| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > reximdva0 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Restricted existence deduced from nonempty class. (Contributed by NM, 1-Feb-2012.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| reximdva0.1 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜓) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| reximdva0 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | n0 4288 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) | |
| 2 | reximdva0.1 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜓) | |
| 3 | 2 | ex 413 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓)) |
| 4 | 3 | ancld 555 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓))) |
| 5 | 4 | eximdv 1924 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓))) |
| 6 | 5 | imp 407 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) |
| 7 | 1, 6 | sylan2b 600 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) |
| 8 | df-rex 3065 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) | |
| 9 | 7, 8 | sylibr 235 | 1 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 396 ∃wex 1786 ∈ wcel 2119 ≠ wne 2935 ∃wrex 3064 ∅c0 4268 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1802 ax-4 1816 ax-5 1917 ax-6 1974 ax-7 2015 ax-9 2129 ax-ext 2712 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 208 df-an 397 df-tru 1550 df-fal 1560 df-ex 1787 df-sb 2074 df-clab 2719 df-cleq 2732 df-ne 2936 df-rex 3065 df-dif 3893 df-nul 4269 |
| This theorem is referenced by: n0snor2el 4771 f1cdmsn 7233 hashgt12el 14382 refun0 23505 cstucnd 24273 supxrnemnf 32867 kerunit 33415 ssdifidllem 33546 ssmxidllem 33563 constrfiss 33942 elpaddn0 40299 nelsubclem 49564 thinciso 49967 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |