Theorem cbvrexdva 3395

Description: Rule used to change the bound variable in a restricted existential quantifier with implicit substitution. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
cbvraldva.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cbvrexdva	⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))

Distinct variable groups:   𝜓,𝑦   𝜒,𝑥   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦   𝜑,𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥)   𝜒(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem cbvrexdva

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		cbvraldva.1	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
2		eqidd 2739	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐴 = 𝐴)
3	1, 2	cbvrexdva2 3393	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 396  ∃wrex 3065

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-ext 2709

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-ex 1783  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2816  df-rex 3070

This theorem is referenced by:  tfrlem3a  8208  2sqmo  26585  trgcopy  27165  trgcopyeu  27167  acopyeu  27195  tgasa1  27219  dispcmp  31809  satffunlem1lem1  33364  satffunlem2lem1  33366  f1omptsn  35508  pibt2  35588  prjsprel  40443  opnneilem  46199