Home | Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 344 of 460) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-28845) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(28846-30368) |
Users' Mathboxes
(30369-45946) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | dnibnd 34301* | The "distance to nearest integer" function is 1-Lipschitz continuous, i.e., is a short map. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 4-Apr-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘((⌊‘(𝑥 + (1 / 2))) − 𝑥))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘((𝑇‘𝐵) − (𝑇‘𝐴))) ≤ (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | dnicn 34302 | The "distance to nearest integer" function is continuous. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 4-Apr-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘((⌊‘(𝑥 + (1 / 2))) − 𝑥))) ⇒ ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ (ℝ–cn→ℝ) | ||
Theorem | knoppcnlem1 34303* | Lemma for knoppcn 34314. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 4-Apr-2021.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐶↑𝑛) · (𝑇‘(((2 · 𝑁)↑𝑛) · 𝑦))))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑀) = ((𝐶↑𝑀) · (𝑇‘(((2 · 𝑁)↑𝑀) · 𝐴)))) | ||
Theorem | knoppcnlem2 34304* | Lemma for knoppcn 34314. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 4-Apr-2021.) (Revised by Asger C. Ipsen, 5-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘((⌊‘(𝑥 + (1 / 2))) − 𝑥))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶↑𝑀) · (𝑇‘(((2 · 𝑁)↑𝑀) · 𝐴))) ∈ ℝ) | ||
Theorem | knoppcnlem3 34305* | Lemma for knoppcn 34314. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 4-Apr-2021.) (Revised by Asger C. Ipsen, 5-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘((⌊‘(𝑥 + (1 / 2))) − 𝑥))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐶↑𝑛) · (𝑇‘(((2 · 𝑁)↑𝑛) · 𝑦))))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑀) ∈ ℝ) | ||
Theorem | knoppcnlem4 34306* | Lemma for knoppcn 34314. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 4-Apr-2021.) (Revised by Asger C. Ipsen, 5-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘((⌊‘(𝑥 + (1 / 2))) − 𝑥))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐶↑𝑛) · (𝑇‘(((2 · 𝑁)↑𝑛) · 𝑦))))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑀)) ≤ ((𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((abs‘𝐶)↑𝑚))‘𝑀)) | ||
Theorem | knoppcnlem5 34307* | Lemma for knoppcn 34314. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 4-Apr-2021.) (Revised by Asger C. Ipsen, 5-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘((⌊‘(𝑥 + (1 / 2))) − 𝑥))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐶↑𝑛) · (𝑇‘(((2 · 𝑁)↑𝑛) · 𝑦))))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑧 ∈ ℝ ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑧)‘𝑚))):ℕ0⟶(ℂ ↑m ℝ)) | ||
Theorem | knoppcnlem6 34308* | Lemma for knoppcn 34314. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 4-Apr-2021.) (Revised by Asger C. Ipsen, 5-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘((⌊‘(𝑥 + (1 / 2))) − 𝑥))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐶↑𝑛) · (𝑇‘(((2 · 𝑁)↑𝑛) · 𝑦))))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐶) < 1) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → seq0( ∘f + , (𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑧 ∈ ℝ ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑧)‘𝑚)))) ∈ dom (⇝𝑢‘ℝ)) | ||
Theorem | knoppcnlem7 34309* | Lemma for knoppcn 34314. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 4-Apr-2021.) (Revised by Asger C. Ipsen, 5-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘((⌊‘(𝑥 + (1 / 2))) − 𝑥))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐶↑𝑛) · (𝑇‘(((2 · 𝑁)↑𝑛) · 𝑦))))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq0( ∘f + , (𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑧 ∈ ℝ ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑧)‘𝑚))))‘𝑀) = (𝑤 ∈ ℝ ↦ (seq0( + , (𝐹‘𝑤))‘𝑀))) | ||
Theorem | knoppcnlem8 34310* | Lemma for knoppcn 34314. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 4-Apr-2021.) (Revised by Asger C. Ipsen, 5-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘((⌊‘(𝑥 + (1 / 2))) − 𝑥))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐶↑𝑛) · (𝑇‘(((2 · 𝑁)↑𝑛) · 𝑦))))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → seq0( ∘f + , (𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑧 ∈ ℝ ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑧)‘𝑚)))):ℕ0⟶(ℂ ↑m ℝ)) | ||
Theorem | knoppcnlem9 34311* | Lemma for knoppcn 34314. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 4-Apr-2021.) (Revised by Asger C. Ipsen, 5-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘((⌊‘(𝑥 + (1 / 2))) − 𝑥))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐶↑𝑛) · (𝑇‘(((2 · 𝑁)↑𝑛) · 𝑦))))) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑤 ∈ ℝ ↦ Σ𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ((𝐹‘𝑤)‘𝑖)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐶) < 1) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → seq0( ∘f + , (𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑧 ∈ ℝ ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑧)‘𝑚))))(⇝𝑢‘ℝ)𝑊) | ||
Theorem | knoppcnlem10 34312* | Lemma for knoppcn 34314. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 4-Apr-2021.) (Revised by Asger C. Ipsen, 5-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘((⌊‘(𝑥 + (1 / 2))) − 𝑥))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐶↑𝑛) · (𝑇‘(((2 · 𝑁)↑𝑛) · 𝑦))))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℕ0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 ∈ ℝ ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑧)‘𝑀)) ∈ ((topGen‘ran (,)) Cn (TopOpen‘ℂfld))) | ||
Theorem | knoppcnlem11 34313* | Lemma for knoppcn 34314. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 4-Apr-2021.) (Revised by Asger C. Ipsen, 5-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘((⌊‘(𝑥 + (1 / 2))) − 𝑥))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐶↑𝑛) · (𝑇‘(((2 · 𝑁)↑𝑛) · 𝑦))))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → seq0( ∘f + , (𝑚 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (𝑧 ∈ ℝ ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑧)‘𝑚)))):ℕ0⟶(ℝ–cn→ℂ)) | ||
Theorem | knoppcn 34314* | The continuous nowhere differentiable function 𝑊 ( Knopp, K. (1918). Math. Z. 2, 1-26 ) is, in fact, continuous. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 4-Apr-2021.) (Revised by Asger C. Ipsen, 5-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘((⌊‘(𝑥 + (1 / 2))) − 𝑥))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐶↑𝑛) · (𝑇‘(((2 · 𝑁)↑𝑛) · 𝑦))))) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑤 ∈ ℝ ↦ Σ𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ((𝐹‘𝑤)‘𝑖)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐶) < 1) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ (ℝ–cn→ℂ)) | ||
Theorem | knoppcld 34315* | Closure theorem for Knopp's function. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 26-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘((⌊‘(𝑥 + (1 / 2))) − 𝑥))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐶↑𝑛) · (𝑇‘(((2 · 𝑁)↑𝑛) · 𝑦))))) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑤 ∈ ℝ ↦ Σ𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ((𝐹‘𝑤)‘𝑖)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐶) < 1) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑊‘𝐴) ∈ ℂ) | ||
Theorem | unblimceq0lem 34316* | Lemma for unblimceq0 34317. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 12-May-2021.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑆⟶ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑏 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑑 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ((abs‘(𝑥 − 𝐴)) < 𝑑 ∧ 𝑏 ≤ (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑐 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑑 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑦 ≠ 𝐴 ∧ (abs‘(𝑦 − 𝐴)) < 𝑑 ∧ 𝑐 ≤ (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑦)))) | ||
Theorem | unblimceq0 34317* | If 𝐹 is unbounded near 𝐴 it has no limit at 𝐴. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 12-May-2021.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑆⟶ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑏 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑑 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ((abs‘(𝑥 − 𝐴)) < 𝑑 ∧ 𝑏 ≤ (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 limℂ 𝐴) = ∅) | ||
Theorem | unbdqndv1 34318* | If the difference quotient (((𝐹‘𝑧) − (𝐹‘𝐴)) / (𝑧 − 𝐴)) is unbounded near 𝐴 then 𝐹 is not differentiable at 𝐴. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 12-May-2021.) |
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑧 ∈ (𝑋 ∖ {𝐴}) ↦ (((𝐹‘𝑧) − (𝐹‘𝐴)) / (𝑧 − 𝐴))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ⊆ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑋⟶ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑏 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑑 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝑋 ∖ {𝐴})((abs‘(𝑥 − 𝐴)) < 𝑑 ∧ 𝑏 ≤ (abs‘(𝐺‘𝑥)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ dom (𝑆 D 𝐹)) | ||
Theorem | unbdqndv2lem1 34319 | Lemma for unbdqndv2 34321. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 12-May-2021.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ≠ 0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (2 · 𝐸) ≤ (abs‘((𝐴 − 𝐵) / 𝐷))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐸 · (abs‘𝐷)) ≤ (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐶)) ∨ (𝐸 · (abs‘𝐷)) ≤ (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶)))) | ||
Theorem | unbdqndv2lem2 34320* | Lemma for unbdqndv2 34321. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 12-May-2021.) |
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑧 ∈ (𝑋 ∖ {𝐴}) ↦ (((𝐹‘𝑧) − (𝐹‘𝐴)) / (𝑧 − 𝐴))) & ⊢ 𝑊 = if((𝐵 · (𝑉 − 𝑈)) ≤ (abs‘((𝐹‘𝑈) − (𝐹‘𝐴))), 𝑈, 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑋⟶ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ≠ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ≤ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑉 − 𝑈) < 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (2 · 𝐵) ≤ ((abs‘((𝐹‘𝑉) − (𝐹‘𝑈))) / (𝑉 − 𝑈))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑊 ∈ (𝑋 ∖ {𝐴}) ∧ ((abs‘(𝑊 − 𝐴)) < 𝐷 ∧ 𝐵 ≤ (abs‘(𝐺‘𝑊))))) | ||
Theorem | unbdqndv2 34321* | Variant of unbdqndv1 34318 with the hypothesis that (((𝐹‘𝑦) − (𝐹‘𝑥)) / (𝑦 − 𝑥)) is unbounded where 𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 and 𝐴 ≤ 𝑦. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 12-May-2021.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑋⟶ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑏 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑑 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ((𝑥 ≤ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝑦) ∧ ((𝑦 − 𝑥) < 𝑑 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑏 ≤ ((abs‘((𝐹‘𝑦) − (𝐹‘𝑥))) / (𝑦 − 𝑥)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ dom (ℝ D 𝐹)) | ||
Theorem | knoppndvlem1 34322 | Lemma for knoppndv 34344. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 15-Jun-2021.) (Revised by Asger C. Ipsen, 5-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((((2 · 𝑁)↑-𝐽) / 2) · 𝑀) ∈ ℝ) | ||
Theorem | knoppndvlem2 34323 | Lemma for knoppndv 34344. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 15-Jun-2021.) (Revised by Asger C. Ipsen, 5-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 < 𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (((2 · 𝑁)↑𝐼) · ((((2 · 𝑁)↑-𝐽) / 2) · 𝑀)) ∈ ℤ) | ||
Theorem | knoppndvlem3 34324 | Lemma for knoppndv 34344. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 15-Jun-2021.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (-1(,)1)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ (abs‘𝐶) < 1)) | ||
Theorem | knoppndvlem4 34325* | Lemma for knoppndv 34344. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 15-Jun-2021.) (Revised by Asger C. Ipsen, 5-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘((⌊‘(𝑥 + (1 / 2))) − 𝑥))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐶↑𝑛) · (𝑇‘(((2 · 𝑁)↑𝑛) · 𝑦))))) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑤 ∈ ℝ ↦ Σ𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ((𝐹‘𝑤)‘𝑖)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (-1(,)1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → seq0( + , (𝐹‘𝐴)) ⇝ (𝑊‘𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | knoppndvlem5 34326* | Lemma for knoppndv 34344. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 15-Jun-2021.) (Revised by Asger C. Ipsen, 5-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘((⌊‘(𝑥 + (1 / 2))) − 𝑥))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐶↑𝑛) · (𝑇‘(((2 · 𝑁)↑𝑛) · 𝑦))))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑖 ∈ (0...𝐽)((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑖) ∈ ℝ) | ||
Theorem | knoppndvlem6 34327* | Lemma for knoppndv 34344. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 15-Jun-2021.) (Revised by Asger C. Ipsen, 5-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘((⌊‘(𝑥 + (1 / 2))) − 𝑥))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐶↑𝑛) · (𝑇‘(((2 · 𝑁)↑𝑛) · 𝑦))))) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑤 ∈ ℝ ↦ Σ𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ((𝐹‘𝑤)‘𝑖)) & ⊢ 𝐴 = ((((2 · 𝑁)↑-𝐽) / 2) · 𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (-1(,)1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑊‘𝐴) = Σ𝑖 ∈ (0...𝐽)((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑖)) | ||
Theorem | knoppndvlem7 34328* | Lemma for knoppndv 34344. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 15-Jun-2021.) (Revised by Asger C. Ipsen, 5-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘((⌊‘(𝑥 + (1 / 2))) − 𝑥))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐶↑𝑛) · (𝑇‘(((2 · 𝑁)↑𝑛) · 𝑦))))) & ⊢ 𝐴 = ((((2 · 𝑁)↑-𝐽) / 2) · 𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝐽) = ((𝐶↑𝐽) · (𝑇‘(𝑀 / 2)))) | ||
Theorem | knoppndvlem8 34329* | Lemma for knoppndv 34344. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 15-Jun-2021.) (Revised by Asger C. Ipsen, 5-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘((⌊‘(𝑥 + (1 / 2))) − 𝑥))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐶↑𝑛) · (𝑇‘(((2 · 𝑁)↑𝑛) · 𝑦))))) & ⊢ 𝐴 = ((((2 · 𝑁)↑-𝐽) / 2) · 𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (-1(,)1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 2 ∥ 𝑀) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝐽) = 0) | ||
Theorem | knoppndvlem9 34330* | Lemma for knoppndv 34344. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 15-Jun-2021.) (Revised by Asger C. Ipsen, 5-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘((⌊‘(𝑥 + (1 / 2))) − 𝑥))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐶↑𝑛) · (𝑇‘(((2 · 𝑁)↑𝑛) · 𝑦))))) & ⊢ 𝐴 = ((((2 · 𝑁)↑-𝐽) / 2) · 𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (-1(,)1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑀) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝐽) = ((𝐶↑𝐽) / 2)) | ||
Theorem | knoppndvlem10 34331* | Lemma for knoppndv 34344. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 15-Jun-2021.) (Revised by Asger C. Ipsen, 5-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘((⌊‘(𝑥 + (1 / 2))) − 𝑥))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐶↑𝑛) · (𝑇‘(((2 · 𝑁)↑𝑛) · 𝑦))))) & ⊢ 𝐴 = ((((2 · 𝑁)↑-𝐽) / 2) · 𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐵 = ((((2 · 𝑁)↑-𝐽) / 2) · (𝑀 + 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (-1(,)1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(((𝐹‘𝐵)‘𝐽) − ((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝐽))) = (((abs‘𝐶)↑𝐽) / 2)) | ||
Theorem | knoppndvlem11 34332* | Lemma for knoppndv 34344. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 28-Jun-2021.) (Revised by Asger C. Ipsen, 5-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘((⌊‘(𝑥 + (1 / 2))) − 𝑥))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐶↑𝑛) · (𝑇‘(((2 · 𝑁)↑𝑛) · 𝑦))))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (-1(,)1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(Σ𝑖 ∈ (0...(𝐽 − 1))((𝐹‘𝐵)‘𝑖) − Σ𝑖 ∈ (0...(𝐽 − 1))((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑖))) ≤ ((abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) · Σ𝑖 ∈ (0...(𝐽 − 1))(((2 · 𝑁) · (abs‘𝐶))↑𝑖))) | ||
Theorem | knoppndvlem12 34333 | Lemma for knoppndv 34344. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 29-Jun-2021.) (Revised by Asger C. Ipsen, 5-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (-1(,)1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 < (𝑁 · (abs‘𝐶))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (((2 · 𝑁) · (abs‘𝐶)) ≠ 1 ∧ 1 < (((2 · 𝑁) · (abs‘𝐶)) − 1))) | ||
Theorem | knoppndvlem13 34334 | Lemma for knoppndv 34344. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 1-Jul-2021.) (Revised by Asger C. Ipsen, 5-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (-1(,)1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 < (𝑁 · (abs‘𝐶))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 0) | ||
Theorem | knoppndvlem14 34335* | Lemma for knoppndv 34344. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 1-Jul-2021.) (Revised by Asger C. Ipsen, 7-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘((⌊‘(𝑥 + (1 / 2))) − 𝑥))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐶↑𝑛) · (𝑇‘(((2 · 𝑁)↑𝑛) · 𝑦))))) & ⊢ 𝐴 = ((((2 · 𝑁)↑-𝐽) / 2) · 𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐵 = ((((2 · 𝑁)↑-𝐽) / 2) · (𝑀 + 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (-1(,)1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 < (𝑁 · (abs‘𝐶))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(Σ𝑖 ∈ (0...(𝐽 − 1))((𝐹‘𝐵)‘𝑖) − Σ𝑖 ∈ (0...(𝐽 − 1))((𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝑖))) ≤ ((((abs‘𝐶)↑𝐽) / 2) · (1 / (((2 · 𝑁) · (abs‘𝐶)) − 1)))) | ||
Theorem | knoppndvlem15 34336* | Lemma for knoppndv 34344. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 6-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘((⌊‘(𝑥 + (1 / 2))) − 𝑥))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐶↑𝑛) · (𝑇‘(((2 · 𝑁)↑𝑛) · 𝑦))))) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑤 ∈ ℝ ↦ Σ𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ((𝐹‘𝑤)‘𝑖)) & ⊢ 𝐴 = ((((2 · 𝑁)↑-𝐽) / 2) · 𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐵 = ((((2 · 𝑁)↑-𝐽) / 2) · (𝑀 + 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (-1(,)1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 < (𝑁 · (abs‘𝐶))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((((abs‘𝐶)↑𝐽) / 2) · (1 − (1 / (((2 · 𝑁) · (abs‘𝐶)) − 1)))) ≤ (abs‘((𝑊‘𝐵) − (𝑊‘𝐴)))) | ||
Theorem | knoppndvlem16 34337 | Lemma for knoppndv 34344. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 19-Jul-2021.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = ((((2 · 𝑁)↑-𝐽) / 2) · 𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐵 = ((((2 · 𝑁)↑-𝐽) / 2) · (𝑀 + 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 − 𝐴) = (((2 · 𝑁)↑-𝐽) / 2)) | ||
Theorem | knoppndvlem17 34338* | Lemma for knoppndv 34344. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 12-Aug-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘((⌊‘(𝑥 + (1 / 2))) − 𝑥))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐶↑𝑛) · (𝑇‘(((2 · 𝑁)↑𝑛) · 𝑦))))) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑤 ∈ ℝ ↦ Σ𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ((𝐹‘𝑤)‘𝑖)) & ⊢ 𝐴 = ((((2 · 𝑁)↑-𝐽) / 2) · 𝑀) & ⊢ 𝐵 = ((((2 · 𝑁)↑-𝐽) / 2) · (𝑀 + 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (-1(,)1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 < (𝑁 · (abs‘𝐶))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((((2 · 𝑁) · (abs‘𝐶))↑𝐽) · (1 − (1 / (((2 · 𝑁) · (abs‘𝐶)) − 1)))) ≤ ((abs‘((𝑊‘𝐵) − (𝑊‘𝐴))) / (𝐵 − 𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | knoppndvlem18 34339* | Lemma for knoppndv 34344. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 14-Aug-2021.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (-1(,)1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 < (𝑁 · (abs‘𝐶))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ ℕ0 ((((2 · 𝑁)↑-𝑗) / 2) < 𝐷 ∧ 𝐸 ≤ ((((2 · 𝑁) · (abs‘𝐶))↑𝑗) · 𝐺))) | ||
Theorem | knoppndvlem19 34340* | Lemma for knoppndv 34344. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 17-Aug-2021.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = ((((2 · 𝑁)↑-𝐽) / 2) · 𝑚) & ⊢ 𝐵 = ((((2 · 𝑁)↑-𝐽) / 2) · (𝑚 + 1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑚 ∈ ℤ (𝐴 ≤ 𝐻 ∧ 𝐻 ≤ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | knoppndvlem20 34341 | Lemma for knoppndv 34344. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 18-Aug-2021.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (-1(,)1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 < (𝑁 · (abs‘𝐶))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (1 − (1 / (((2 · 𝑁) · (abs‘𝐶)) − 1))) ∈ ℝ+) | ||
Theorem | knoppndvlem21 34342* | Lemma for knoppndv 34344. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 18-Aug-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘((⌊‘(𝑥 + (1 / 2))) − 𝑥))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐶↑𝑛) · (𝑇‘(((2 · 𝑁)↑𝑛) · 𝑦))))) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑤 ∈ ℝ ↦ Σ𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ((𝐹‘𝑤)‘𝑖)) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (1 − (1 / (((2 · 𝑁) · (abs‘𝐶)) − 1))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (-1(,)1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ ℕ0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 < (𝑁 · (abs‘𝐶))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (((2 · 𝑁)↑-𝐽) / 2) < 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ≤ ((((2 · 𝑁) · (abs‘𝐶))↑𝐽) · 𝐺)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℝ ((𝑎 ≤ 𝐻 ∧ 𝐻 ≤ 𝑏) ∧ ((𝑏 − 𝑎) < 𝐷 ∧ 𝑎 ≠ 𝑏) ∧ 𝐸 ≤ ((abs‘((𝑊‘𝑏) − (𝑊‘𝑎))) / (𝑏 − 𝑎)))) | ||
Theorem | knoppndvlem22 34343* | Lemma for knoppndv 34344. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 19-Aug-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘((⌊‘(𝑥 + (1 / 2))) − 𝑥))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐶↑𝑛) · (𝑇‘(((2 · 𝑁)↑𝑛) · 𝑦))))) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑤 ∈ ℝ ↦ Σ𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ((𝐹‘𝑤)‘𝑖)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (-1(,)1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℝ+) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 < (𝑁 · (abs‘𝐶))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℝ ((𝑎 ≤ 𝐻 ∧ 𝐻 ≤ 𝑏) ∧ ((𝑏 − 𝑎) < 𝐷 ∧ 𝑎 ≠ 𝑏) ∧ 𝐸 ≤ ((abs‘((𝑊‘𝑏) − (𝑊‘𝑎))) / (𝑏 − 𝑎)))) | ||
Theorem | knoppndv 34344* | The continuous nowhere differentiable function 𝑊 ( Knopp, K. (1918). Math. Z. 2, 1-26 ) is, in fact, nowhere differentiable. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 19-Aug-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘((⌊‘(𝑥 + (1 / 2))) − 𝑥))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐶↑𝑛) · (𝑇‘(((2 · 𝑁)↑𝑛) · 𝑦))))) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑤 ∈ ℝ ↦ Σ𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ((𝐹‘𝑤)‘𝑖)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (-1(,)1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 < (𝑁 · (abs‘𝐶))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (ℝ D 𝑊) = ∅) | ||
Theorem | knoppf 34345* | Knopp's function is a function. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 25-Aug-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘((⌊‘(𝑥 + (1 / 2))) − 𝑥))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐶↑𝑛) · (𝑇‘(((2 · 𝑁)↑𝑛) · 𝑦))))) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑤 ∈ ℝ ↦ Σ𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ((𝐹‘𝑤)‘𝑖)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (-1(,)1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊:ℝ⟶ℝ) | ||
Theorem | knoppcn2 34346* | Variant of knoppcn 34314 with different codomain. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 25-Aug-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘((⌊‘(𝑥 + (1 / 2))) − 𝑥))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ((𝐶↑𝑛) · (𝑇‘(((2 · 𝑁)↑𝑛) · 𝑦))))) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑤 ∈ ℝ ↦ Σ𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ((𝐹‘𝑤)‘𝑖)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (-1(,)1)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ (ℝ–cn→ℝ)) | ||
Theorem | cnndvlem1 34347* | Lemma for cnndv 34349. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 25-Aug-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘((⌊‘(𝑥 + (1 / 2))) − 𝑥))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (((1 / 2)↑𝑛) · (𝑇‘(((2 · 3)↑𝑛) · 𝑦))))) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑤 ∈ ℝ ↦ Σ𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ((𝐹‘𝑤)‘𝑖)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (ℝ–cn→ℝ) ∧ dom (ℝ D 𝑊) = ∅) | ||
Theorem | cnndvlem2 34348* | Lemma for cnndv 34349. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 26-Aug-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ ↦ (abs‘((⌊‘(𝑥 + (1 / 2))) − 𝑥))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ (((1 / 2)↑𝑛) · (𝑇‘(((2 · 3)↑𝑛) · 𝑦))))) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑤 ∈ ℝ ↦ Σ𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ((𝐹‘𝑤)‘𝑖)) ⇒ ⊢ ∃𝑓(𝑓 ∈ (ℝ–cn→ℝ) ∧ dom (ℝ D 𝑓) = ∅) | ||
Theorem | cnndv 34349 | There exists a continuous nowhere differentiable function. The result follows directly from knoppcn 34314 and knoppndv 34344. (Contributed by Asger C. Ipsen, 26-Aug-2021.) |
⊢ ∃𝑓(𝑓 ∈ (ℝ–cn→ℝ) ∧ dom (ℝ D 𝑓) = ∅) | ||
In this mathbox, we try to respect the ordering of the sections of the main part. There are strengthenings of theorems of the main part, as well as work on reducing axiom dependencies. | ||
Miscellaneous utility theorems of propositional calculus. | ||
In this section, we prove a few rules of inference derived from modus ponens ax-mp 5, and which do not depend on any other axioms. | ||
Theorem | bj-mp2c 34350 | A double modus ponens inference. Inference associated with mpd 15. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Sep-2019.) |
⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜒 | ||
Theorem | bj-mp2d 34351 | A double modus ponens inference. Inference associated with mpcom 38. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Sep-2019.) |
⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜒 | ||
In this section, we prove a syntactic theorem (bj-0 34352) asserting that some formula is well-formed. Then, we use this syntactic theorem to shorten the proof of a "usual" theorem (bj-1 34353) and explain in the comment of that theorem why this phenomenon is unusual. | ||
Theorem | bj-0 34352 | A syntactic theorem. See the section comment and the comment of bj-1 34353. The full proof (that is, with the syntactic, non-essential steps) does not appear on this webpage. It has five steps and reads $= wph wps wi wch wi $. The only other syntactic theorems in the main part of set.mm are wel 2114 and weq 1969. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Sep-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
wff ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜒) | ||
Theorem | bj-1 34353 |
In this proof, the use of the syntactic theorem bj-0 34352
allows to reduce
the total length by one (non-essential) step. See also the section
comment and the comment of bj-0 34352. Since bj-0 34352
is used in a
non-essential step, this use does not appear on this webpage (but the
present theorem appears on the webpage for bj-0 34352
as a theorem referencing
it). The full proof reads $= wph wps wch bj-0 id $. (while, without
using bj-0 34352, it would read $= wph wps wi wch wi id $.).
Now we explain why syntactic theorems are not useful in set.mm. Suppose that the syntactic theorem thm-0 proves that PHI is a well-formed formula, and that thm-0 is used to shorten the proof of thm-1. Assume that PHI does have proper non-atomic subformulas (which is not the case of the formula proved by weq 1969 or wel 2114). Then, the proof of thm-1 does not construct all the proper non-atomic subformulas of PHI (if it did, then using thm-0 would not shorten it). Therefore, thm-1 is a special instance of a more general theorem with essentially the same proof. In the present case, bj-1 34353 is a special instance of id 22. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Sep-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜒) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜒)) | ||
Theorem | bj-a1k 34354 | Weakening of ax-1 6. As a consequence, its associated inference is an instance (where we allow extra hypotheses) of ax-1 6. Its commuted form is 2a1 28 (but bj-a1k 34354 does not require ax-2 7). This shortens the proofs of dfwe2 7509 (937>925), ordunisuc2 7572 (789>777), r111 9270 (558>545), smo11 8023 (1176>1164). (Contributed by BJ, 11-Aug-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜓))) | ||
Theorem | bj-poni 34355 | Inference associated with "pon", pm2.27 42. Its associated inference is ax-mp 5. (Contributed by BJ, 30-Jul-2024.) |
⊢ 𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜓) | ||
Theorem | bj-nnclav 34356 | When ⊥ is substituted for 𝜓, this formula is the Clavius law with a doubly negated consequent, which is therefore a minimalistic tautology. Notice the non-intuitionistic proof from peirce 205 and pm2.27 42 chained using syl 17. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Dec-2023.) |
⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜑) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | bj-nnclavi 34357 | Inference associated with bj-nnclav 34356. Its associated inference is an instance of syl 17. Notice the non-intuitionistic proof from bj-peircei 34376 and bj-poni 34355. (Contributed by BJ, 30-Jul-2024.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜑) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜓) | ||
Theorem | bj-nnclavc 34358 | Commuted form of bj-nnclav 34356. Notice the non-intuitionistic proof from bj-peircei 34376 and imim1i 63. (Contributed by BJ, 30-Jul-2024.) A proof which is shorter when compressed uses embantd 59. (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜑) → 𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | bj-nnclavci 34359 | Inference associated with bj-nnclavc 34358. Its associated inference is an instance of syl 17. Notice the non-intuitionistic proof from peirce 205 and syl 17. (Contributed by BJ, 30-Jul-2024.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜑) → 𝜓) | ||
Theorem | bj-jarrii 34360 | Inference associated with jarri 107. Contrary to it , it does not require ax-2 7, but only ax-mp 5 and ax-1 6. (Contributed by BJ, 29-Mar-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜒) & ⊢ 𝜓 ⇒ ⊢ 𝜒 | ||
Theorem | bj-imim21 34361 | The propositional function (𝜒 → (. → 𝜃)) is decreasing. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜒 → (𝜓 → 𝜃)) → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜃)))) | ||
Theorem | bj-imim21i 34362 | Inference associated with bj-imim21 34361. Its associated inference is syl5 34. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Jul-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜒 → (𝜓 → 𝜃)) → (𝜒 → (𝜑 → 𝜃))) | ||
Theorem | bj-peircestab 34363 | Over minimal implicational calculus, Peirce's law implies the double negation of the stability of any formula (that is the interpretation when ⊥ is substituted for 𝜓 and for 𝜒). Therefore, the double negation of the stability of any formula is provable in classical refutability calculus. It is also provable in intuitionistic calculus (see iset.mm/bj-nnst) but it is not provable in minimal calculus (see bj-stabpeirce 34364). (Contributed by BJ, 30-Nov-2023.) Axiom ax-3 8 is only used through Peirce's law peirce 205. (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜒) → 𝜑) → 𝜒) → 𝜒) | ||
Theorem | bj-stabpeirce 34364 | This minimal implicational calculus tautology is used in the following argument: When 𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜃, 𝜏 are replaced respectively by (𝜑 → ⊥), ⊥, 𝜑, ⊥, ⊥, the antecedent becomes ¬ ¬ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑), that is, the double negation of the stability of 𝜑. If that statement were provable in minimal calculus, then, since ⊥ plays no particular role in minimal calculus, also the statement with 𝜓 in place of ⊥ would be provable. The corresponding consequent is (((𝜓 → 𝜑) → 𝜓) → 𝜓), that is, the non-intuitionistic Peirce law. Therefore, the double negation of the stability of any formula is not provable in minimal calculus. However, it is provable both in intuitionistic calculus (see iset.mm/bj-nnst) and in classical refutability calculus (see bj-peircestab 34363). (Contributed by BJ, 30-Nov-2023.) (Revised by BJ, 30-Jul-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜒) → 𝜃) → 𝜏) → (((𝜓 → 𝜒) → 𝜃) → 𝜏)) | ||
Positive calculus is understood to be intuitionistic. | ||
Theorem | bj-syl66ib 34365 | A mixed syllogism inference derived from syl6ib 254. In addition to bj-dvelimdv1 34656, it can also shorten alexsubALTlem4 22794 (4821>4812), supsrlem 10604 (2868>2863). (Contributed by BJ, 20-Oct-2021.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝜃 → 𝜏) & ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) | ||
