Theorem bnj92 35263

Description: First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj92.1	⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
bnj92.2	⊢ 𝑍 ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj92	⊢ ([𝑍 / 𝑛]𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑍 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑛   𝑅,𝑛   𝑖,𝑍   𝑓,𝑛   𝑖,𝑛   𝑦,𝑛

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑖, 𝑛)   𝐴(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑖)   𝑅(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑖)   𝑍(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑛)

Proof of Theorem bnj92

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj92.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
2	1	sbcbii 3803	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑍 / 𝑛]𝜓 ↔ [𝑍 / 𝑛]∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
3		bnj92.2	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ V
4	3	bnj538 35142	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑍 / 𝑛]∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω [𝑍 / 𝑛](suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
5		sbcimg 3795	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑍 ∈ V → ([𝑍 / 𝑛](suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ ([𝑍 / 𝑛]suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → [𝑍 / 𝑛](𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))))
6	3, 5	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 ⊢ ([𝑍 / 𝑛](suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ ([𝑍 / 𝑛]suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → [𝑍 / 𝑛](𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
7		sbcel2gv 3813	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑍 ∈ V → ([𝑍 / 𝑛]suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ↔ suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑍))
8	3, 7	ax-mp 5	. . . . 5 ⊢ ([𝑍 / 𝑛]suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 ↔ suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑍)
9	3	bnj525 35140	. . . . 5 ⊢ ([𝑍 / 𝑛](𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) ↔ (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))
10	8, 9	imbi12i 353	. . . 4 ⊢ (([𝑍 / 𝑛]suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → [𝑍 / 𝑛](𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑍 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
11	6, 10	bitri 278	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑍 / 𝑛](suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑍 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
12	11	ralbii 3114	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑖 ∈ ω [𝑍 / 𝑛](suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑍 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
13	2, 4, 12	3bitri 300	1 ⊢ ([𝑍 / 𝑛]𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑍 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146  ∀wral 3082  Vcvv 3458  [wsbc 3747  ∪ ciun 4959  suc csuc 6366  ‘cfv 6540  ωcom 7864   predc-bnj14 35090

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2738

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-tru 1573  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2745  df-cleq 2758  df-clel 2841  df-nfc 2915  df-ral 3083  df-v 3460  df-sbc 3748

This theorem is used by:  bnj106  35269  bnj153  35281