Theorem r2exf 2528

Description: Double restricted existential quantification. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
r2alf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴

Assertion

Ref	Expression
r2exf	⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐴(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐵(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem r2exf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-rex 2494	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
2		r2alf.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
3	2	nfcri 2346	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
4	3	19.42 1714	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)))
5		anass 401	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)))
6	5	exbii 1631	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)))
7		df-rex 2494	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))
8	7	anbi2i 457	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)))
9	4, 6, 8	3bitr4i 212	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
10	9	exbii 1631	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
11	1, 10	bitr4i 187	1 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑))

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105  ∃wex 1518   ∈ wcel 2180  Ⅎwnfc 2339  ∃wrex 2489

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 713  ax-5 1473  ax-7 1474  ax-gen 1475  ax-ie1 1519  ax-ie2 1520  ax-8 1530  ax-10 1531  ax-11 1532  ax-i12 1533  ax-bndl 1535  ax-4 1536  ax-17 1552  ax-i9 1556  ax-ial 1560  ax-i5r 1561  ax-ext 2191

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-nf 1487  df-sb 1789  df-cleq 2202  df-clel 2205  df-nfc 2341  df-rex 2494

This theorem is referenced by:  r2ex  2530  rexcomf  2673