Theorem elrab3t 2834

Description: Membership in a restricted class abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Closed theorem version of elrab3 2836.) (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 31-Aug-2017.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
elrab3t	⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝜓,𝑥

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem elrab3t

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpr 109	. . 3 ⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
2		nfa1 1521	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
3		nfv 1508	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵
4	2, 3	nfan 1544	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
5		simpl 108	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)))
6	5	19.21bi 1537	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)))
7		eleq1 2200	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
8	7	biimparc 297	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)
9	8	biantrurd 303	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜑 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)))
10	9	bibi1d 232	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)))
11	10	pm5.74da 439	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ((𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))))
12	11	adantl 275	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))))
13	6, 12	mpbid 146	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)))
14	4, 13	alrimi 1502	. . 3 ⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)))
15		elabgt 2820	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))) → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ 𝜓))
16	1, 14, 15	syl2anc 408	. 2 ⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ 𝜓))
17		df-rab 2423	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)}
18	17	eleq2i 2204	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)})
19	18	bibi1i 227	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ 𝜓))
20	16, 19	sylibr 133	1 ⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   ↔ wb 104  ∀wal 1329   = wceq 1331   ∈ wcel 1480  {cab 2123  {crab 2418

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-bndl 1486  ax-4 1487  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2119

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1334  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736  df-clab 2124  df-cleq 2130  df-clel 2133  df-nfc 2268  df-rab 2423  df-v 2683

This theorem is referenced by:  f1oresrab  5578