P. 35 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 3401-3500   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	ssrind 3401	Add right intersection to subclass relation. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶))
Theorem	ss2in 3402	Intersection of subclasses. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-2000.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐷))
Theorem	ssinss1 3403	Intersection preserves subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶)
Theorem	inss 3404	Inclusion of an intersection of two classes. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∨ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶)
2.1.13.4  Combinations of difference, union, and intersection of two classes
Theorem	unabs 3405	Absorption law for union. (Contributed by NM, 16-Apr-2006.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) = 𝐴
Theorem	inabs 3406	Absorption law for intersection. (Contributed by NM, 16-Apr-2006.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) = 𝐴
Theorem	dfss4st 3407*	Subclass defined in terms of class difference. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥STAB 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐵 ∖ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)) = 𝐴))
Theorem	ssddif 3408	Double complement and subset. Similar to ddifss 3412 but inside a class 𝐵 instead of the universal class V. In classical logic the subset operation on the right hand side could be an equality (that is, 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐵 ∖ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)) = 𝐴). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jul-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐵 ∖ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)))
Theorem	unssdif 3409	Union of two classes and class difference. In classical logic this would be an equality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jul-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ⊆ (V ∖ ((V ∖ 𝐴) ∖ 𝐵))
Theorem	inssdif 3410	Intersection of two classes and class difference. In classical logic this would be an equality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jul-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ (V ∖ 𝐵))
Theorem	difin 3411	Difference with intersection. Theorem 33 of [Suppes] p. 29. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∖ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)
Theorem	ddifss 3412	Double complement under universal class. In classical logic (or given an additional hypothesis, as in ddifnel 3305), this is equality rather than subset. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jul-2018.)
⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ (V ∖ (V ∖ 𝐴))
Theorem	unssin 3413	Union as a subset of class complement and intersection (De Morgan's law). One direction of the definition of union in [Mendelson] p. 231. This would be an equality, rather than subset, in classical logic. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Jul-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ⊆ (V ∖ ((V ∖ 𝐴) ∩ (V ∖ 𝐵)))
Theorem	inssun 3414	Intersection in terms of class difference and union (De Morgan's law). Similar to Exercise 4.10(n) of [Mendelson] p. 231. This would be an equality, rather than subset, in classical logic. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Jul-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (V ∖ ((V ∖ 𝐴) ∪ (V ∖ 𝐵)))
Theorem	inssddif 3415	Intersection of two classes and class difference. In classical logic, such as Exercise 4.10(q) of [Mendelson] p. 231, this is an equality rather than subset. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jul-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵))
Theorem	invdif 3416	Intersection with universal complement. Remark in [Stoll] p. 20. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∩ (V ∖ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)
Theorem	indif 3417	Intersection with class difference. Theorem 34 of [Suppes] p. 29. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)
Theorem	indif2 3418	Bring an intersection in and out of a class difference. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 15-Jul-2009.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∖ 𝐶)
Theorem	indif1 3419	Bring an intersection in and out of a class difference. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∖ 𝐶) ∩ 𝐵) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∖ 𝐶)
Theorem	indifcom 3420	Commutation law for intersection and difference. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Feb-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) = (𝐵 ∩ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐶))
Theorem	indi 3421	Distributive law for intersection over union. Exercise 10 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 17. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2002.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∪ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶))
Theorem	undi 3422	Distributive law for union over intersection. Exercise 11 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 17. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2002.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐶))
Theorem	indir 3423	Distributive law for intersection over union. Theorem 28 of [Suppes] p. 27. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2002.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐶) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) ∪ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶))
Theorem	undir 3424	Distributive law for union over intersection. Theorem 29 of [Suppes] p. 27. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2002.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∪ 𝐶) = ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶))
Theorem	uneqin 3425	Equality of union and intersection implies equality of their arguments. (Contributed by NM, 16-Apr-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	difundi 3426	Distributive law for class difference. Theorem 39 of [Suppes] p. 29. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∖ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐶))
Theorem	difundir 3427	Distributive law for class difference. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ 𝐶) = ((𝐴 ∖ 𝐶) ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶))
Theorem	difindiss 3428	Distributive law for class difference. In classical logic, for example, theorem 40 of [Suppes] p. 29, this is an equality instead of subset. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jul-2018.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∪ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐶)) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶))
Theorem	difindir 3429	Distributive law for class difference. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∖ 𝐶) = ((𝐴 ∖ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶))
Theorem	indifdir 3430	Distribute intersection over difference. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Apr-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐶) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) ∖ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶))
Theorem	difdif2ss 3431	Set difference with a set difference. In classical logic this would be equality rather than subset. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Jul-2018.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∪ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶)) ⊆ (𝐴 ∖ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶))
Theorem	undm 3432	De Morgan's law for union. Theorem 5.2(13) of [Stoll] p. 19. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (V ∖ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) = ((V ∖ 𝐴) ∩ (V ∖ 𝐵))
Theorem	indmss 3433	De Morgan's law for intersection. In classical logic, this would be equality rather than subset, as in Theorem 5.2(13') of [Stoll] p. 19. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Jul-2018.)
⊢ ((V ∖ 𝐴) ∪ (V ∖ 𝐵)) ⊆ (V ∖ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))
Theorem	difun1 3434	A relationship involving double difference and union. (Contributed by NM, 29-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∖ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∖ 𝐶)
Theorem	undif3ss 3435	A subset relationship involving class union and class difference. In classical logic, this would be equality rather than subset, as in the first equality of Exercise 13 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 22. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Jul-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ⊆ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴))
Theorem	difin2 3436	Represent a set difference as an intersection with a larger difference. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) = ((𝐶 ∖ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐴))
Theorem	dif32 3437	Swap second and third argument of double difference. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∖ 𝐶) = ((𝐴 ∖ 𝐶) ∖ 𝐵)
Theorem	difabs 3438	Absorption-like law for class difference: you can remove a class only once. (Contributed by FL, 2-Aug-2009.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∖ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)
Theorem	symdif1 3439	Two ways to express symmetric difference. This theorem shows the equivalence of the definition of symmetric difference in [Stoll] p. 13 and the restated definition in Example 4.1 of [Stoll] p. 262. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)) = ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))
2.1.13.5  Class abstractions with difference, union, and intersection of two classes
Theorem	symdifxor 3440*	Expressing symmetric difference with exclusive-or or two differences. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Jul-2018.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴)) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ⊻ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)}
Theorem	unab 3441	Union of two class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2002.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)}
Theorem	inab 3442	Intersection of two class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2002.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)}
Theorem	difab 3443	Difference of two class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∖ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)}
Theorem	notab 3444	A class builder defined by a negation. (Contributed by FL, 18-Sep-2010.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ ¬ 𝜑} = (V ∖ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
Theorem	unrab 3445	Union of two restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-2004.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)}
Theorem	inrab 3446	Intersection of two restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 1-Sep-2006.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)}
Theorem	inrab2 3447*	Intersection with a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-2007.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	difrab 3448	Difference of two restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-2004.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)}
Theorem	dfrab2 3449*	Alternate definition of restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2003.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ 𝐴)
Theorem	dfrab3 3450*	Alternate definition of restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
Theorem	notrab 3451*	Complementation of restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝜑}
Theorem	dfrab3ss 3452*	Restricted class abstraction with a common superset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Sep-2015.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 8-Nov-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}))
Theorem	rabun2 3453	Abstraction restricted to a union. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Feb-2015.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∣ 𝜑} = ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑})
2.1.13.6  Restricted uniqueness with difference, union, and intersection
Theorem	reuss2 3454*	Transfer uniqueness to a smaller subclass. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2005.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓)) ∧ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	reuss 3455*	Transfer uniqueness to a smaller subclass. (Contributed by NM, 21-Aug-1999.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	reuun1 3456*	Transfer uniqueness to a smaller class. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	reuun2 3457*	Transfer uniqueness to a smaller or larger class. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2005.)
⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
Theorem	reupick 3458*	Restricted uniqueness "picks" a member of a subclass. (Contributed by NM, 21-Aug-1999.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)) ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	reupick3 3459*	Restricted uniqueness "picks" a member of a subclass. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Nov-2016.)
⊢ ((∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	reupick2 3460*	Restricted uniqueness "picks" a member of a subclass. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Dec-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 19-Nov-2016.)
⊢ (((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 → 𝜑) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ∧ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
2.1.14  The empty set
Syntax	c0 3461	Extend class notation to include the empty set.
class ∅
Definition	df-nul 3462	Define the empty set. Special case of Exercise 4.10(o) of [Mendelson] p. 231. For a more traditional definition, but requiring a dummy variable, see dfnul2 3463. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
⊢ ∅ = (V ∖ V)
Theorem	dfnul2 3463	Alternate definition of the empty set. Definition 5.14 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 20. (Contributed by NM, 26-Dec-1996.)
⊢ ∅ = {𝑥 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑥}
Theorem	dfnul3 3464	Alternate definition of the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-2004.)
⊢ ∅ = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴}
Theorem	noel 3465	The empty set has no elements. Theorem 6.14 of [Quine] p. 44. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 1-Sep-2015.)
⊢ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ ∅
Theorem	nel02 3466	The empty set has no elements. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 4-Jan-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	n0i 3467	If a set has elements, it is not empty. A set with elements is also inhabited, see elex2 2789. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-1993.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → ¬ 𝐴 = ∅)
Theorem	ne0i 3468	If a set has elements, it is not empty. A set with elements is also inhabited, see elex2 2789. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-1993.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	ne0d 3469	Deduction form of ne0i 3468. If a class has elements, then it is nonempty. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	n0ii 3470	If a class has elements, then it is not empty. Inference associated with n0i 3467. (Contributed by BJ, 15-Jul-2021.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝐵 = ∅
Theorem	ne0ii 3471	If a class has elements, then it is nonempty. Inference associated with ne0i 3468. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Dec-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐵 ≠ ∅
Theorem	vn0 3472	The universal class is not equal to the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 11-Sep-2008.)
⊢ V ≠ ∅
Theorem	vn0m 3473	The universal class is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Dec-2018.)
⊢ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ V
Theorem	n0rf 3474	An inhabited class is nonempty. Following the Definition of [Bauer], p. 483, we call a class 𝐴 nonempty if 𝐴 ≠ ∅ and inhabited if it has at least one element. In classical logic these two concepts are equivalent, for example see Proposition 5.17(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 20. This version of n0r 3475 requires only that 𝑥 not be free in, rather than not occur in, 𝐴. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jul-2018.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	n0r 3475*	An inhabited class is nonempty. See n0rf 3474 for more discussion. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jul-2018.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	neq0r 3476*	An inhabited class is nonempty. See n0rf 3474 for more discussion. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jul-2018.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ¬ 𝐴 = ∅)
Theorem	reximdva0m 3477*	Restricted existence deduced from inhabited class. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jul-2018.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	n0mmoeu 3478*	A case of equivalence of "at most one" and "only one". If a class is inhabited, that class having at most one element is equivalent to it having only one element. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jul-2018.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (∃*𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃!𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	rex0 3479	Vacuous existential quantification is false. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-2003.)
⊢ ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ ∅ 𝜑
Theorem	eq0 3480*	The empty set has no elements. Theorem 2 of [Suppes] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 29-Aug-1993.)
⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	eqv 3481*	The universe contains every set. (Contributed by NM, 11-Sep-2006.)
⊢ (𝐴 = V ↔ ∀𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	notm0 3482*	A class is not inhabited if and only if it is empty. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Jul-2022.)
⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 = ∅)
Theorem	nel0 3483*	From the general negation of membership in 𝐴, infer that 𝐴 is the empty set. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.)
⊢ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = ∅
Theorem	0el 3484*	Membership of the empty set in another class. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jun-2004.)
⊢ (∅ ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)
Theorem	abvor0dc 3485*	The class builder of a decidable proposition not containing the abstraction variable is either the universal class or the empty set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Aug-2018.)
⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = V ∨ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = ∅))
Theorem	abn0r 3486	Nonempty class abstraction. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Aug-2018.)
⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ≠ ∅)
Theorem	abn0m 3487*	Inhabited class abstraction. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Jul-2022.)
⊢ (∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∃𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	rabn0r 3488	Nonempty restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Aug-2018.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ≠ ∅)
Theorem	rabn0m 3489*	Inhabited restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Sep-2018.)
⊢ (∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	rab0 3490	Any restricted class abstraction restricted to the empty set is empty. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∈ ∅ ∣ 𝜑} = ∅
Theorem	rabeq0 3491	Condition for a restricted class abstraction to be empty. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 7-Jun-2010.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	abeq0 3492	Condition for a class abstraction to be empty. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Aug-2018.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	rabxmdc 3493*	Law of excluded middle given decidability, in terms of restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Aug-2018.)
⊢ (∀𝑥DECID 𝜑 → 𝐴 = ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝜑}))
Theorem	rabnc 3494*	Law of noncontradiction, in terms of restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 20-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝜑}) = ∅
Theorem	un0 3495	The union of a class with the empty set is itself. Theorem 24 of [Suppes] p. 27. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∪ ∅) = 𝐴
Theorem	in0 3496	The intersection of a class with the empty set is the empty set. Theorem 16 of [Suppes] p. 26. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∩ ∅) = ∅
Theorem	0in 3497	The intersection of the empty set with a class is the empty set. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 17-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (∅ ∩ 𝐴) = ∅
Theorem	inv1 3498	The intersection of a class with the universal class is itself. Exercise 4.10(k) of [Mendelson] p. 231. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1998.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∩ V) = 𝐴
Theorem	unv 3499	The union of a class with the universal class is the universal class. Exercise 4.10(l) of [Mendelson] p. 231. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1998.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∪ V) = V
Theorem	0ss 3500	The null set is a subset of any class. Part of Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
⊢ ∅ ⊆ 𝐴