorem for function value, analogous to fveq1 6919. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐹'''𝐴) = (𝐹'''𝐵))
Theorem	nfafv 47051	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for function value, analogous to nffv 6930. To prove a deduction version of this analogous to nffvd 6932 is not easily possible because a deduction version of nfdfat 47042 cannot be shown easily. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹'''𝐴)
Theorem	csbafv12g 47052	Move class substitution in and out of a function value, analogous to csbfv12 6968, with a direct proof proposed by Mario Carneiro, analogous to csbov123 7492. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹'''𝐵) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹'''⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵))
Theorem	afvfundmfveq 47053	If a class is a function restricted to a member of its domain, then the function value for this member is equal for both definitions. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝐹 defAt 𝐴 → (𝐹'''𝐴) = (𝐹‘𝐴))
Theorem	afvnfundmuv 47054	If a set is not in the domain of a class or the class is not a function restricted to the set, then the function value for this set is the universe. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐹 defAt 𝐴 → (𝐹'''𝐴) = V)
Theorem	ndmafv 47055	The value of a class outside its domain is the universe, compare with ndmfv 6955. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 → (𝐹'''𝐴) = V)
Theorem	afvvdm 47056	If the function value of a class for an argument is a set, the argument is contained in the domain of the class. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹'''𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹)
Theorem	nfunsnafv 47057	If the restriction of a class to a singleton is not a function, its value is the universe, compare with nfunsn 6962. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (¬ Fun (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴}) → (𝐹'''𝐴) = V)
Theorem	afvvfunressn 47058	If the function value of a class for an argument is a set, the class restricted to the singleton of the argument is a function. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹'''𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 → Fun (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴}))
Theorem	afvprc 47059	A function's value at a proper class is the universe, compare with fvprc 6912. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → (𝐹'''𝐴) = V)
Theorem	afvvv 47060	If a function's value at an argument is a set, the argument is also a set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹'''𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	afvpcfv0 47061	If the value of the alternative function at an argument is the universe, the function's value at this argument is the empty set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹'''𝐴) = V → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅)
Theorem	afvnufveq 47062	The value of the alternative function at a set as argument equals the function's value at this argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹'''𝐴) ≠ V → (𝐹'''𝐴) = (𝐹‘𝐴))
Theorem	afvvfveq 47063	The value of the alternative function at a set as argument equals the function's value at this argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹'''𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐹'''𝐴) = (𝐹‘𝐴))
Theorem	afv0fv0 47064	If the value of the alternative function at an argument is the empty set, the function's value at this argument is the empty set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹'''𝐴) = ∅ → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅)
Theorem	afvfvn0fveq 47065	If the function's value at an argument is not the empty set, it equals the value of the alternative function at this argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹‘𝐴) ≠ ∅ → (𝐹'''𝐴) = (𝐹‘𝐴))
Theorem	afv0nbfvbi 47066	The function's value at an argument is an element of a set if and only if the value of the alternative function at this argument is an element of that set, if the set does not contain the empty set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (∅ ∉ 𝐵 → ((𝐹'''𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	afvfv0bi 47067	The function's value at an argument is the empty set if and only if the value of the alternative function at this argument is either the empty set or the universe. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅ ↔ ((𝐹'''𝐴) = ∅ ∨ (𝐹'''𝐴) = V))
Theorem	afveu 47068*	The value of a function at a unique point, analogous to fveu 6909. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 29-Nov-2017.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 𝐴𝐹𝑥 → (𝐹'''𝐴) = ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑥})
Theorem	fnbrafvb 47069	Equivalence of function value and binary relation, analogous to fnbrfvb 6973. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐹'''𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵𝐹𝐶))
Theorem	fnopafvb 47070	Equivalence of function value and ordered pair membership, analogous to fnopfvb 6974. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐹'''𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝐹))
Theorem	funbrafvb 47071	Equivalence of function value and binary relation, analogous to funbrfvb 6975. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → ((𝐹'''𝐴) = 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴𝐹𝐵))
Theorem	funopafvb 47072	Equivalence of function value and ordered pair membership, analogous to funopfvb 6976. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → ((𝐹'''𝐴) = 𝐵 ↔ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝐹))
Theorem	funbrafv 47073	The second argument of a binary relation on a function is the function's value, analogous to funbrfv 6971. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (𝐴𝐹𝐵 → (𝐹'''𝐴) = 𝐵))
Theorem	funbrafv2b 47074	Function value in terms of a binary relation, analogous to funbrfv2b 6979. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (𝐴𝐹𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹'''𝐴) = 𝐵)))
Theorem	dfafn5a 47075*	Representation of a function in terms of its values, analogous to dffn5 6980 (only one direction of implication!). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐹'''𝑥)))