Theorem | bj-orim2 34366 | Proof of orim2 967 from the axiomatic definition of disjunction (olc 867, orc 866, jao 960) and minimal implicational calculus. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Apr-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜒 ∨ 𝜑) → (𝜒 ∨ 𝜓))) | ||
Theorem | bj-currypeirce 34367 | Curry's axiom curryax 893 (a non-intuitionistic positive statement sometimes called a paradox of material implication) implies Peirce's axiom peirce 205 over minimal implicational calculus and the axiomatic definition of disjunction (actually, only the elimination axiom jao 960 via its inference form jaoi 856; the introduction axioms olc 867 and orc 866 are not needed). Note that this theorem shows that actually, the standard instance of curryax 893 implies the standard instance of peirce 205, which is not the case for the converse bj-peircecurry 34368. (Contributed by BJ, 15-Jun-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ (𝜑 → 𝜓)) → (((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜑) → 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | bj-peircecurry 34368 | Peirce's axiom peirce 205 implies Curry's axiom curryax 893 over minimal implicational calculus and the axiomatic definition of disjunction (actually, only the introduction axioms olc 867 and orc 866; the elimination axiom jao 960 is not needed). See bj-currypeirce 34367 for the converse. (Contributed by BJ, 15-Jun-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 ∨ (𝜑 → 𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | bj-animbi 34369 | Conjunction in terms of implication and biconditional. Note that the proof is intuitionistic (use of ax-3 8 comes from the unusual definition of the biconditional in set.mm). (Contributed by BJ, 23-Sep-2023.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜑 → 𝜓))) | ||
Theorem | bj-currypara 34370 | Curry's paradox. Note that the proof is intuitionistic (use ax-3 8 comes from the unusual definition of the biconditional in set.mm). The paradox comes from the case where 𝜑 is the self-referential sentence "If this sentence is true, then 𝜓", so that one can prove everything. Therefore, a consistent system cannot allow the formation of such self-referential sentences. This has lead to the study of logics rejecting contraction pm2.43 56, such as affine logic and linear logic. (Contributed by BJ, 23-Sep-2023.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ (𝜑 → 𝜓)) → 𝜓) | ||
Theorem | bj-con2com 34371 | A commuted form of the contrapositive, true in minimal calculus. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Mar-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 → ¬ 𝜑) → ¬ 𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | bj-con2comi 34372 | Inference associated with bj-con2com 34371. Its associated inference is mt2 203. TODO: when in the main part, add to mt2 203 that it is the inference associated with bj-con2comi 34372. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Mar-2020.) |
⊢ 𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜓 → ¬ 𝜑) → ¬ 𝜓) | ||
Theorem | bj-pm2.01i 34373 | Inference associated with the weak Clavius law pm2.01 192. (Contributed by BJ, 30-Mar-2020.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜑) ⇒ ⊢ ¬ 𝜑 | ||
Theorem | bj-nimn 34374 | If a formula is true, then it does not imply its negation. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Mar-2020.) A shorter proof is possible using id 22 and jc 164, however, the present proof uses theorems that are more basic than jc 164. (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | bj-nimni 34375 | Inference associated with bj-nimn 34374. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Mar-2020.) |
⊢ 𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ ¬ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜑) | ||
Theorem | bj-peircei 34376 | Inference associated with peirce 205. (Contributed by BJ, 30-Mar-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜑) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜑 | ||
Theorem | bj-looinvi 34377 | Inference associated with looinv 206. Its associated inference is bj-looinvii 34378. (Contributed by BJ, 30-Mar-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜓 → 𝜑) → 𝜑) | ||
Theorem | bj-looinvii 34378 | Inference associated with bj-looinvi 34377. (Contributed by BJ, 30-Mar-2020.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜑) ⇒ ⊢ 𝜑 | ||
A few lemmas about disjunction. The fundamental theorems in this family are the dual statements pm4.71 561 and pm4.72 949. See also biort 935 and biorf 936. | ||
Theorem | bj-jaoi1 34379 | Shortens orfa2 35856 (58>53), pm1.2 903 (20>18), pm1.2 903 (20>18), pm2.4 906 (31>25), pm2.41 907 (31>25), pm2.42 942 (38>32), pm3.2ni 880 (43>39), pm4.44 996 (55>51). (Contributed by BJ, 30-Sep-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → 𝜓) | ||
Theorem | bj-jaoi2 34380 | Shortens consensus 1052 (110>106), elnn0z 12068 (336>329), pm1.2 903 (20>19), pm3.2ni 880 (43>39), pm4.44 996 (55>51). (Contributed by BJ, 30-Sep-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜓 ∨ 𝜑) → 𝜓) | ||
A few other characterizations of the bicondional. The inter-definability of logical connectives offers many ways to express a given statement. Some useful theorems in this regard are df-or 847, df-an 400, pm4.64 848, imor 852, pm4.62 855 through pm4.67 402, and, for the De Morgan laws, ianor 981 through pm4.57 990. | ||
Theorem | bj-dfbi4 34381 | Alternate definition of the biconditional. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Oct-2019.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∨ ¬ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))) | ||
Theorem | bj-dfbi5 34382 | Alternate definition of the biconditional. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Oct-2019.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))) | ||
Theorem | bj-dfbi6 34383 | Alternate definition of the biconditional. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Oct-2019.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))) | ||
Theorem | bj-bijust0ALT 34384 | Alternate proof of bijust0 207; shorter but using additional intermediate results. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Josh Purinton, 29-Dec-2000.) (Revised by BJ, 19-Mar-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ¬ ((𝜑 → 𝜑) → ¬ (𝜑 → 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | bj-bijust00 34385 | A self-implication does not imply the negation of a self-implication. Most general theorem of which bijust 208 is an instance (bijust0 207 and bj-bijust0ALT 34384 are therefore also instances of it). (Contributed by BJ, 7-Sep-2022.) |
⊢ ¬ ((𝜑 → 𝜑) → ¬ (𝜓 → 𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | bj-consensus 34386 | Version of consensus 1052 expressed using the conditional operator. (Remark: it may be better to express it as consensus 1052, using only binary connectives, and hinting at the fact that it is a Boolean algebra identity, like the absorption identities.) (Contributed by BJ, 30-Sep-2019.) |
⊢ ((if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒) ∨ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒)) | ||
Theorem | bj-consensusALT 34387 | Alternate proof of bj-consensus 34386. (Contributed by BJ, 30-Sep-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒) ∨ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒)) | ||
Theorem | bj-df-ifc 34388* | Candidate definition for the conditional operator for classes. This is in line with the definition of a class as the extension of a predicate in df-clab 2717. We reprove the current df-if 4412 from it in bj-dfif 34389. (Contributed by BJ, 20-Sep-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∣ if-(𝜑, 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)} | ||
Theorem | bj-dfif 34389* | Alternate definition of the conditional operator for classes, which used to be the main definition. (Contributed by BJ, 26-Dec-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∣ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∨ (¬ 𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))} | ||
Theorem | bj-ififc 34390 | A biconditional connecting the conditional operator for propositions and the conditional operator for classes. Note that there is no sethood hypothesis on 𝑋: it is implied by either side. (Contributed by BJ, 24-Sep-2019.) Generalize statement from setvar 𝑥 to class 𝑋. (Revised by BJ, 26-Dec-2023.) |
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ if(𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
Miscellaneous theorems of propositional calculus. | ||
Theorem | bj-imbi12 34391 | Uncurried (imported) form of imbi12 350. (Contributed by BJ, 6-May-2019.) |
⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) → ((𝜑 → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜓 → 𝜃))) | ||
Theorem | bj-biorfi 34392 | This should be labeled "biorfi" while the current biorfi 938 should be labeled "biorfri". The dual of biorf 936 is not biantr 806 but iba 531 (and ibar 532). So there should also be a "biorfr". (Note that these four statements can actually be strengthened to biconditionals.) (Contributed by BJ, 26-Oct-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ¬ 𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | bj-falor 34393 | Dual of truan 1553 (which has biconditional reversed). (Contributed by BJ, 26-Oct-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (⊥ ∨ 𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | bj-falor2 34394 | Dual of truan 1553. (Contributed by BJ, 26-Oct-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((⊥ ∨ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜑) | ||
Theorem | bj-bibibi 34395 | A property of the biconditional. (Contributed by BJ, 26-Oct-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))) | ||
Theorem | bj-imn3ani 34396 | Duplication of bnj1224 32344. Three-fold version of imnani 404. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Revised by BJ, 22-Oct-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
⊢ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ¬ 𝜒) | ||
Theorem | bj-andnotim 34397 | Two ways of expressing a certain ternary connective. Note the respective positions of the three formulas on each side of the biconditional. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Oct-2018.) |
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒)) | ||
Theorem | bj-bi3ant 34398 | This used to be in the main part. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 14-May-2013.) (Revised by BJ, 14-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝜃 → 𝜏) → 𝜑) → (((𝜏 → 𝜃) → 𝜓) → ((𝜃 ↔ 𝜏) → 𝜒))) | ||
Theorem | bj-bisym 34399 | This used to be in the main part. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 14-May-2013.) (Revised by BJ, 14-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) → (((𝜓 → 𝜑) → (𝜃 → 𝜒)) → ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)))) | ||
Theorem | bj-bixor 34400 | Equivalence of two ternary operations. Note the identical order and parenthesizing of the three arguments in both expressions. (Contributed by BJ, 31-Dec-2023.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ⊻ 𝜒)) ↔ (𝜑 ⊻ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |