Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > notrab | GIF version |
Description: Complementation of restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Sep-2015.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
notrab | ⊢ (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝜑} |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | difab 3391 | . 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} ∖ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)} | |
2 | difin 3359 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∖ (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})) = (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) | |
3 | dfrab3 3398 | . . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) | |
4 | 3 | difeq2i 3237 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}) = (𝐴 ∖ (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})) |
5 | abid2 2287 | . . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴 | |
6 | 5 | difeq1i 3236 | . . 3 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} ∖ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) = (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) |
7 | 2, 4, 6 | 3eqtr4i 2196 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}) = ({𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} ∖ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) |
8 | df-rab 2453 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)} | |
9 | 1, 7, 8 | 3eqtr4i 2196 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝜑} |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 ∧ wa 103 = wceq 1343 ∈ wcel 2136 {cab 2151 {crab 2448 ∖ cdif 3113 ∩ cin 3115 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-in1 604 ax-in2 605 ax-io 699 ax-5 1435 ax-7 1436 ax-gen 1437 ax-ie1 1481 ax-ie2 1482 ax-8 1492 ax-10 1493 ax-11 1494 ax-i12 1495 ax-bndl 1497 ax-4 1498 ax-17 1514 ax-i9 1518 ax-ial 1522 ax-i5r 1523 ax-ext 2147 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-tru 1346 df-fal 1349 df-nf 1449 df-sb 1751 df-clab 2152 df-cleq 2158 df-clel 2161 df-nfc 2297 df-ral 2449 df-rab 2453 df-v 2728 df-dif 3118 df-in 3122 |
This theorem is referenced by: diffitest 6853 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |