Theorem elrab3t 2894

Description: Membership in a restricted class abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Closed theorem version of elrab3 2896.) (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 31-Aug-2017.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
elrab3t	|- ( ( A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) /\ A e. B ) -> ( A e. { x e. B | ph } <-> ps ) )

Distinct variable groups:   x, A   x, B   ps, x

Allowed substitution hint:   ph( x)

Proof of Theorem elrab3t

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpr 110	. . 3 |- ( ( A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) /\ A e. B ) -> A e. B )
2		nfa1 1541	. . . . 5 |- F/ x A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
3		nfv 1528	. . . . 5 |- F/ x A e. B
4	2, 3	nfan 1565	. . . 4 |- F/ x ( A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) /\ A e. B )
5		simpl 109	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) /\ A e. B ) -> A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) )
6	5	19.21bi 1558	. . . . 5 |- ( ( A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) /\ A e. B ) -> ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) )
7		eleq1 2240	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( x = A -> ( x e. B <-> A e. B ) )
8	7	biimparc 299	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( ( A e. B /\ x = A ) -> x e. B )
9	8	biantrurd 305	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( ( A e. B /\ x = A ) -> ( ph <-> ( x e. B /\ ph ) ) )
10	9	bibi1d 233	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( A e. B /\ x = A ) -> ( ( ph <-> ps ) <-> ( ( x e. B /\ ph ) <-> ps ) ) )
11	10	pm5.74da 443	. . . . . 6 |- ( A e. B -> ( ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) <-> ( x = A -> ( ( x e. B /\ ph ) <-> ps ) ) ) )
12	11	adantl 277	. . . . 5 |- ( ( A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) /\ A e. B ) -> ( ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) <-> ( x = A -> ( ( x e. B /\ ph ) <-> ps ) ) ) )
13	6, 12	mpbid 147	. . . 4 |- ( ( A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) /\ A e. B ) -> ( x = A -> ( ( x e. B /\ ph ) <-> ps ) ) )
14	4, 13	alrimi 1522	. . 3 |- ( ( A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) /\ A e. B ) -> A. x ( x = A -> ( ( x e. B /\ ph ) <-> ps ) ) )
15		elabgt 2880	. . 3 |- ( ( A e. B /\ A. x ( x = A -> ( ( x e. B /\ ph ) <-> ps ) ) ) -> ( A e. { x | ( x e. B /\ ph ) } <-> ps ) )
16	1, 14, 15	syl2anc 411	. 2 |- ( ( A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) /\ A e. B ) -> ( A e. { x | ( x e. B /\ ph ) } <-> ps ) )
17		df-rab 2464	. . . 4 |- { x e. B | ph } = { x | ( x e. B /\ ph ) }
18	17	eleq2i 2244	. . 3 |- ( A e. { x e. B | ph } <-> A e. { x | ( x e. B /\ ph ) } )
19	18	bibi1i 228	. 2 |- ( ( A e. { x e. B | ph } <-> ps ) <-> ( A e. { x | ( x e. B /\ ph ) } <-> ps ) )
20	16, 19	sylibr 134	1 |- ( ( A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) /\ A e. B ) -> ( A e. { x e. B | ph } <-> ps ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   <-> wb 105   A.wal 1351   = wceq 1353   e. wcel 2148   {cab 2163   {crab 2459

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 709  ax-5 1447  ax-7 1448  ax-gen 1449  ax-ie1 1493  ax-ie2 1494  ax-8 1504  ax-10 1505  ax-11 1506  ax-i12 1507  ax-bndl 1509  ax-4 1510  ax-17 1526  ax-i9 1530  ax-ial 1534  ax-i5r 1535  ax-ext 2159

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1356  df-nf 1461  df-sb 1763  df-clab 2164  df-cleq 2170  df-clel 2173  df-nfc 2308  df-rab 2464  df-v 2741

This theorem is referenced by:  f1oresrab  5683