Theorem rabexgfGS 33088

Description: Separation Scheme in terms of a restricted class abstraction. To be removed in profit of Glauco's equivalent version. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 11-May-2017.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
rabexgfGS.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rabexgfGS	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V)

Proof of Theorem rabexgfGS

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfrab1 3432	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}
2		rabexgfGS.1	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
3	1, 2	dfssf 3922	. . 3 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
4		rabidim1 3434	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
5	3, 4	mpgbir 1832	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ 𝐴
6		elex 3472	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
7		ssexg 5281	. 2 ⊢ (({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V)
8	5, 6, 7	sylancr 599	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∈ wcel 2145  Ⅎwnfc 2908  {crab 3413  Vcvv 3451   ⊆ wss 3899

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2733  ax-sep 5249

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916

This theorem is used by:  abrexexd  33098