Theorem r19.9rmv 3500

Description: Restricted quantification of wff not containing quantified variable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Aug-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
r19.9rmv	⊢ (∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑦,𝐴   𝜑,𝑥

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem r19.9rmv

Dummy variable 𝑎 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eleq1 2229	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑦 → (𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
2	1	cbvexv 1906	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑎 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
3		eleq1 2229	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑥 → (𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
4	3	cbvexv 1906	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑎 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
5		df-rex 2450	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
6		19.41v 1890	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
7	5, 6	bitri 183	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
8	7	baibr 910	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
9	4, 8	sylbi 120	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑎 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))
10	2, 9	sylbir 134	1 ⊢ (∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   ↔ wb 104  ∃wex 1480   ∈ wcel 2136  ∃wrex 2445

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-5 1435  ax-7 1436  ax-gen 1437  ax-ie1 1481  ax-ie2 1482  ax-8 1492  ax-4 1498  ax-17 1514  ax-i9 1518  ax-ial 1522  ax-ext 2147

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-cleq 2158  df-clel 2161  df-rex 2450

This theorem is referenced by:  r19.45mv  3502  r19.44mv  3503  iunconstm  3874  fconstfvm  5703  frecabcl  6367  ltexprlemloc  7548  lcmgcdlem  12009