Theorem undisjrab 39287

Description: Union of two disjoint restricted class abstractions; compare unrab 4098. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 28-Feb-2020.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
undisjrab	⊢ (({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = ∅ ↔ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)})

Proof of Theorem undisjrab

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rabeq0 4157	. . 3 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)} = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
2		df-nan 1610	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
3		nanorxor 39286	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓) ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)))
4	2, 3	bitr3i 269	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)))
5	4	ralbii 3161	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)))
6		rabbi 3302	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)) ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)})
7	1, 5, 6	3bitri 289	. 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)} = ∅ ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)})
8		inrab 4099	. . 3 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)}
9	8	eqeq1i 2804	. 2 ⊢ (({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = ∅ ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)} = ∅)
10		unrab 4098	. . 3 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)}
11	10	eqeq1i 2804	. 2 ⊢ (({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)} ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)})
12	7, 9, 11	3bitr4i 295	1 ⊢ (({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = ∅ ↔ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)})

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   ↔ wb 198   ∧ wa 385   ∨ wo 874   ⊼ wnan 1609   ⊻ wxo 1634   = wceq 1653  ∀wral 3089  {crab 3093   ∪ cun 3767   ∩ cin 3768  ∅c0 4115

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1891  ax-4 1905  ax-5 2006  ax-6 2072  ax-7 2107  ax-9 2166  ax-10 2185  ax-11 2200  ax-12 2213  ax-13 2377  ax-ext 2777

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 199  df-an 386  df-or 875  df-nan 1610  df-xor 1635  df-tru 1657  df-ex 1876  df-nf 1880  df-sb 2065  df-clab 2786  df-cleq 2792  df-clel 2795  df-nfc 2930  df-ral 3094  df-rab 3098  df-v 3387  df-dif 3772  df-un 3774  df-in 3776  df-nul 4116

This theorem is referenced by: (None)