| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 398 of 507) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31307) |
(31308-32830) |
(32831-50694) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Axiom | ax-c10 39701 |
A variant of ax6 2419. Axiom scheme C10' in [Megill] p. 448 (p. 16 of the
preprint).
This axiom is obsolete and should no longer be used. It is proved above as Theorem axc10 2420. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1993.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → 𝜑) | ||
| Axiom | ax-c11 39702 |
Axiom ax-c11 39702 was the original version of ax-c11n 39703 ("n" for "new"),
before it was discovered (in May 2008) that the shorter ax-c11n 39703 could
replace it. It appears as Axiom scheme C11' in [Megill] p. 448 (p. 16 of
the preprint).
This axiom is obsolete and should no longer be used. It is proved above as Theorem axc11 2465. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1993.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑)) | ||
| Axiom | ax-c11n 39703 |
Axiom of Quantifier Substitution. One of the equality and substitution
axioms of predicate calculus with equality. Appears as Lemma L12 in
[Megill] p. 445 (p. 12 of the preprint).
The original version of this axiom was ax-c11 39702 and was replaced with this shorter ax-c11n 39703 ("n" for "new") in May 2008. The old axiom is proved from this one as Theorem axc11 2465. Conversely, this axiom is proved from ax-c11 39702 as Theorem axc11nfromc11 39741. This axiom was proved redundant in July 2015. See Theorem axc11n 2461. This axiom is obsolete and should no longer be used. It is proved above as Theorem axc11n 2461. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-2008.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥) | ||
| Axiom | ax-c15 39704 |
Axiom ax-c15 39704 was the original version of ax-12 2216, before it was
discovered (in Jan. 2007) that the shorter ax-12 2216 could replace it. It
appears as Axiom scheme C15' in [Megill]
p. 448 (p. 16 of the preprint).
It is based on Lemma 16 of [Tarski] p. 70
and Axiom C8 of [Monk2] p. 105,
from which it can be proved by cases. To understand this theorem more
easily, think of "¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 →..." as informally meaning
"if
𝑥 and 𝑦 are distinct variables
then..." The antecedent becomes
false if the same variable is substituted for 𝑥 and 𝑦,
ensuring
the theorem is sound whenever this is the case. In some later theorems,
we call an antecedent of the form ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦 a "distinctor".
Interestingly, if the wff expression substituted for 𝜑 contains no wff variables, the resulting statement can be proved without invoking this axiom. This means that even though this axiom is metalogically independent from the others, it is not logically independent. Specifically, we can prove any wff-variable-free instance of Axiom ax-c15 39704 (from which the ax-12 2216 instance follows by Theorem ax12 2458.) The proof is by induction on formula length, using ax12eq 39756 and ax12el 39757 for the basis steps and ax12indn 39758, ax12indi 39759, and ax12inda 39763 for the induction steps. (This paragraph is true provided we use ax-c11 39702 in place of ax-c11n 39703.) This axiom is obsolete and should no longer be used. It is proved above as Theorem axc15 2457, which should be used instead. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1993.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)))) | ||
| Axiom | ax-c9 39705 |
Axiom of Quantifier Introduction. One of the equality and substitution
axioms of predicate calculus with equality. Informally, it says that
whenever 𝑧 is distinct from 𝑥 and
𝑦,
and 𝑥 =
𝑦 is true,
then 𝑥 = 𝑦 quantified with 𝑧 is also
true. In other words, 𝑧
is irrelevant to the truth of 𝑥 = 𝑦. Axiom scheme C9' in [Megill]
p. 448 (p. 16 of the preprint). It apparently does not otherwise appear
in the literature but is easily proved from textbook predicate calculus by
cases.
This axiom is obsolete and should no longer be used. It is proved above as Theorem axc9 2417. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1993.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 → (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑧 𝑥 = 𝑦))) | ||
| Axiom | ax-c14 39706 |
Axiom of Quantifier Introduction. One of the equality and substitution
axioms for a non-logical predicate in our predicate calculus with
equality. Axiom scheme C14' in [Megill]
p. 448 (p. 16 of the preprint).
It is redundant if we include ax-5 1943; see Theorem axc14 2498. Alternately,
ax-5 1943 becomes unnecessary in principle with this
axiom, but we lose the
more powerful metalogic afforded by ax-5 1943.
We retain ax-c14 39706 here to
provide completeness for systems with the simpler metalogic that results
from omitting ax-5 1943, which might be easier to study for some
theoretical
purposes.
This axiom is obsolete and should no longer be used. It is proved above as Theorem axc14 2498. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-1993.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 → (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∀𝑧 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦))) | ||
| Axiom | ax-c16 39707* |
Axiom of Distinct Variables. The only axiom of predicate calculus
requiring that variables be distinct (if we consider ax-5 1943
to be a
metatheorem and not an axiom). Axiom scheme C16' in [Megill] p. 448 (p.
16 of the preprint). It apparently does not otherwise appear in the
literature but is easily proved from textbook predicate calculus by
cases. It is a somewhat bizarre axiom since the antecedent is always
false in set theory (see dtru 5423), but nonetheless it is technically
necessary as you can see from its uses.
This axiom is redundant if we include ax-5 1943; see Theorem axc16 2300. Alternately, ax-5 1943 becomes logically redundant in the presence of this axiom, but without ax-5 1943 we lose the more powerful metalogic that results from being able to express the concept of a setvar variable not occurring in a wff (as opposed to just two setvar variables being distinct). We retain ax-c16 39707 here to provide logical completeness for systems with the simpler metalogic that results from omitting ax-5 1943, which might be easier to study for some theoretical purposes. This axiom is obsolete and should no longer be used. It is proved above as Theorem axc16 2300. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1993.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)) | ||
Theorems ax12fromc15 39720 and ax13fromc9 39721 require some intermediate theorems that are included in this section. | ||
| Theorem | axc5 39708 | This theorem repeats sp 2222 under the name axc5 39708, so that the Metamath program "MM> VERIFY MARKUP" command will check that it matches axiom scheme ax-c5 39698. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) Use sp 2222 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | ax4fromc4 39709 | Rederivation of Axiom ax-4 1842 from ax-c4 39699, ax-c5 39698, ax-gen 1828 and minimal implicational calculus { ax-mp 5, ax-1 6, ax-2 7 }. See axc4 2357 for the derivation of ax-c4 39699 from ax-4 1842. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-2008.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) Use ax-4 1842 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | ax10fromc7 39710 | Rederivation of Axiom ax-10 2179 from ax-c7 39700, ax-c4 39699, ax-c5 39698, ax-gen 1828 and propositional calculus. See axc7 2353 for the derivation of ax-c7 39700 from ax-10 2179. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-2008.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) Use ax-10 2179 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ¬ ∀𝑥𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | ax6fromc10 39711 | Rederivation of Axiom ax-6 2000 from ax-c7 39700, ax-c10 39701, ax-gen 1828 and propositional calculus. See axc10 2420 for the derivation of ax-c10 39701 from ax-6 2000. Lemma L18 in [Megill] p. 446 (p. 14 of the preprint). (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1993.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) Use ax-6 2000 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ¬ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 | ||
| Theorem | hba1-o 39712 | The setvar 𝑥 is not free in ∀𝑥𝜑. Example in Appendix in [Megill] p. 450 (p. 19 of the preprint). Also Lemma 22 of [Monk2] p. 114. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jan-1993.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑥𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | axc4i-o 39713 | Inference version of ax-c4 39699. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-1993.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | equid1 39714 | Proof of equid 2045 from our older axioms. This is often an axiom of equality in textbook systems, but we don't need it as an axiom since it can be proved from our other axioms (although the proof, as you can see below, is not as obvious as you might think). This proof uses only axioms without distinct variable conditions and requires no dummy variables. A simpler proof, similar to Tarski's, is possible if we make use of ax-5 1943; see the proof of equid 2045. See equid1ALT 39740 for an alternate proof. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1993.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑥 = 𝑥 | ||
| Theorem | equcomi1 39715 | Proof of equcomi 2050 from equid1 39714, avoiding use of ax-5 1943 (the only use of ax-5 1943 is via ax7 2049, so using ax-7 2041 instead would remove dependency on ax-5 1943). (Contributed by BJ, 8-Jul-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑦 = 𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | aecom-o 39716 | Commutation law for identical variable specifiers. The antecedent and consequent are true when 𝑥 and 𝑦 are substituted with the same variable. Lemma L12 in [Megill] p. 445 (p. 12 of the preprint). Version of aecom 2462 using ax-c11 39702. Unlike axc11nfromc11 39741, this version does not require ax-5 1943 (see comment of equcomi1 39715). (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1993.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | aecoms-o 39717 | A commutation rule for identical variable specifiers. Version of aecoms 2463 using ax-c11 39702. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1993.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | hbae-o 39718 | All variables are effectively bound in an identical variable specifier. Version of hbae 2466 using ax-c11 39702. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1993.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑧∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) | ||
| Theorem | dral1-o 39719 | Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. Part of Theorem 9.4 of [Megill] p. 448 (p. 16 of preprint). Version of dral1 2474 using ax-c11 39702. (Contributed by NM, 24-Nov-1994.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | ax12fromc15 39720 |
Rederivation of Axiom ax-12 2216 from ax-c15 39704, ax-c11 39702 (used through
dral1-o 39719), and other older axioms. See Theorem axc15 2457 for the
derivation of ax-c15 39704 from ax-12 2216.
An open problem is whether we can prove this using ax-c11n 39703 instead of ax-c11 39702. This proof uses newer axioms ax-4 1842 and ax-6 2000, but since these are proved from the older axioms above, this is acceptable and lets us avoid having to reprove several earlier theorems to use ax-c4 39699 and ax-c10 39701. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jan-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))) | ||
| Theorem | ax13fromc9 39721 |
Derive ax-13 2407 from ax-c9 39705 and other older axioms.
This proof uses newer axioms ax-4 1842 and ax-6 2000, but since these are proved from the older axioms above, this is acceptable and lets us avoid having to reprove several earlier theorems to use ax-c4 39699 and ax-c10 39701. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑧)) | ||
These theorems were mostly intended to study properties of the older axiom schemes and are not useful outside of this section. They should not be used outside of this section. They may be deleted when they are deemed to no longer be of interest. | ||
| Theorem | ax5ALT 39722* |
Axiom to quantify a variable over a formula in which it does not occur.
Axiom C5 in [Megill] p. 444 (p. 11 of
the preprint). Also appears as
Axiom B6 (p. 75) of system S2 of [Tarski] p. 77 and Axiom C5-1 of
[Monk2] p. 113.
(This theorem simply repeats ax-5 1943 so that we can include the following note, which applies only to the obsolete axiomatization.) This axiom is logically redundant in the (logically complete) predicate calculus axiom system consisting of ax-gen 1828, ax-c4 39699, ax-c5 39698, ax-11 2195, ax-c7 39700, ax-7 2041, ax-c9 39705, ax-c10 39701, ax-c11 39702, ax-8 2148, ax-9 2156, ax-c14 39706, ax-c15 39704, and ax-c16 39707: in that system, we can derive any instance of ax-5 1943 not containing wff variables by induction on formula length, using ax5eq 39747 and ax5el 39752 for the basis together with hbn 2333, hbal 2205, and hbim 2337. However, if we omit this axiom, our development would be quite inconvenient since we could work only with specific instances of wffs containing no wff variables - this axiom introduces the concept of a setvar variable not occurring in a wff (as opposed to just two setvar variables being distinct). (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2017.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sps-o 39723 | Generalization of antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jan-1993.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | hbequid 39724 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for 𝑥 = 𝑥. This theorem tells us that any variable, including 𝑥, is effectively not free in 𝑥 = 𝑥, even though 𝑥 is technically free according to the traditional definition of free variable. (The proof does not use ax-c10 39701.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Jan-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Mar-2014.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑥 → ∀𝑦 𝑥 = 𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | nfequid-o 39725 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for 𝑥 = 𝑥. This theorem tells us that any variable, including 𝑥, is effectively not free in 𝑥 = 𝑥, even though 𝑥 is technically free according to the traditional definition of free variable. (The proof uses only ax-4 1842, ax-7 2041, ax-c9 39705, and ax-gen 1828. This shows that this can be proved without ax6 2419, even though Theorem equid 2045 cannot. A shorter proof using ax6 2419 is obtainable from equid 2045 and hbth 1836.) Remark added 2-Dec-2015 NM: This proof does implicitly use ax6v 2001, which is used for the derivation of axc9 2417, unless we consider ax-c9 39705 the starting axiom rather than ax-13 2407. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jan-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦 𝑥 = 𝑥 | ||
| Theorem | axc5c7 39726 | Proof of a single axiom that can replace ax-c5 39698 and ax-c7 39700. See axc5c7toc5 39727 and axc5c7toc7 39728 for the rederivation of those axioms. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Sep-2005.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((∀𝑥 ¬ ∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | axc5c7toc5 39727 | Rederivation of ax-c5 39698 from axc5c7 39726. Only propositional calculus is used for the rederivation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Sep-2005.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | axc5c7toc7 39728 | Rederivation of ax-c7 39700 from axc5c7 39726. Only propositional calculus is used for the rederivation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 12-Sep-2005.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 ¬ ∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | axc711 39729 | Proof of a single axiom that can replace both ax-c7 39700 and ax-11 2195. See axc711toc7 39731 and axc711to11 39732 for the rederivation of those axioms. (Contributed by NM, 18-Nov-2006.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 ¬ ∀𝑦∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | nfa1-o 39730 | 𝑥 is not free in ∀𝑥𝜑. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑥𝜑 | ||
| Theorem | axc711toc7 39731 | Rederivation of ax-c7 39700 from axc711 39729. Note that ax-c7 39700 and ax-11 2195 are not used by the rederivation. (Contributed by NM, 18-Nov-2006.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 ¬ ∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | axc711to11 39732 | Rederivation of ax-11 2195 from axc711 39729. Note that ax-c7 39700 and ax-11 2195 are not used by the rederivation. (Contributed by NM, 18-Nov-2006.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑦∀𝑥𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | axc5c711 39733 | Proof of a single axiom that can replace ax-c5 39698, ax-c7 39700, and ax-11 2195 in a subsystem that includes these axioms plus ax-c4 39699 and ax-gen 1828 (and propositional calculus). See axc5c711toc5 39734, axc5c711toc7 39735, and axc5c711to11 39736 for the rederivation of those axioms. This theorem extends the idea in Scott Fenton's axc5c7 39726. (Contributed by NM, 18-Nov-2006.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((∀𝑥∀𝑦 ¬ ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | axc5c711toc5 39734 | Rederivation of ax-c5 39698 from axc5c711 39733. Only propositional calculus is used by the rederivation. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-2006.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | axc5c711toc7 39735 | Rederivation of ax-c7 39700 from axc5c711 39733. Note that ax-c7 39700 and ax-11 2195 are not used by the rederivation. The use of alimi 1844 (which uses ax-c5 39698) is allowed since we have already proved axc5c711toc5 39734. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-2006.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 ¬ ∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | axc5c711to11 39736 | Rederivation of ax-11 2195 from axc5c711 39733. Note that ax-c7 39700 and ax-11 2195 are not used by the rederivation. The use of alimi 1844 (which uses ax-c5 39698) is allowed since we have already proved axc5c711toc5 39734. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-2006.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑦∀𝑥𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | equidqe 39737 | equid 2045 with existential quantifier without using ax-c5 39698 or ax-5 1943. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jan-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 27-Feb-2014.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ¬ ∀𝑦 ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑥 | ||
| Theorem | axc5sp1 39738 | A special case of ax-c5 39698 without using ax-c5 39698 or ax-5 1943. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jan-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑦 ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑥 → ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | equidq 39739 | equid 2045 with universal quantifier without using ax-c5 39698 or ax-5 1943. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jan-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ∀𝑦 𝑥 = 𝑥 | ||
| Theorem | equid1ALT 39740 | Alternate proof of equid 2045 and equid1 39714 from older axioms ax-c7 39700, ax-c10 39701 and ax-c9 39705. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1993.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑥 = 𝑥 | ||
| Theorem | axc11nfromc11 39741 |
Rederivation of ax-c11n 39703 from original version ax-c11 39702. See Theorem
axc11 2465 for the derivation of ax-c11 39702 from ax-c11n 39703.
This theorem should not be referenced in any proof. Instead, use ax-c11n 39703 above so that uses of ax-c11n 39703 can be more easily identified, or use aecom-o 39716 when this form is needed for studies involving ax-c11 39702 and omitting ax-5 1943. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-2008.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | naecoms-o 39742 | A commutation rule for distinct variable specifiers. Version of naecoms 2464 using ax-c11 39702. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | hbnae-o 39743 | All variables are effectively bound in a distinct variable specifier. Lemma L19 in [Megill] p. 446 (p. 14 of the preprint). Version of hbnae 2467 using ax-c11 39702. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1993.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑧 ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦) | ||
| Theorem | dvelimf-o 39744 | Proof of dvelimh 2485 that uses ax-c11 39702 but not ax-c15 39704, ax-c11n 39703, or ax-12 2216. Version of dvelimh 2485 using ax-c11 39702 instead of axc11 2465. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-2002.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) & ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑧𝜓) & ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | dral2-o 39745 | Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. Part of Theorem 9.4 of [Megill] p. 448 (p. 16 of preprint). Version of dral2 2473 using ax-c11 39702. (Contributed by NM, 27-Feb-2005.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑧𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | aev-o 39746* | A "distinctor elimination" lemma with no disjoint variable conditions on variables in the consequent, proved without using ax-c16 39707. Version of aev 2092 using ax-c11 39702. (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 21-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑧 𝑤 = 𝑣) | ||
| Theorem | ax5eq 39747* | Theorem to add distinct quantifier to atomic formula. (This theorem demonstrates the induction basis for ax-5 1943 considered as a metatheorem. Do not use it for later proofs - use ax-5 1943 instead, to avoid reference to the redundant axiom ax-c16 39707.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1993.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑧 𝑥 = 𝑦) | ||
| Theorem | dveeq2-o 39748* | Quantifier introduction when one pair of variables is distinct. Version of dveeq2 2413 using ax-c15 39704. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥 𝑧 = 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | axc16g-o 39749* | A generalization of Axiom ax-c16 39707. Version of axc16g 2299 using ax-c11 39702. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | dveeq1-o 39750* | Quantifier introduction when one pair of variables is distinct. Version of dveeq1 2415 using ax-c11 . (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑧)) | ||
| Theorem | dveeq1-o16 39751* | Version of dveeq1 2415 using ax-c16 39707 instead of ax-5 1943. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2008.) TODO: Recover proof from older set.mm to remove use of ax-5 1943. (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑧)) | ||
| Theorem | ax5el 39752* | Theorem to add distinct quantifier to atomic formula. This theorem demonstrates the induction basis for ax-5 1943 considered as a metatheorem.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-1993.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → ∀𝑧 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦) | ||
| Theorem | axc11n-16 39753* | This theorem shows that, given ax-c16 39707, we can derive a version of ax-c11n 39703. However, it is weaker than ax-c11n 39703 because it has a distinct variable requirement. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 27-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | dveel2ALT 39754* | Alternate proof of dveel2 2497 using ax-c16 39707 instead of ax-5 1943. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-2008.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 → ∀𝑥 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | ax12f 39755 | Basis step for constructing a substitution instance of ax-c15 39704 without using ax-c15 39704. We can start with any formula 𝜑 in which 𝑥 is not free. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)))) | ||
| Theorem | ax12eq 39756 | Basis step for constructing a substitution instance of ax-c15 39704 without using ax-c15 39704. Atomic formula for equality predicate. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jan-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 = 𝑤 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑧 = 𝑤)))) | ||
| Theorem | ax12el 39757 | Basis step for constructing a substitution instance of ax-c15 39704 without using ax-c15 39704. Atomic formula for membership predicate. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jan-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑤)))) | ||
| Theorem | ax12indn 39758 | Induction step for constructing a substitution instance of ax-c15 39704 without using ax-c15 39704. Negation case. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)))) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ¬ 𝜑)))) | ||
| Theorem | ax12indi 39759 | Induction step for constructing a substitution instance of ax-c15 39704 without using ax-c15 39704. Implication case. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)))) & ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜓)))) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))))) | ||
| Theorem | ax12indalem 39760 | Lemma for ax12inda2 39762 and ax12inda 39763. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jan-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)))) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑧 → (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑧𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑧𝜑))))) | ||
| Theorem | ax12inda2ALT 39761* | Alternate proof of ax12inda2 39762, slightly more direct and not requiring ax-c16 39707. (Contributed by NM, 4-May-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)))) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑧𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑧𝜑)))) | ||
| Theorem | ax12inda2 39762* | Induction step for constructing a substitution instance of ax-c15 39704 without using ax-c15 39704. Quantification case. When 𝑧 and 𝑦 are distinct, this theorem avoids the dummy variables needed by the more general ax12inda 39763. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jan-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)))) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑧𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑧𝜑)))) | ||
| Theorem | ax12inda 39763* | Induction step for constructing a substitution instance of ax-c15 39704 without using ax-c15 39704. Quantification case. (When 𝑧 and 𝑦 are distinct, ax12inda2 39762 may be used instead to avoid the dummy variable 𝑤 in the proof.) (Contributed by NM, 24-Jan-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑤 → (𝑥 = 𝑤 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑤 → 𝜑)))) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑧𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑧𝜑)))) | ||
| Theorem | ax12v2-o 39764* | Rederivation of ax-c15 39704 from ax12v 2217 (without using ax-c15 39704 or the full ax-12 2216). Thus, the hypothesis (ax12v 2217) provides an alternate axiom that can be used in place of ax-c15 39704. See also axc15 2457. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝜑))) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)))) | ||
| Theorem | ax12a2-o 39765* | Derive ax-c15 39704 from a hypothesis in the form of ax-12 2216, without using ax-12 2216 or ax-c15 39704. The hypothesis is weaker than ax-12 2216, with 𝑧 both distinct from 𝑥 and not occurring in 𝜑. Thus, the hypothesis provides an alternate axiom that can be used in place of ax-12 2216, if we also have ax-c11 39702, which this proof uses. As Theorem ax12 2458 shows, the distinct variable conditions are optional. An open problem is whether we can derive this with ax-c11n 39703 instead of ax-c11 39702. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (∀𝑧𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝜑))) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)))) | ||
| Theorem | axc11-o 39766 |
Show that ax-c11 39702 can be derived from ax-c11n 39703 and ax-12 2216. An open
problem is whether this theorem can be derived from ax-c11n 39703 and the
others when ax-12 2216 is replaced with ax-c15 39704 or ax12v 2217. See Theorems
axc11nfromc11 39741 for the rederivation of ax-c11n 39703 from axc11 2465.
