Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > cbvrexdva | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Rule used to change the bound variable in a restricted existential quantifier with implicit substitution. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
cbvraldva.1 | ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
cbvrexdva | ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | cbvraldva.1 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
2 | eqidd 2824 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐴 = 𝐴) | |
3 | 1, 2 | cbvrexdva2 3459 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 208 ∧ wa 398 ∃wrex 3141 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1796 ax-4 1810 ax-5 1911 ax-6 1970 ax-7 2015 ax-8 2116 ax-9 2124 ax-ext 2795 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 209 df-an 399 df-ex 1781 df-cleq 2816 df-clel 2895 df-rex 3146 |
This theorem is referenced by: tfrlem3a 8015 2sqmo 26015 trgcopy 26592 trgcopyeu 26594 acopyeu 26622 tgasa1 26646 dispcmp 31125 satffunlem1lem1 32651 satffunlem2lem1 32653 f1omptsn 34620 pibt2 34700 prjsprel 39261 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |