Theorem cdleme3d 36306

Description: Part of proof of Lemma E in [Crawley] p. 113. Lemma leading to cdleme3fa 36311 and cdleme3 36312. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-2012.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
cdleme1.l	⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
cdleme1.j	⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)
cdleme1.m	⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)
cdleme1.a	⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)
cdleme1.h	⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)
cdleme1.u	⊢ 𝑈 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑊)
cdleme1.f	⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))
cdleme3.3	⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cdleme3d	⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑉))

Proof of Theorem cdleme3d

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		cdleme1.f	. 2 ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))
2		cdleme3.3	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)
3	2	oveq2i 6916	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑉) = (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊))
4	3	oveq2i 6916	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑉)) = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑊)))
5	1, 4	eqtr4i 2852	1 ⊢ 𝐹 = ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑉))

Syntax hints:   = wceq 1658  ‘cfv 6123  (class class class)co 6905  lecple 16312  joincjn 17297  meetcmee 17298  Atomscatm 35338  LHypclh 36059

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1896  ax-4 1910  ax-5 2011  ax-6 2077  ax-7 2114  ax-9 2175  ax-10 2194  ax-11 2209  ax-12 2222  ax-13 2391  ax-ext 2803

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 199  df-an 387  df-or 881  df-3an 1115  df-tru 1662  df-ex 1881  df-nf 1885  df-sb 2070  df-clab 2812  df-cleq 2818  df-clel 2821  df-nfc 2958  df-rex 3123  df-rab 3126  df-v 3416  df-dif 3801  df-un 3803  df-in 3805  df-ss 3812  df-nul 4145  df-if 4307  df-sn 4398  df-pr 4400  df-op 4404  df-uni 4659  df-br 4874  df-iota 6086  df-fv 6131  df-ov 6908

This theorem is referenced by:  cdleme3g  36309  cdleme3h  36310  cdleme9  36328