Theorem bnj106 35364

Description: First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj106.1	⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
bnj106.2	⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj106	⊢ ([𝐹 / 𝑓][1o / 𝑛]𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑓,𝑛   𝑓,𝐹,𝑖,𝑦   𝑅,𝑓,𝑛   𝑖,𝑛,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑖, 𝑛)   𝐴(𝑦, 𝑖)   𝑅(𝑦, 𝑖)   𝐹(𝑛)

Proof of Theorem bnj106

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj106.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
2		bnj105 35221	. . . 4 ⊢ 1o ∈ V
3	1, 2	bnj92 35358	. . 3 ⊢ ([1o / 𝑛]𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
4	3	sbcbii 3798	. 2 ⊢ ([𝐹 / 𝑓][1o / 𝑛]𝜓 ↔ [𝐹 / 𝑓]∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
5		bnj106.2	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V
6		fveq1 6881	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = (𝐹‘suc 𝑖))
7		fveq1 6881	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝑓‘𝑖) = (𝐹‘𝑖))
8	7	bnj1113 35282	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))
9	6, 8	eqeq12d 2778	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → ((𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) ↔ (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
10	9	imbi2d 343	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → ((suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))))
11	10	ralbidv 3187	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))))
12	5, 11	sbcie 3783	. 2 ⊢ ([𝐹 / 𝑓]∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
13	4, 12	bitri 278	1 ⊢ ([𝐹 / 𝑓][1o / 𝑛]𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  ∀wral 3078  Vcvv 3453  [wsbc 3742  ∪ ciun 4954  suc csuc 6363  ‘cfv 6537  ωcom 7865  1_oc1o 8451   predc-bnj14 35185

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5267  ax-pow 5334

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-v 3455  df-sbc 3743  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-ss 3919  df-nul 4283  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4588  df-uni 4871  df-iun 4956  df-br 5108  df-suc 6367  df-iota 6493  df-fv 6545  df-1o 8458

This theorem is used by:  bnj126  35369