Theorem cbvrexdva 3407

Description: Rule used to change the bound variable in a restricted existential quantifier with implicit substitution. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
cbvraldva.1	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cbvrexdva	⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))

Distinct variable groups:   𝜓,𝑦   𝜒,𝑥   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦   𝜑,𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜓(𝑥)   𝜒(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem cbvrexdva

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		cbvraldva.1	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
2		eqidd 2799	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → 𝐴 = 𝐴)
3	1, 2	cbvrexdva2 3404	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 399  ∃wrex 3107

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-ext 2770

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-ex 1782  df-cleq 2791  df-clel 2870  df-rex 3112

This theorem is referenced by:  tfrlem3a  7996  2sqmo  26021  trgcopy  26598  trgcopyeu  26600  acopyeu  26628  tgasa1  26652  dispcmp  31212  satffunlem1lem1  32762  satffunlem2lem1  32764  f1omptsn  34754  pibt2  34834  prjsprel  39598