| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > sbcied | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution, deduction form. (Contributed by NM, 13-Dec-2014.) Avoid ax-10 2178, ax-12 2213. (Revised by GG, 12-Oct-2024.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| sbcied.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) |
| sbcied.2 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| sbcied | ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | df-sbc 3740 | . 2 ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) | |
| 2 | sbcied.1 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) | |
| 3 | sbcied.2 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
| 4 | 2, 3 | elabd3 3625 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ 𝜒)) |
| 5 | 1, 4 | bitrid 286 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| This proof depends on syntax axioms: → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 401 = wceq 1570 ∈ wcel 2145 {cab 2739 [wsbc 3739 |
| This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1828 ax-4 1842 ax-5 1943 ax-6 2000 ax-7 2041 ax-8 2147 ax-9 2155 ax-ext 2733 |
| This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-tru 1573 df-ex 1813 df-sb 2100 df-clab 2740 df-cleq 2753 df-clel 2836 df-sbc 3740 |
| This theorem is used by: sbcied2 3783 sbc2ie 3814 sbc2iedv 3815 sbc3ie 3816 sbcralt 3819 csbied 3883 euotd 5486 fmptsnd 7172 riota5f 7403 mpof1o2d 8135 fpwwe2lem11 10719 fpwwe2lem12 10720 brfi1uzind 14646 opfi1uzind 14649 sbcie3s 17333 issubc 18003 gsumvalx 18858 dmdprd 20207 dprdval 20212 isomnd 20330 issrg 20407 issrng 21094 isorng 21111 islmhm 21295 isphl 21927 istmd 24386 istgp 24389 isnlm 24987 isclm 25378 iscph 25484 iscms 25659 limcfval 26185 ewlksfval 30175 sbcies 33077 abfmpeld 33241 abfmpel 33242 rprmval 34041 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |