| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > sbcied | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution, deduction form. (Contributed by NM, 13-Dec-2014.) Avoid ax-10 2147, ax-12 2185. (Revised by GG, 12-Oct-2024.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| sbcied.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) |
| sbcied.2 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| sbcied | ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | df-sbc 3730 | . 2 ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) | |
| 2 | sbcied.1 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) | |
| 3 | sbcied.2 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
| 4 | 2, 3 | elabd3 3614 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ 𝜒)) |
| 5 | 1, 4 | bitrid 283 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 206 ∧ wa 395 = wceq 1542 ∈ wcel 2114 {cab 2715 [wsbc 3729 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1797 ax-4 1811 ax-5 1912 ax-6 1969 ax-7 2010 ax-8 2116 ax-9 2124 ax-ext 2709 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-tru 1545 df-ex 1782 df-sb 2069 df-clab 2716 df-cleq 2729 df-clel 2812 df-sbc 3730 |
| This theorem is referenced by: sbcied2 3774 sbc2ie 3805 sbc2iedv 3806 sbc3ie 3807 sbcralt 3811 csbied 3874 euotd 5461 fmptsnd 7117 riota5f 7345 fpwwe2lem11 10555 fpwwe2lem12 10556 brfi1uzind 14461 opfi1uzind 14464 sbcie3s 17123 issubc 17793 gsumvalx 18635 dmdprd 19966 dprdval 19971 isomnd 20089 issrg 20160 issrng 20812 isorng 20829 islmhm 21014 isphl 21618 istmd 24049 istgp 24052 isnlm 24650 isclm 25041 iscph 25147 iscms 25322 limcfval 25849 ewlksfval 29685 sbcies 32572 abfmpeld 32742 abfmpel 32743 rprmval 33591 f1o2d2 42688 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |