| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > reximdva0 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Restricted existence deduced from nonempty class. (Contributed by NM, 1-Feb-2012.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| reximdva0.1 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜓) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| reximdva0 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | n0 4308 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) | |
| 2 | reximdva0.1 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜓) | |
| 3 | 2 | ex 417 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓)) |
| 4 | 3 | ancld 559 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓))) |
| 5 | 4 | eximdv 1947 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓))) |
| 6 | 5 | imp 411 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) |
| 7 | 1, 6 | sylan2b 605 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) |
| 8 | df-rex 3090 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) | |
| 9 | 7, 8 | sylibr 237 | 1 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 400 ∃wex 1809 ∈ wcel 2143 ≠ wne 2958 ∃wrex 3089 ∅c0 4287 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1825 ax-4 1839 ax-5 1940 ax-6 1997 ax-7 2038 ax-9 2153 ax-ext 2735 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 401 df-tru 1573 df-fal 1583 df-ex 1810 df-sb 2097 df-clab 2742 df-cleq 2755 df-ne 2959 df-rex 3090 df-dif 3909 df-nul 4288 |
| This theorem is referenced by: n0snor2el 4799 f1cdmsn 7282 hashgt12el 14461 ssdifidllem 21465 refun0 23653 cstucnd 24421 supxrnemnf 33091 kerunit 33623 ssmxidllem 33734 constrfiss 34119 elpaddn0 40552 nelsubclem 49822 thinciso 50225 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |