Theorem undisjrab 41010

Description: Union of two disjoint restricted class abstractions; compare unrab 4226. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 28-Feb-2020.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
undisjrab	⊢ (({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = ∅ ↔ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)})

Proof of Theorem undisjrab

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rabeq0 4292	. . 3 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)} = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
2		df-nan 1483	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
3		nanorxor 41009	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓) ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)))
4	2, 3	bitr3i 280	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)))
5	4	ralbii 3133	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)))
6		rabbi 3336	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)) ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)})
7	1, 5, 6	3bitri 300	. 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)} = ∅ ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)})
8		inrab 4227	. . 3 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)}
9	8	eqeq1i 2803	. 2 ⊢ (({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = ∅ ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)} = ∅)
10		unrab 4226	. . 3 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)}
11	10	eqeq1i 2803	. 2 ⊢ (({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)} ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)})
12	7, 9, 11	3bitr4i 306	1 ⊢ (({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = ∅ ↔ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓)})

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 399   ∨ wo 844   ⊼ wnan 1482   ⊻ wxo 1502   = wceq 1538  ∀wral 3106  {crab 3110   ∪ cun 3879   ∩ cin 3880  ∅c0 4243

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2770

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-or 845  df-nan 1483  df-xor 1503  df-tru 1541  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2070  df-clab 2777  df-cleq 2791  df-clel 2870  df-nfc 2938  df-ral 3111  df-rab 3115  df-v 3443  df-dif 3884  df-un 3886  df-in 3888  df-nul 4244

This theorem is referenced by: (None)