Theorem axacndlem3 10020

Description: Lemma for the Axiom of Choice with no distinct variable conditions. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2379. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
axacndlem3	⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∃𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(∀𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑤) → ∃𝑤∀𝑦(∃𝑤((𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑤) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑤)))

Proof of Theorem axacndlem3

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfae 2444	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧
2		simpl 486	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑤) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧)
3	2	alimi 1813	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑤) → ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧)
4		nd3 10000	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧)
5	4	pm2.21d 121	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → (∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 → ∃𝑤∀𝑦(∃𝑤((𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑤) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑤)))
6	3, 5	syl5 34	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → (∀𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑤) → ∃𝑤∀𝑦(∃𝑤((𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑤) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑤)))
7	1, 6	alrimi 2211	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑧(∀𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑤) → ∃𝑤∀𝑦(∃𝑤((𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑤) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑤)))
8	7	axc4i 2330	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑦∀𝑧(∀𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑤) → ∃𝑤∀𝑦(∃𝑤((𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑤) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑤)))
9	8	19.8ad 2179	1 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∃𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(∀𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑤) → ∃𝑤∀𝑦(∃𝑤((𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑤) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑤)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 399  ∀wal 1536  ∃wex 1781

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2175  ax-13 2379  ax-ext 2770  ax-sep 5167  ax-nul 5174  ax-pr 5295  ax-reg 9040

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-or 845  df-tru 1541  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2070  df-clab 2777  df-cleq 2791  df-clel 2870  df-ral 3111  df-rex 3112  df-v 3443  df-dif 3884  df-un 3886  df-nul 4244  df-sn 4526  df-pr 4528

This theorem is referenced by:  axacndlem5  10022  axacnd  10023