Theorem difrab2 29901

Description: Difference of two restricted class abstractions. Compare with difrab 4126. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Jan-2022.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
difrab2	⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∣ 𝜑}

Proof of Theorem difrab2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfrab1 3308	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}
2		nfrab1 3308	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}
3	1, 2	nfdif 3953	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑})
4		nfrab1 3308	. 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∣ 𝜑}
5		eldif 3801	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
6	5	anbi1i 617	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑))
7		andi 993	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∨ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)))
8		pm3.24 393	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)
9	8	biorfi 925	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∨ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)))
10		ancom 454	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))
11	7, 9, 10	3bitr2i 291	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)) ↔ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))
12	11	anbi2i 616	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ ¬ 𝜑))) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)))
13		anass 462	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ ¬ 𝜑))))
14		anass 462	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)))
15	12, 13, 14	3bitr4i 295	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑))
16	6, 15	bitr4i 270	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)))
17		rabid 3301	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑))
18		eldif 3801	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}))
19		rabid 3301	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
20		rabid 3301	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))
21	20	notbii 312	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))
22		ianor 967	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ ¬ 𝜑))
23	21, 22	bitri 267	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ ¬ 𝜑))
24	19, 23	anbi12i 620	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)))
25	18, 24	bitri 267	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)))
26	16, 17, 25	3bitr4ri 296	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∣ 𝜑})
27	3, 4, 26	eqri 29887	1 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∣ 𝜑}

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   ∧ wa 386   ∨ wo 836   = wceq 1601   ∈ wcel 2106  {crab 3093   ∖ cdif 3788

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1839  ax-4 1853  ax-5 1953  ax-6 2021  ax-7 2054  ax-9 2115  ax-10 2134  ax-11 2149  ax-12 2162  ax-13 2333  ax-ext 2753

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 199  df-an 387  df-or 837  df-tru 1605  df-ex 1824  df-nf 1828  df-sb 2012  df-clab 2763  df-cleq 2769  df-clel 2773  df-nfc 2920  df-rab 3098  df-v 3399  df-dif 3794

This theorem is referenced by:  reprdifc  31307