Theorem elrab3t 2885

Description: Membership in a restricted class abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Closed theorem version of elrab3 2887.) (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 31-Aug-2017.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
elrab3t	⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝜓,𝑥

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem elrab3t

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpr 109	. . 3 ⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
2		nfa1 1534	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
3		nfv 1521	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵
4	2, 3	nfan 1558	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
5		simpl 108	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)))
6	5	19.21bi 1551	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)))
7		eleq1 2233	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
8	7	biimparc 297	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)
9	8	biantrurd 303	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜑 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)))
10	9	bibi1d 232	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)))
11	10	pm5.74da 441	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ((𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))))
12	11	adantl 275	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))))
13	6, 12	mpbid 146	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)))
14	4, 13	alrimi 1515	. . 3 ⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)))
15		elabgt 2871	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))) → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ 𝜓))
16	1, 14, 15	syl2anc 409	. 2 ⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ 𝜓))
17		df-rab 2457	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)}
18	17	eleq2i 2237	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)})
19	18	bibi1i 227	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ 𝜓))
20	16, 19	sylibr 133	1 ⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   ↔ wb 104  ∀wal 1346   = wceq 1348   ∈ wcel 2141  {cab 2156  {crab 2452

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 704  ax-5 1440  ax-7 1441  ax-gen 1442  ax-ie1 1486  ax-ie2 1487  ax-8 1497  ax-10 1498  ax-11 1499  ax-i12 1500  ax-bndl 1502  ax-4 1503  ax-17 1519  ax-i9 1523  ax-ial 1527  ax-i5r 1528  ax-ext 2152

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1351  df-nf 1454  df-sb 1756  df-clab 2157  df-cleq 2163  df-clel 2166  df-nfc 2301  df-rab 2457  df-v 2732

This theorem is referenced by:  f1oresrab  5661