| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > notrab | GIF version | ||
| Description: Complementation of restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Sep-2015.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| notrab | ⊢ (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝜑} |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | difab 3446 | . 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} ∖ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)} | |
| 2 | difin 3414 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∖ (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})) = (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) | |
| 3 | dfrab3 3453 | . . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) | |
| 4 | 3 | difeq2i 3292 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}) = (𝐴 ∖ (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})) |
| 5 | abid2 2327 | . . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴 | |
| 6 | 5 | difeq1i 3291 | . . 3 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} ∖ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) = (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) |
| 7 | 2, 4, 6 | 3eqtr4i 2237 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}) = ({𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} ∖ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) |
| 8 | df-rab 2494 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)} | |
| 9 | 1, 7, 8 | 3eqtr4i 2237 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝜑} |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 ∧ wa 104 = wceq 1373 ∈ wcel 2177 {cab 2192 {crab 2489 ∖ cdif 3167 ∩ cin 3169 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-in1 615 ax-in2 616 ax-io 711 ax-5 1471 ax-7 1472 ax-gen 1473 ax-ie1 1517 ax-ie2 1518 ax-8 1528 ax-10 1529 ax-11 1530 ax-i12 1531 ax-bndl 1533 ax-4 1534 ax-17 1550 ax-i9 1554 ax-ial 1558 ax-i5r 1559 ax-ext 2188 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-tru 1376 df-fal 1379 df-nf 1485 df-sb 1787 df-clab 2193 df-cleq 2199 df-clel 2202 df-nfc 2338 df-ral 2490 df-rab 2494 df-v 2775 df-dif 3172 df-in 3176 |
| This theorem is referenced by: diffitest 6999 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |