| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > sbcied | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution, deduction form. (Contributed by NM, 13-Dec-2014.) Avoid ax-10 2177, ax-12 2212. (Revised by GG, 12-Oct-2024.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| sbcied.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) |
| sbcied.2 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| sbcied | ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | df-sbc 3739 | . 2 ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) | |
| 2 | sbcied.1 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) | |
| 3 | sbcied.2 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
| 4 | 2, 3 | elabd3 3624 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ 𝜒)) |
| 5 | 1, 4 | bitrid 286 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| This proof depends on syntax axioms: → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 401 = wceq 1569 ∈ wcel 2144 {cab 2738 [wsbc 3738 |
| This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1827 ax-4 1841 ax-5 1942 ax-6 1999 ax-7 2040 ax-8 2146 ax-9 2154 ax-ext 2732 |
| This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-tru 1572 df-ex 1812 df-sb 2099 df-clab 2739 df-cleq 2752 df-clel 2835 df-sbc 3739 |
| This theorem is used by: sbcied2 3782 sbc2ie 3813 sbc2iedv 3814 sbc3ie 3815 sbcralt 3818 csbied 3882 euotd 5485 fmptsnd 7175 riota5f 7406 mpof1o2d 8140 fpwwe2lem11 10730 fpwwe2lem12 10731 brfi1uzind 14657 opfi1uzind 14660 sbcie3s 17346 issubc 18016 gsumvalx 18871 dmdprd 20220 dprdval 20225 isomnd 20343 issrg 20420 issrng 21107 isorng 21124 islmhm 21308 isphl 21940 istmd 24399 istgp 24402 isnlm 25000 isclm 25391 iscph 25497 iscms 25672 limcfval 26198 ewlksfval 30188 sbcies 33132 abfmpeld 33296 abfmpel 33297 rprmval 34095 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |