| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > tfrlem3a | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Lemma for transfinite recursion. Let 𝐴 be the class of "acceptable" functions. The final thing we're interested in is the union of all these acceptable functions. This lemma just changes some bound variables in 𝐴 for later use. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1995.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| tfrlem3.1 | ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))} |
| tfrlem3.2 | ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ V |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| tfrlem3a | ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝐺 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝐺‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝐺 ↾ 𝑤)))) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | tfrlem3.2 | . 2 ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ V | |
| 2 | fneq12 6632 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ↔ 𝐺 Fn 𝑧)) | |
| 3 | simpll 778 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑓 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝑓 = 𝐺) | |
| 4 | simpr 489 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑓 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝑦 = 𝑤) | |
| 5 | 3, 4 | fveq12d 6889 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑓 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐺‘𝑤)) |
| 6 | 3, 4 | reseq12d 5980 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑓 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → (𝑓 ↾ 𝑦) = (𝐺 ↾ 𝑤)) |
| 7 | 6 | fveq2d 6886 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑓 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)) = (𝐹‘(𝐺 ↾ 𝑤))) |
| 8 | 5, 7 | eqeq12d 2785 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑓 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → ((𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)) ↔ (𝐺‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝐺 ↾ 𝑤)))) |
| 9 | simplr 780 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑓 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝑥 = 𝑧) | |
| 10 | 8, 9 | cbvraldva2 3347 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)) ↔ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝐺‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝐺 ↾ 𝑤)))) |
| 11 | 2, 10 | anbi12d 643 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → ((𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦))) ↔ (𝐺 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝐺‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝐺 ↾ 𝑤))))) |
| 12 | 11 | cbvrexdva 3252 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐺 → (∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦))) ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝐺 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝐺‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝐺 ↾ 𝑤))))) |
| 13 | tfrlem3.1 | . 2 ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))} | |
| 14 | 1, 12, 13 | elab2 3650 | 1 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝐺 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝐺‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝐺 ↾ 𝑤)))) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 400 = wceq 1567 ∈ wcel 2149 {cab 2747 ∀wral 3085 ∃wrex 3095 Vcvv 3463 ↾ cres 5664 Oncon0 6361 Fn wfn 6532 ‘cfv 6537 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1822 ax-4 1836 ax-5 1937 ax-6 1994 ax-7 2035 ax-8 2151 ax-9 2159 ax-ext 2741 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 401 df-or 861 df-3an 1103 df-tru 1570 df-fal 1580 df-ex 1807 df-sb 2098 df-clab 2748 df-cleq 2761 df-clel 2844 df-ral 3086 df-rex 3096 df-rab 3424 df-v 3465 df-dif 3916 df-un 3918 df-in 3920 df-ss 3930 df-nul 4295 df-if 4493 df-sn 4595 df-pr 4597 df-op 4601 df-uni 4877 df-br 5114 df-opab 5178 df-xp 5668 df-rel 5669 df-cnv 5670 df-co 5671 df-dm 5672 df-res 5674 df-iota 6493 df-fun 6539 df-fn 6540 df-fv 6545 |
| This theorem is referenced by: tfrlem3 8363 tfrlem5 8365 tfrlem9a 8372 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |