Theorem exmidexmid 4229

Description: EXMID implies that an arbitrary proposition is decidable. That is, EXMID captures the usual meaning of excluded middle when stated in terms of propositions.

To get other propositional statements which are equivalent to excluded middle, combine this with notnotrdc 844, peircedc 915, or condc 854.

(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Jun-2022.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
exmidexmid	|- (EXMID -> DECID ph )

Proof of Theorem exmidexmid

Dummy variables x z are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ssrab2 3268	. . 3 |- { z e. { (/) } | ph } C_ { (/) }
2		df-exmid 4228	. . . 4 |- (EXMID <-> A. x ( x C_ { (/) } -> DECID (/) e. x ) )
3		p0ex 4221	. . . . . 6 |- { (/) } e. _V
4	3	rabex 4177	. . . . 5 |- { z e. { (/) } | ph } e. _V
5		sseq1 3206	. . . . . 6 |- ( x = { z e. { (/) } | ph } -> ( x C_ { (/) } <-> { z e. { (/) } | ph } C_ { (/) } ) )
6		eleq2 2260	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x = { z e. { (/) } | ph } -> ( (/) e. x <-> (/) e. { z e. { (/) } | ph } ) )
7	6	dcbid 839	. . . . . 6 |- ( x = { z e. { (/) } | ph } -> (DECID (/) e. x <-> DECID (/) e. { z e. { (/) } | ph } ) )
8	5, 7	imbi12d 234	. . . . 5 |- ( x = { z e. { (/) } | ph } -> ( ( x C_ { (/) } -> DECID (/) e. x ) <-> ( { z e. { (/) } | ph } C_ { (/) } -> DECID (/) e. { z e. { (/) } | ph } ) ) )
9	4, 8	spcv 2858	. . . 4 |- ( A. x ( x C_ { (/) } -> DECID (/) e. x ) -> ( { z e. { (/) } | ph } C_ { (/) } -> DECID (/) e. { z e. { (/) } | ph } ) )
10	2, 9	sylbi 121	. . 3 |- (EXMID -> ( { z e. { (/) } | ph } C_ { (/) } -> DECID (/) e. { z e. { (/) } | ph } ) )
11	1, 10	mpi 15	. 2 |- (EXMID -> DECID (/) e. { z e. { (/) } | ph } )
12		0ex 4160	. . . . 5 |- (/) e. _V
13	12	snid 3653	. . . 4 |- (/) e. { (/) }
14		biidd 172	. . . . 5 |- ( z = (/) -> ( ph <-> ph ) )
15	14	elrab 2920	. . . 4 |- ( (/) e. { z e. { (/) } | ph } <-> ( (/) e. { (/) } /\ ph ) )
16	13, 15	mpbiran 942	. . 3 |- ( (/) e. { z e. { (/) } | ph } <-> ph )
17	16	dcbii 841	. 2 |- (DECID (/) e. { z e. { (/) } | ph } <-> DECID ph )
18	11, 17	sylib 122	1 |- (EXMID -> DECID ph )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4  DECID wdc 835   A.wal 1362   = wceq 1364   e. wcel 2167   {crab 2479   C_ wss 3157   (/)c0 3450   {csn 3622  EXMIDwem 4227

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 710  ax-5 1461  ax-7 1462  ax-gen 1463  ax-ie1 1507  ax-ie2 1508  ax-8 1518  ax-10 1519  ax-11 1520  ax-i12 1521  ax-bndl 1523  ax-4 1524  ax-17 1540  ax-i9 1544  ax-ial 1548  ax-i5r 1549  ax-14 2170  ax-ext 2178  ax-sep 4151  ax-nul 4159  ax-pow 4207

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-dc 836  df-tru 1367  df-nf 1475  df-sb 1777  df-clab 2183  df-cleq 2189  df-clel 2192  df-nfc 2328  df-rab 2484  df-v 2765  df-dif 3159  df-in 3163  df-ss 3170  df-nul 3451  df-pw 3607  df-sn 3628  df-exmid 4228

This theorem is referenced by:  exmidn0m  4234  exmid0el  4237  exmidel  4238  exmidundif  4239  exmidundifim  4240  exmidpw2en  6973  sbthlemi3  7025  sbthlemi5  7027  sbthlemi6  7028  exmidomniim  7207  exmidfodomrlemim  7268  exmidontriimlem1  7288  exmidapne  7327