| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer | 
      
      
      < Previous  
      Next >
      
       Nearby theorems  | 
  ||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > notrab | GIF version | ||
| Description: Complementation of restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Sep-2015.) | 
| Ref | Expression | 
|---|---|
| notrab | ⊢ (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝜑} | 
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression | 
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | difab 3432 | . 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} ∖ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)} | |
| 2 | difin 3400 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∖ (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})) = (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) | |
| 3 | dfrab3 3439 | . . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) | |
| 4 | 3 | difeq2i 3278 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}) = (𝐴 ∖ (𝐴 ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})) | 
| 5 | abid2 2317 | . . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} = 𝐴 | |
| 6 | 5 | difeq1i 3277 | . . 3 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} ∖ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) = (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) | 
| 7 | 2, 4, 6 | 3eqtr4i 2227 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}) = ({𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴} ∖ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) | 
| 8 | df-rab 2484 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)} | |
| 9 | 1, 7, 8 | 3eqtr4i 2227 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝜑} | 
| Colors of variables: wff set class | 
| Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 ∧ wa 104 = wceq 1364 ∈ wcel 2167 {cab 2182 {crab 2479 ∖ cdif 3154 ∩ cin 3156 | 
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-in1 615 ax-in2 616 ax-io 710 ax-5 1461 ax-7 1462 ax-gen 1463 ax-ie1 1507 ax-ie2 1508 ax-8 1518 ax-10 1519 ax-11 1520 ax-i12 1521 ax-bndl 1523 ax-4 1524 ax-17 1540 ax-i9 1544 ax-ial 1548 ax-i5r 1549 ax-ext 2178 | 
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-tru 1367 df-fal 1370 df-nf 1475 df-sb 1777 df-clab 2183 df-cleq 2189 df-clel 2192 df-nfc 2328 df-ral 2480 df-rab 2484 df-v 2765 df-dif 3159 df-in 3163 | 
| This theorem is referenced by: diffitest 6948 | 
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |