Theorem dfrab3ss 3395

Description: Restricted class abstraction with a common superset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Sep-2015.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 8-Nov-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfrab3ss	⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem dfrab3ss

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-ss 3124	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐴)
2		ineq1 3311	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐴 → ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) = (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}))
3	2	eqcomd 2170	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}))
4	1, 3	sylbi 120	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}))
5		dfrab3 3393	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
6		dfrab3 3393	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = (𝐵 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
7	6	ineq2i 3315	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) = (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}))
8		inass 3327	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) = (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}))
9	7, 8	eqtr4i 2188	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
10	4, 5, 9	3eqtr4g 2222	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1342  {cab 2150  {crab 2446   ∩ cin 3110   ⊆ wss 3111

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 699  ax-5 1434  ax-7 1435  ax-gen 1436  ax-ie1 1480  ax-ie2 1481  ax-8 1491  ax-10 1492  ax-11 1493  ax-i12 1494  ax-bndl 1496  ax-4 1497  ax-17 1513  ax-i9 1517  ax-ial 1521  ax-i5r 1522  ax-ext 2146

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1345  df-nf 1448  df-sb 1750  df-clab 2151  df-cleq 2157  df-clel 2160  df-nfc 2295  df-rab 2451  df-v 2723  df-in 3117  df-ss 3124

This theorem is referenced by: (None)