Theorem axacndlem3 10054

Description: Lemma for the Axiom of Choice with no distinct variable conditions. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2380. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
axacndlem3	⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∃𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(∀𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑤) → ∃𝑤∀𝑦(∃𝑤((𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑤) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑤)))

Proof of Theorem axacndlem3

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfae 2445	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧
2		simpl 487	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑤) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧)
3	2	alimi 1814	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑤) → ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧)
4		nd3 10034	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧)
5	4	pm2.21d 121	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → (∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 → ∃𝑤∀𝑦(∃𝑤((𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑤) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑤)))
6	3, 5	syl5 34	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → (∀𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑤) → ∃𝑤∀𝑦(∃𝑤((𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑤) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑤)))
7	1, 6	alrimi 2212	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑧(∀𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑤) → ∃𝑤∀𝑦(∃𝑤((𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑤) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑤)))
8	7	axc4i 2331	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑦∀𝑧(∀𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑤) → ∃𝑤∀𝑦(∃𝑤((𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑤) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑤)))
9	8	19.8ad 2180	1 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∃𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(∀𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑤) → ∃𝑤∀𝑦(∃𝑤((𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑤) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑤)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400  ∀wal 1537  ∃wex 1782

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2016  ax-8 2114  ax-9 2122  ax-10 2143  ax-11 2159  ax-12 2176  ax-13 2380  ax-ext 2730  ax-sep 5162  ax-nul 5169  ax-pr 5291  ax-reg 9074

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 846  df-tru 1542  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2071  df-clab 2737  df-cleq 2751  df-clel 2831  df-ral 3073  df-rex 3074  df-v 3409  df-dif 3857  df-un 3859  df-nul 4222  df-sn 4516  df-pr 4518

This theorem is referenced by:  axacndlem5  10056  axacnd  10057