Normally, axc11 2465 should be used rather than ax-c11 39702 or axc11-o 39766, except by theorems specifically studying the latter's properties. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-2008.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | fsumshftd 39767* | Index shift of a finite sum with a weaker "implicit substitution" hypothesis than fsumshft 15857. The proof demonstrates how this can be derived starting from from fsumshft 15857. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑗 = (𝑘 − 𝐾)) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Σ𝑗 ∈ (𝑀...𝑁)𝐴 = Σ𝑘 ∈ ((𝑀 + 𝐾)...(𝑁 + 𝐾))𝐵) | ||
| Axiom | ax-riotaBAD 39768 | Define restricted description binder. In case it doesn't exist, we return a set which is not a member of the domain of discourse 𝐴. See also comments for df-iota 6499. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) WARNING: THIS "AXIOM", WHICH IS THE OLD df-riota 7380, CONFLICTS WITH (THE NEW) df-riota 7380 AND MAKES THE SYSTEM IN set.mm INCONSISTENT. IT IS TEMPORARY AND WILL BE DELETED AFTER ALL USES ARE ELIMINATED. |
| ⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) = if(∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑, (℩𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)), (Undef‘{𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴})) | ||
| Theorem | riotaclbgBAD 39769* | Closure of restricted iota. (Contributed by NM, 28-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | riotaclbBAD 39770* | Closure of restricted iota. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | riotasvd 39771* | Deduction version of riotasv 39774. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜓 → 𝑥 = 𝐶))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐷 = 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | riotasv2d 39772* | Value of description binder 𝐷 for a single-valued class expression 𝐶(𝑦) (as in e.g. reusv2 5379). Special case of riota2f 7404. (Contributed by NM, 2-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜓 → 𝑥 = 𝐶))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐸) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐸) → 𝐶 = 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝐷 = 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | riotasv2s 39773* | The value of description binder 𝐷 for a single-valued class expression 𝐶(𝑦) (as in e.g. reusv2 5379) in the form of a substitution instance. Special case of riota2f 7404. (Contributed by NM, 3-Mar-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 6-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝐷 = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐸 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ [𝐸 / 𝑦]𝜑)) → 𝐷 = ⦋𝐸 / 𝑦⦌𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | riotasv 39774* | Value of description binder 𝐷 for a single-valued class expression 𝐶(𝑦) (as in e.g. reusv2 5379). Special case of riota2f 7404. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jan-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 6-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 → 𝑥 = 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐷 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝐷 = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | riotasv3d 39775* | A property 𝜒 holding for a representative of a single-valued class expression 𝐶(𝑦) (see e.g. reusv2 5379) also holds for its description binder 𝐷 (in the form of property 𝜃). (Contributed by NM, 5-Mar-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜓 → 𝑥 = 𝐶))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐷) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝜃) | ||
| Theorem | elimhyps 39776 | A version of elimhyp 4558 using explicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ [𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ [if(𝜑, 𝑥, 𝐵) / 𝑥]𝜑 | ||
| Theorem | dedths 39777 | A version of weak deduction theorem dedth 4551 using explicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ [if(𝜑, 𝑥, 𝐵) / 𝑥]𝜓 ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | renegclALT 39778 | Closure law for negative of reals. Demonstrates use of weak deduction theorem with explicit substitution. The proof is much longer than that of renegcl 11539. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → -𝐴 ∈ ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | elimhyps2 39779 | Generalization of elimhyps 39776 that is not useful unless we can separately prove ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ [𝐵 / 𝑥]𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ [if([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) / 𝑥]𝜑 | ||
| Theorem | dedths2 39780 | Generalization of dedths 39777 that is not useful unless we can separately prove ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ [if([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑, 𝐴, 𝐵) / 𝑥]𝜓 ⇒ ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | nfcxfrdf 39781 | A utility lemma to transfer a bound-variable hypothesis builder into a definition. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-2020.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | nfded 39782 | A deduction theorem that converts a not-free inference directly to deduction form. The first hypothesis is the hypothesis of the deduction form. The second is an equality deduction (e.g., (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → ∪ {𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑥𝑦 ∈ 𝐴} = ∪ 𝐴)) that starts from abidnf 3668. The last is assigned to the inference form (e.g., Ⅎ𝑥∪ {𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑥𝑦 ∈ 𝐴}) whose hypothesis is satisfied using nfaba1 2936. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴) & ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | nfded2 39783 | A deduction theorem that converts a not-free inference directly to deduction form. The first 2 hypotheses are the hypotheses of the deduction form. The third is an equality deduction (e.g., ((Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) → 〈{𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑥𝑦 ∈ 𝐴}, {𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑥𝑦 ∈ 𝐵}〉 = 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) for nfopd 4860) that starts from abidnf 3668. The last is assigned to the inference form (e.g., Ⅎ𝑥〈{𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑥𝑦 ∈ 𝐴}, {𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑥𝑦 ∈ 𝐵}〉 for nfop 4859) whose hypotheses are satisfied using nfaba1 2936. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) & ⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ∧ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | nfunidALT2 39784 | Deduction version of nfuni 4884. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∪ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | nfunidALT 39785 | Deduction version of nfuni 4884. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∪ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | nfopdALT 39786 | Deduction version of bound-variable hypothesis builder nfop 4859. This shows how the deduction version of a not-free theorem such as nfop 4859 can be created from the corresponding not-free inference theorem. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) | ||
| Theorem | cnaddcom 39787 | Recover the commutative law of addition for complex numbers from the Abelian group structure. (Contributed by NM, 17-Mar-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | toycom 39788* | Show the commutative law for an operation 𝑂 on a toy structure class 𝐶 of commutative operations on ℂ. This illustrates how a structure class can be partially specialized. In practice, we would ordinarily define a new constant such as "CAbel" in place of 𝐶. (Contributed by NM, 17-Mar-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑔 ∈ Abel ∣ (Base‘𝑔) = ℂ} & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐵 + 𝐴)) | ||
| Syntax | clsa 39789 | Extend class notation with all 1-dim subspaces (atoms) of a left module or left vector space. |
| class LSAtoms | ||
| Syntax | clsh 39790 | Extend class notation with all subspaces of a left module or left vector space that are hyperplanes. |
| class LSHyp | ||
| Definition | df-lsatoms 39791* | Define the set of all 1-dim subspaces (atoms) of a left module or left vector space. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ LSAtoms = (𝑤 ∈ V ↦ ran (𝑣 ∈ ((Base‘𝑤) ∖ {(0g‘𝑤)}) ↦ ((LSpan‘𝑤)‘{𝑣}))) | ||
| Definition | df-lshyp 39792* | Define the set of all hyperplanes of a left module or left vector space. Also called co-atoms, these are subspaces that are one dimension less than the full space. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ LSHyp = (𝑤 ∈ V ↦ {𝑠 ∈ (LSubSp‘𝑤) ∣ (𝑠 ≠ (Base‘𝑤) ∧ ∃𝑣 ∈ (Base‘𝑤)((LSpan‘𝑤)‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = (Base‘𝑤))}) | ||
| Theorem | lshpset 39793* | The set of all hyperplanes of a left module or left vector space. The vector 𝑣 is called a generating vector for the hyperplane. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑋 → 𝐻 = {𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ∣ (𝑠 ≠ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = 𝑉)}) | ||
| Theorem | islshp 39794* | The predicate "is a hyperplane" (of a left module or left vector space). (Contributed by NM, 29-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑋 → (𝑈 ∈ 𝐻 ↔ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑈 ≠ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑁‘(𝑈 ∪ {𝑣})) = 𝑉))) | ||
| Theorem | islshpsm 39795* | Hyperplane properties expressed with subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 ∈ 𝐻 ↔ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑈 ≠ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑈 ⊕ (𝑁‘{𝑣})) = 𝑉))) | ||
| Theorem | lshplss 39796 | A hyperplane is a subspace. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | lshpne 39797 | A hyperplane is not equal to the vector space. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ≠ 𝑉) | ||
| Theorem | lshpnel 39798 | A hyperplane's generating vector does not belong to the hyperplane. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 ⊕ (𝑁‘{𝑋})) = 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈) | ||
| Theorem | lshpnelb 39799 | The subspace sum of a hyperplane and the span of an element equals the vector space iff the element is not in the hyperplane. (Contributed by NM, 2-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 ↔ (𝑈 ⊕ (𝑁‘{𝑋})) = 𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | lshpnel2N 39800 | Condition that determines a hyperplane. (Contributed by NM, 3-Oct-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ≠ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 ∈ 𝐻 ↔ (𝑈 ⊕ (𝑁‘{𝑋})) = 𝑉)) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |