Theorem bnj106 35498

Description: First-order logic and set theory. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj106.1	⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
bnj106.2	⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj106	⊢ ([𝐹 / 𝑓][1o / 𝑛]𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑓,𝑛   𝑓,𝐹,𝑖,𝑦   𝑅,𝑓,𝑛   𝑖,𝑛,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑦, 𝑓, 𝑖, 𝑛)   𝐴(𝑦, 𝑖)   𝑅(𝑦, 𝑖)   𝐹(𝑛)

Proof of Theorem bnj106

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj106.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 𝑛 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
2		bnj105 35355	. . . 4 ⊢ 1o ∈ V
3	1, 2	bnj92 35492	. . 3 ⊢ ([1o / 𝑛]𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
4	3	sbcbii 3794	. 2 ⊢ ([𝐹 / 𝑓][1o / 𝑛]𝜓 ↔ [𝐹 / 𝑓]∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
5		bnj106.2	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V
6		fveq1 6884	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = (𝐹‘suc 𝑖))
7		fveq1 6884	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝑓‘𝑖) = (𝐹‘𝑖))
8	7	bnj1113 35416	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))
9	6, 8	eqeq12d 2776	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → ((𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅) ↔ (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
10	9	imbi2d 343	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → ((suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))))
11	10	ralbidv 3185	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅))))
12	5, 11	sbcie 3779	. 2 ⊢ ([𝐹 / 𝑓]∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → (𝑓‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑓‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))
13	4, 12	bitri 278	1 ⊢ ([𝐹 / 𝑓][1o / 𝑛]𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ ω (suc 𝑖 ∈ 1o → (𝐹‘suc 𝑖) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑖) pred(𝑦, 𝐴, 𝑅)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2144  ∀wral 3076  Vcvv 3450  [wsbc 3738  ∪ ciun 4950  suc csuc 6364  ‘cfv 6538  ωcom 7877  1_oc1o 8469   predc-bnj14 35319

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5248  ax-nul 5259  ax-pow 5326

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2099  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3739  df-ss 3896  df-dif 4047  df-un 4151  df-nul 4279  df-pw 4558  df-sn 4584  df-uni 4867  df-iun 4952  df-br 5103  df-suc 6368  df-iota 6494  df-fv 6546  df-1o 8476

This theorem is used by:  bnj126  35503