Theorem pwtrufal 13365

Description: A subset of the singleton { (/) } cannot be anything other than (/) or { (/) }. Removing the double negation would change the meaning, as seen at exmid01 4129. If we view a subset of a singleton as a truth value (as seen in theorems like exmidexmid 4128), then this theorem states there are no truth values other than true and false, as described in section 1.1 of [Bauer], p. 481. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 11-Sep-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
pwtrufal	|- ( A C_ { (/) } -> -. -. ( A = (/) \/ A = { (/) } ) )

Proof of Theorem pwtrufal

Dummy variable x is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simprr 522	. . . . 5 |- ( ( A C_ { (/) } /\ ( -. A = (/) /\ -. A = { (/) } ) ) -> -. A = { (/) } )
2		simpll 519	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( ( ( A C_ { (/) } /\ ( -. A = (/) /\ -. A = { (/) } ) ) /\ x e. A ) -> A C_ { (/) } )
3		simpl 108	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 |- ( ( A C_ { (/) } /\ ( -. A = (/) /\ -. A = { (/) } ) ) -> A C_ { (/) } )
4	3	sselda 3102	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- ( ( ( A C_ { (/) } /\ ( -. A = (/) /\ -. A = { (/) } ) ) /\ x e. A ) -> x e. { (/) } )
5		elsni 3550	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- ( x e. { (/) } -> x = (/) )
6	4, 5	syl 14	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( ( ( A C_ { (/) } /\ ( -. A = (/) /\ -. A = { (/) } ) ) /\ x e. A ) -> x = (/) )
7		simpr 109	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( ( ( A C_ { (/) } /\ ( -. A = (/) /\ -. A = { (/) } ) ) /\ x e. A ) -> x e. A )
8	6, 7	eqeltrrd 2218	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( ( ( A C_ { (/) } /\ ( -. A = (/) /\ -. A = { (/) } ) ) /\ x e. A ) -> (/) e. A )
9	8	snssd 3673	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( ( ( A C_ { (/) } /\ ( -. A = (/) /\ -. A = { (/) } ) ) /\ x e. A ) -> { (/) } C_ A )
10	2, 9	eqssd 3119	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( ( A C_ { (/) } /\ ( -. A = (/) /\ -. A = { (/) } ) ) /\ x e. A ) -> A = { (/) } )
11	10	ex 114	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( A C_ { (/) } /\ ( -. A = (/) /\ -. A = { (/) } ) ) -> ( x e. A -> A = { (/) } ) )
12	11	exlimdv 1792	. . . . 5 |- ( ( A C_ { (/) } /\ ( -. A = (/) /\ -. A = { (/) } ) ) -> ( E. x x e. A -> A = { (/) } ) )
13	1, 12	mtod 653	. . . 4 |- ( ( A C_ { (/) } /\ ( -. A = (/) /\ -. A = { (/) } ) ) -> -. E. x x e. A )
14		notm0 3388	. . . 4 |- ( -. E. x x e. A <-> A = (/) )
15	13, 14	sylib 121	. . 3 |- ( ( A C_ { (/) } /\ ( -. A = (/) /\ -. A = { (/) } ) ) -> A = (/) )
16		simprl 521	. . 3 |- ( ( A C_ { (/) } /\ ( -. A = (/) /\ -. A = { (/) } ) ) -> -. A = (/) )
17	15, 16	pm2.65da 651	. 2 |- ( A C_ { (/) } -> -. ( -. A = (/) /\ -. A = { (/) } ) )
18		ioran 742	. 2 |- ( -. ( A = (/) \/ A = { (/) } ) <-> ( -. A = (/) /\ -. A = { (/) } ) )
19	17, 18	sylnibr 667	1 |- ( A C_ { (/) } -> -. -. ( A = (/) \/ A = { (/) } ) )

Syntax hints:   -. wn 3   -> wi 4   /\ wa 103   \/ wo 698   = wceq 1332   E.wex 1469   e. wcel 1481   C_ wss 3076   (/)c0 3368   {csn 3532

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 604  ax-in2 605  ax-io 699  ax-5 1424  ax-7 1425  ax-gen 1426  ax-ie1 1470  ax-ie2 1471  ax-8 1483  ax-10 1484  ax-11 1485  ax-i12 1486  ax-bndl 1487  ax-4 1488  ax-17 1507  ax-i9 1511  ax-ial 1515  ax-i5r 1516  ax-ext 2122

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1335  df-fal 1338  df-nf 1438  df-sb 1737  df-clab 2127  df-cleq 2133  df-clel 2136  df-nfc 2271  df-v 2691  df-dif 3078  df-in 3082  df-ss 3089  df-nul 3369  df-sn 3538

This theorem is referenced by:  pwle2  13366