Theorem	dfafn5b 47076*	Representation of a function in terms of its values, analogous to dffn5 6980 (only if it is assumed that the function value for each x is a set). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹'''𝑥) ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ↔ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐹'''𝑥))))
Theorem	fnrnafv 47077*	The range of a function expressed as a collection of the function's values, analogous to fnrnfv 6981. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → ran 𝐹 = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = (𝐹'''𝑥)})
Theorem	afvelrnb 47078*	A member of a function's range is a value of the function, analogous to fvelrnb 6982 with the additional requirement that the member must be a set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹'''𝑥) = 𝐵))
Theorem	afvelrnb0 47079*	A member of a function's range is a value of the function, only one direction of implication of fvelrnb 6982. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐹 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹'''𝑥) = 𝐵))
Theorem	dfaimafn 47080*	Alternate definition of the image of a function, analogous to dfimafn 6984. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ dom 𝐹) → (𝐹 “ 𝐴) = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹'''𝑥) = 𝑦})
Theorem	dfaimafn2 47081*	Alternate definition of the image of a function as an indexed union of singletons of function values, analogous to dfimafn2 6985. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ dom 𝐹) → (𝐹 “ 𝐴) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 {(𝐹'''𝑥)})
Theorem	afvelima 47082*	Function value in an image, analogous to fvelima 6987. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐵)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐹'''𝑥) = 𝐴)
Theorem	afvelrn 47083	A function's value belongs to its range, analogous to fvelrn 7110. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → (𝐹'''𝐴) ∈ ran 𝐹)
Theorem	fnafvelrn 47084	A function's value belongs to its range, analogous to fnfvelrn 7114. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹'''𝐵) ∈ ran 𝐹)
Theorem	fafvelcdm 47085	A function's value belongs to its codomain, analogous to ffvelcdm 7115. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹'''𝐶) ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	ffnafv 47086*	A function maps to a class to which all values belong, analogous to ffnfv 7153. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ↔ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹'''𝑥) ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	afvres 47087	The value of a restricted function, analogous to fvres 6939. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)'''𝐴) = (𝐹'''𝐴))
Theorem	tz6.12-afv 47088*	Function value. Theorem 6.12(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27, analogous to tz6.12 6945. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 29-Nov-2017.)
⊢ ((⟨𝐴, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐹 ∧ ∃!𝑦⟨𝐴, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐹) → (𝐹'''𝐴) = 𝑦)
Theorem	tz6.12-1-afv 47089*	Function value (Theorem 6.12(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27, analogous to tz6.12-1 6943. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 29-Nov-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐴𝐹𝑦 ∧ ∃!𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑦) → (𝐹'''𝐴) = 𝑦)
Theorem	dmfcoafv 47090	Domains of a function composition, analogous to dmfco 7018. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Jul-2017.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐺 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐺) → (𝐴 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ↔ (𝐺'''𝐴) ∈ dom 𝐹))
Theorem	afvco2 47091	Value of a function composition, analogous to fvco2 7019. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Jul-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐺 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)'''𝑋) = (𝐹'''(𝐺'''𝑋)))
Theorem	rlimdmafv 47092	Two ways to express that a function has a limit, analogous to rlimdm 15597. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 27-Nov-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ*, < ) = +∞)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝𝑟 ↔ 𝐹 ⇝𝑟 ( ⇝𝑟 '''𝐹)))
21.48.4.6  Alternative definition of the value of an operation
Theorem	aoveq123d 47093	Equality deduction for operation value, analogous to oveq123d 7469. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐶)) = ((𝐵𝐺𝐷)) )
Theorem	nfaov 47094	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for operation value, analogous to nfov 7478. To prove a deduction version of this analogous to nfovd 7477 is not quickly possible because many deduction versions for bound-variable hypothesis builder for constructs the definition of alternative operation values is based on are not available (see nfafv 47051). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 ((𝐴𝐹𝐵))
Theorem	csbaovg 47095	Move class substitution in and out of an operation. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ ((𝐵𝐹𝐶)) = ((⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)) )
Theorem	aovfundmoveq 47096	If a class is a function restricted to an ordered pair of its domain, then the value of the operation on this pair is equal for both definitions. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝐹 defAt ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) = (𝐴𝐹𝐵))
Theorem	aovnfundmuv 47097	If an ordered pair is not in the domain of a class or the class is not a function restricted to the ordered pair, then the operation value for this pair is the universal class. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐹 defAt ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) = V)
Theorem	ndmaov 47098	The value of an operation outside its domain, analogous to ndmafv 47055. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (¬ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ dom 𝐹 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) = V)
Theorem	ndmaovg 47099	The value of an operation outside its domain, analogous to ndmovg 7633. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ ((dom 𝐹 = (𝑅 × 𝑆) ∧ ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) = V)
Theorem	aovvdm 47100	If the operation value of a class for an ordered pair is a set, the ordered pair is contained in the domain of the class. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ ( ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) ∈ 𝐶 → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ dom 𝐹)