Theorem dfss2f 3970

Description: Equivalence for subclass relation, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-1994.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) Avoid ax-13 2367. (Revised by Gino Giotto, 19-May-2023.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
dfss2f.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
dfss2f.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfss2f	⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem dfss2f

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfss2 3967	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵))
2		dfss2f.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
3	2	nfcri 2886	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴
4		dfss2f.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
5	4	nfcri 2886	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵
6	3, 5	nfim 1892	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)
7		nfv 1910	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)
8		eleq1w 2812	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
9		eleq1w 2812	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
10	8, 9	imbi12d 344	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)))
11	6, 7, 10	cbvalv1 2333	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
12	1, 11	bitri 275	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205  ∀wal 1532   ∈ wcel 2099  Ⅎwnfc 2879   ⊆ wss 3947

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1790  ax-4 1804  ax-5 1906  ax-6 1964  ax-7 2004  ax-8 2101  ax-9 2109  ax-11 2147  ax-12 2167  ax-ext 2699

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-tru 1537  df-ex 1775  df-nf 1779  df-sb 2061  df-clab 2706  df-cleq 2720  df-clel 2806  df-nfc 2881  df-v 3473  df-in 3954  df-ss 3964

This theorem is referenced by:  dfss3f  3971  ssrd  3985  ssrmof  4047  ss2ab  4054  rankval4  9891  rabexgfGS  32310  ballotth  34157  dvcosre  45300  itgsinexplem1  45342