| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > sbcied | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution, deduction form. (Contributed by NM, 13-Dec-2014.) Avoid ax-10 2179, ax-12 2216. (Revised by GG, 12-Oct-2024.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| sbcied.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) |
| sbcied.2 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| sbcied | ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | df-sbc 3747 | . 2 ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) | |
| 2 | sbcied.1 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) | |
| 3 | sbcied.2 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
| 4 | 2, 3 | elabd3 3632 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ 𝜒)) |
| 5 | 1, 4 | bitrid 286 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| This proof depends on syntax axioms: → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 401 = wceq 1570 ∈ wcel 2146 {cab 2743 [wsbc 3746 |
| This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1828 ax-4 1842 ax-5 1943 ax-6 2000 ax-7 2041 ax-8 2148 ax-9 2156 ax-ext 2737 |
| This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-tru 1573 df-ex 1813 df-sb 2100 df-clab 2744 df-cleq 2757 df-clel 2840 df-sbc 3747 |
| This theorem is used by: sbcied2 3790 sbc2ie 3821 sbc2iedv 3822 sbc3ie 3823 sbcralt 3826 csbied 3890 euotd 5498 fmptsnd 7171 riota5f 7401 mpof1o2d 8123 fpwwe2lem11 10637 fpwwe2lem12 10638 brfi1uzind 14558 opfi1uzind 14561 sbcie3s 17239 issubc 17909 gsumvalx 18755 dmdprd 20093 dprdval 20098 isomnd 20216 issrg 20293 issrng 20976 isorng 20993 islmhm 21177 isphl 21807 istmd 24260 istgp 24263 isnlm 24861 isclm 25252 iscph 25358 iscms 25533 limcfval 26060 ewlksfval 29980 sbcies 32863 abfmpeld 33028 abfmpel 33029 rprmval 33829 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |