Theorem rabexgfGS 33149

Description: Separation Scheme in terms of a restricted class abstraction. To be removed in profit of Glauco's equivalent version. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-May-2017.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
rabexgfGS.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rabexgfGS	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V)

Proof of Theorem rabexgfGS

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfrab1 3434	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}
2		rabexgfGS.1	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
3	1, 2	dfssf 3903	. . 3 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
4		rabidim1 3436	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
5	3, 4	mpgbir 1831	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ 𝐴
6		elex 3474	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
7		ssexg 5284	. 2 ⊢ (({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V)
8	5, 6, 7	sylancr 599	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∈ wcel 2146  Ⅎwnfc 2910  {crab 3415  Vcvv 3453   ⊆ wss 3899

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1944  ax-6 2001  ax-7 2042  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2196  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5251

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2101  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-rab 3416  df-v 3455  df-ss 3900  df-in 4093

This theorem is used by:  abrexexd  33159