Theorem bnj155 35509

Description: Technical lemma for bnj153 35510. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj155.1	⊢ (𝜓1 ↔ [𝑔 / 𝑓]𝜓′)
bnj155.2	⊢ (𝜓′ ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj155	⊢ (𝜓1 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → (𝑔‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑔‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑓   𝑅,𝑓   𝑓,𝑔,𝑖,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑦, 𝑔, 𝑖)   𝑅(𝑦, 𝑔, 𝑖)   𝜓′(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑔, 𝑖)   𝜓₁(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑔, 𝑖)

Proof of Theorem bnj155

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj155.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜓1 ↔ [𝑔 / 𝑓]𝜓′)
2		bnj155.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜓′ ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
3	2	sbcbii 3794	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑔 / 𝑓]𝜓′ ↔ [𝑔 / 𝑓]∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
4		vex 3454	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑔 ∈ V
5		fveq1 6884	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑔 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = (𝑔‘suc 𝑖))
6		fveq1 6884	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑔 → (𝑓‘𝑖) = (𝑔‘𝑖))
7	6	iuneq1d 4978	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑔 → ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑔‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))
8	5, 7	eqeq12d 2776	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑔 → ((𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) ↔ (𝑔‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑔‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
9	8	imbi2d 343	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑔 → ((suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → (𝑔‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑔‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))))
10	9	ralbidv 3185	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑔 → (∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → (𝑔‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑔‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))))
11	4, 10	sbcie 3779	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑔 / 𝑓]∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → (𝑔‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑔‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
12	1, 3, 11	3bitri 300	1 ⊢ (𝜓1 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → (𝑔‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑔‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2144  ∀wral 3076  [wsbc 3738  ∪ ciun 4950  suc csuc 6364  ‘cfv 6538  ωcom 7877  1_oc1o 8469   predc-bnj14 35319

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-ext 2732

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-tru 1572  df-ex 1812  df-sb 2099  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3739  df-ss 3896  df-uni 4867  df-iun 4952  df-br 5103  df-iota 6494  df-fv 6546

This theorem is used by:  bnj153  35510