Theorem dfrab3ss 3437

Description: Restricted class abstraction with a common superset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Sep-2015.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 8-Nov-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfrab3ss	⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem dfrab3ss

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-ss 3166	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐴)
2		ineq1 3353	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐴 → ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) = (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}))
3	2	eqcomd 2199	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}))
4	1, 3	sylbi 121	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}))
5		dfrab3 3435	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
6		dfrab3 3435	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = (𝐵 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
7	6	ineq2i 3357	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) = (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}))
8		inass 3369	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) = (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}))
9	7, 8	eqtr4i 2217	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
10	4, 5, 9	3eqtr4g 2251	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1364  {cab 2179  {crab 2476   ∩ cin 3152   ⊆ wss 3153

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1458  ax-7 1459  ax-gen 1460  ax-ie1 1504  ax-ie2 1505  ax-8 1515  ax-10 1516  ax-11 1517  ax-i12 1518  ax-bndl 1520  ax-4 1521  ax-17 1537  ax-i9 1541  ax-ial 1545  ax-i5r 1546  ax-ext 2175

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1367  df-nf 1472  df-sb 1774  df-clab 2180  df-cleq 2186  df-clel 2189  df-nfc 2325  df-rab 2481  df-v 2762  df-in 3159  df-ss 3166

This theorem is referenced by: (None)