P. 342 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 34101-34200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	bnj1198 34101	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜓′ ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜓′)
Theorem	bnj1209 34102*	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜒 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → ∃𝑥𝜃)
Theorem	bnj1211 34103	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓))
Theorem	bnj1213 34104	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜃 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	bnj1212 34105*	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}    &   ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜃 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	bnj1219 34106	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜁))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜃 → 𝜓)
Theorem	bnj1224 34107	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ¬ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜂)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → ¬ 𝜂)
Theorem	bnj1230 34108*	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	bnj1232 34109	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	bnj1235 34110	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)
Theorem	bnj1239 34111	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	bnj1238 34112	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	bnj1241 34113	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝐶 = 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵)
Theorem	bnj1247 34114	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃)
Theorem	bnj1254 34115	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏)
Theorem	bnj1262 34116	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵)
Theorem	bnj1266 34117	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜒 → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → ∃𝑥𝜓)
Theorem	bnj1265 34118*	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	bnj1275 34119	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))
Theorem	bnj1276 34120	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → ∀𝑥𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜃 → ∀𝑥𝜃)
Theorem	bnj1292 34121	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵
Theorem	bnj1293 34122	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶
Theorem	bnj1294 34123	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	bnj1299 34124	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	bnj1304 34125	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → ¬ 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝜑
Theorem	bnj1316 34126*	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶)
Theorem	bnj1317 34127*	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	bnj1322 34128	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐴)
Theorem	bnj1340 34129	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜓 → ∃𝑥𝜃)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∃𝑥𝜒)
Theorem	bnj1345 34130	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜃)
Theorem	bnj1350 34131*	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜒 → ∀𝑥𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))
Theorem	bnj1351 34132*	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	bnj1352 34133*	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	bnj1361 34134*	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)
Theorem	bnj1366 34135*	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 22-Dec-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑦𝜑 ∧ 𝐵 = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝐵 ∈ V)
Theorem	bnj1379 34136*	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 Fun 𝑓)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dom 𝑓 ∩ dom 𝑔)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓 ↾ 𝐷) = (𝑔 ↾ 𝐷)))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ∪ 𝐴 ∧ ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∈ ∪ 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝑓))    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝜃 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝑔))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → Fun ∪ 𝐴)
Theorem	bnj1383 34137*	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 Fun 𝑓)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dom 𝑓 ∩ dom 𝑔)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓 ↾ 𝐷) = (𝑔 ↾ 𝐷)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → Fun ∪ 𝐴)
Theorem	bnj1385 34138*	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 Fun 𝑓)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dom 𝑓 ∩ dom 𝑔)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓 ↾ 𝐷) = (𝑔 ↾ 𝐷)))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑓 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑′ ↔ ∀ℎ ∈ 𝐴 Fun ℎ)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (dom ℎ ∩ dom 𝑔)    &   ⊢ (𝜓′ ↔ (𝜑′ ∧ ∀ℎ ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 (ℎ ↾ 𝐸) = (𝑔 ↾ 𝐸)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → Fun ∪ 𝐴)
Theorem	bnj1386 34139*	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 Fun 𝑓)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (dom 𝑓 ∩ dom 𝑔)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓 ↾ 𝐷) = (𝑔 ↾ 𝐷)))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑓 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → Fun ∪ 𝐴)
Theorem	bnj1397 34140	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	bnj1400 34141*	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ dom ∪ 𝐴 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 dom 𝑥
Theorem	bnj1405 34142*	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	bnj1422 34143	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 Fn 𝐵)
Theorem	bnj1424 34144	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐷 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐶))
Theorem	bnj1436 34145	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)
Theorem	bnj1441 34146*	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) Add disjoint variable condition to avoid ax-13 2370. See bnj1441g 34147 for a less restrictive version requiring more axioms. (Revised by Gino Giotto, 20-Jan-2024.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} → ∀𝑦 𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑})
Theorem	bnj1441g 34147*	First-order logic and set theory. See bnj1441 34146 for a version with more disjoint variable conditions, but not requiring ax-13 2370. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑦 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} → ∀𝑦 𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑})
Theorem	bnj1454 34148	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ V → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ [𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜑))
Theorem	bnj1459 34149*	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)
Theorem	bnj1464 34150*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	bnj1465 34151*	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → ∃𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	bnj1468 34152*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	bnj1476 34153	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝜑}    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝐷 = ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	bnj1502 34154	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⊆ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐺‘𝐴))
Theorem	bnj1503 34155	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⊆ 𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ dom 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐴) = (𝐺 ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	bnj1517 34156	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓)
Theorem	bnj1521 34157	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜒 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → ∀𝑥𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → ∃𝑥𝜃)
Theorem	bnj1533 34158	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜃 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐸}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜃 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 = 𝐸)
Theorem	bnj1534 34159*	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑥)}    &   ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐹 → ∀𝑥 𝑤 ∈ 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑧) ≠ (𝐻‘𝑧)}
Theorem	bnj1536 34160*	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) = (𝐺 ↾ 𝐵))
Theorem	bnj1538 34161	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)
Theorem	bnj1541 34162	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ ¬ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	bnj1542 34163*	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ≠ 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ 𝐹 → ∀𝑥 𝑤 ∈ 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) ≠ (𝐺‘𝑥))
21.4.2  Well founded induction and recursion
Theorem	bnj110 34164*	Well-founded induction restricted to a set (𝐴 ∈ V). The proof has been taken from Chapter 4 of Don Monk's notes on Set Theory. See http://euclid.colorado.edu/~monkd/setth.pdf. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 → 𝜑)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	bnj157 34165*	Well-founded induction restricted to a set (𝐴 ∈ V). The proof has been taken from Chapter 4 of Don Monk's notes on Set Theory. See http://euclid.colorado.edu/~monkd/setth.pdf. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝑅 Fr 𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 → 𝜑) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	bnj66 34166*	Technical lemma for bnj60 34368. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 → Rel 𝑔)
Theorem	bnj91 34167*	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝑍 / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))
Theorem	bnj92 34168*	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝑍 / 𝑛]𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑍 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
Theorem	bnj93 34169*	Technical lemma for bnj97 34172. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ V)
Theorem	bnj95 34170	Technical lemma for bnj124 34177. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨∅, pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V
Theorem	bnj96 34171*	Technical lemma for bnj150 34182. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-May-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨∅, pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → dom 𝐹 = 1o)
Theorem	bnj97 34172*	Technical lemma for bnj150 34182. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨∅, pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘∅) = pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))
Theorem	bnj98 34173	Technical lemma for bnj150 34182. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))
Theorem	bnj106 34174*	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ([𝐹 / 𝑓][1o / 𝑛]𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
Theorem	bnj118 34175*	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑′ ↔ [1o / 𝑛]𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑′ ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))
Theorem	bnj121 34176*	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜁 ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))    &   ⊢ (𝜁′ ↔ [1o / 𝑛]𝜁)    &   ⊢ (𝜑′ ↔ [1o / 𝑛]𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜓′ ↔ [1o / 𝑛]𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜁′ ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑓 Fn 1o ∧ 𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′)))
Theorem	bnj124 34177*	Technical lemma for bnj150 34182. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 22-Dec-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨∅, pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}    &   ⊢ (𝜑″ ↔ [𝐹 / 𝑓]𝜑′)    &   ⊢ (𝜓″ ↔ [𝐹 / 𝑓]𝜓′)    &   ⊢ (𝜁″ ↔ [𝐹 / 𝑓]𝜁′)    &   ⊢ (𝜁′ ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑓 Fn 1o ∧ 𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜁″ ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹 Fn 1o ∧ 𝜑″ ∧ 𝜓″)))
Theorem	bnj125 34178*	Technical lemma for bnj150 34182. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑′ ↔ [1o / 𝑛]𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑″ ↔ [𝐹 / 𝑓]𝜑′)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨∅, pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑″ ↔ (𝐹‘∅) = pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))
Theorem	bnj126 34179*	Technical lemma for bnj150 34182. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    &   ⊢ (𝜓′ ↔ [1o / 𝑛]𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜓″ ↔ [𝐹 / 𝑓]𝜓′)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨∅, pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓″ ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
Theorem	bnj130 34180*	Technical lemma for bnj151 34183. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜃 ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃!𝑓(𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑′ ↔ [1o / 𝑛]𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜓′ ↔ [1o / 𝑛]𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜃′ ↔ [1o / 𝑛]𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜃′ ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃!𝑓(𝑓 Fn 1o ∧ 𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′)))
Theorem	bnj149 34181*	Technical lemma for bnj151 34183. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 22-Dec-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜃1 ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃*𝑓(𝑓 Fn 1o ∧ 𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′)))    &   ⊢ (𝜁0 ↔ (𝑓 Fn 1o ∧ 𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′))    &   ⊢ (𝜁1 ↔ [𝑔 / 𝑓]𝜁0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑1 ↔ [𝑔 / 𝑓]𝜑′)    &   ⊢ (𝜓1 ↔ [𝑔 / 𝑓]𝜓′)    &   ⊢ (𝜑′ ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜃1
Theorem	bnj150 34182*	Technical lemma for bnj151 34183. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    &   ⊢ (𝜁 ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑′ ↔ [1o / 𝑛]𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜓′ ↔ [1o / 𝑛]𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜃0 ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn 1o ∧ 𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′)))    &   ⊢ (𝜁′ ↔ [1o / 𝑛]𝜁)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨∅, pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}    &   ⊢ (𝜑″ ↔ [𝐹 / 𝑓]𝜑′)    &   ⊢ (𝜓″ ↔ [𝐹 / 𝑓]𝜓′)    &   ⊢ (𝜁″ ↔ [𝐹 / 𝑓]𝜁′)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜃0
Theorem	bnj151 34183*	Technical lemma for bnj153 34186. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})    &   ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃!𝑓(𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ ∀𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 (𝑚 E 𝑛 → [𝑚 / 𝑛]𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜁 ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑′ ↔ [1o / 𝑛]𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜓′ ↔ [1o / 𝑛]𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜃′ ↔ [1o / 𝑛]𝜃)    &   ⊢ (𝜃0 ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn 1o ∧ 𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′)))    &   ⊢ (𝜃1 ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃*𝑓(𝑓 Fn 1o ∧ 𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′)))    &   ⊢ (𝜁′ ↔ [1o / 𝑛]𝜁)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨∅, pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩}    &   ⊢ (𝜑″ ↔ [𝐹 / 𝑓]𝜑′)    &   ⊢ (𝜓″ ↔ [𝐹 / 𝑓]𝜓′)    &   ⊢ (𝜁″ ↔ [𝐹 / 𝑓]𝜁′)    &   ⊢ (𝜁0 ↔ (𝑓 Fn 1o ∧ 𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′))    &   ⊢ (𝜁1 ↔ [𝑔 / 𝑓]𝜁0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑1 ↔ [𝑔 / 𝑓]𝜑′)    &   ⊢ (𝜓1 ↔ [𝑔 / 𝑓]𝜓′)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑛 = 1o → ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜃))
Theorem	bnj154 34184*	Technical lemma for bnj153 34186. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑1 ↔ [𝑔 / 𝑓]𝜑′)    &   ⊢ (𝜑′ ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑1 ↔ (𝑔‘∅) = pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))
Theorem	bnj155 34185*	Technical lemma for bnj153 34186. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜓1 ↔ [𝑔 / 𝑓]𝜓′)    &   ⊢ (𝜓′ ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓1 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → (𝑔‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑔‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
Theorem	bnj153 34186*	Technical lemma for bnj852 34227. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})    &   ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃!𝑓(𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ ∀𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 (𝑚 E 𝑛 → [𝑚 / 𝑛]𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑛 = 1o → ((𝑛 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜃))
Theorem	bnj207 34187*	Technical lemma for bnj852 34227. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜒 ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃!𝑓(𝑓 Fn 𝑛 ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑′ ↔ [𝑀 / 𝑛]𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜓′ ↔ [𝑀 / 𝑛]𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜒′ ↔ [𝑀 / 𝑛]𝜒)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒′ ↔ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃!𝑓(𝑓 Fn 𝑀 ∧ 𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′)))
Theorem	bnj213 34188	First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝐴
Theorem	bnj222 34189*	Technical lemma for bnj229 34190. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑁 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑚 ∈ ω (suc 𝑚 ∈ 𝑁 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑚) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑚) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
Theorem	bnj229 34190*	Technical lemma for bnj517 34191. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑁 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 ∧ (suc 𝑚 = 𝑛 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝜓)) → (𝐹‘𝑛) ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	bnj517 34191*	Technical lemma for bnj518 34192. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 22-Dec-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝐹‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑁 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ∀𝑛 ∈ 𝑁 (𝐹‘𝑛) ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	bnj518 34192*	Technical lemma for bnj852 34227. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝑛))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏) → ∀𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ V)
Theorem	bnj523 34193*	Technical lemma for bnj852 34227. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝐹‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑′ ↔ [𝑀 / 𝑛]𝜑)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑′ ↔ (𝐹‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅))
Theorem	bnj526 34194*	Technical lemma for bnj852 34227. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑″ ↔ [𝐺 / 𝑓]𝜑)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑″ ↔ (𝐺‘∅) = pred(𝑋, 𝐴, 𝑅))
Theorem	bnj528 34195	Technical lemma for bnj852 34227. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩})    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ V
Theorem	bnj535 34196*	Technical lemma for bnj852 34227. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑′ ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜓′ ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′ ∧ 𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝑚))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝑛 = (𝑚 ∪ {𝑚}) ∧ 𝑓 Fn 𝑚) → 𝐺 Fn 𝑛)
Theorem	bnj539 34197*	Technical lemma for bnj852 34227. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    &   ⊢ (𝜓′ ↔ [𝑀 / 𝑛]𝜓)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓′ ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑀 → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
Theorem	bnj540 34198*	Technical lemma for bnj852 34227. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑁 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    &   ⊢ (𝜓″ ↔ [𝐺 / 𝑓]𝜓)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓″ ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑁 → (𝐺‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐺‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
Theorem	bnj543 34199*	Technical lemma for bnj852 34227. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑′ ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜓′ ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 Fn 𝑚 ∧ 𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′))    &   ⊢ (𝜎 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝑚))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜎) → 𝐺 Fn 𝑛)
Theorem	bnj544 34200*	Technical lemma for bnj852 34227. This lemma may no longer be used or have become an indirect lemma of the theorem in question (i.e. a lemma of a lemma... of the theorem). (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑′ ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜓′ ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑚 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (ω ∖ {∅})    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑓 ∪ {⟨𝑚, ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑝) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ (𝑓 Fn 𝑚 ∧ 𝜑′ ∧ 𝜓′))    &   ⊢ (𝜎 ↔ (𝑚 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑛 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝑚))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝜏 ∧ 𝜎) → 𝐺 Fn 𝑛)