Theorem nelss 3993

Description: Demonstrate by witnesses that two classes lack a subclass relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Feb-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nelss	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) → ¬ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)

Proof of Theorem nelss

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ssel 3921	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶))
2	1	com12 32	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶))
3	2	con3dimp 411	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) → ¬ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 398   ∈ wcel 2132   ⊆ wss 3895

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1805  ax-4 1819  ax-5 1920  ax-6 1977  ax-7 2018  ax-8 2134

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-ex 1790  df-clel 2827  df-ss 3912

This theorem is referenced by:  nrelvOLD  5762  ordtr3  6377  smndex2dnrinv  18924  frlmssuvc2  21816  dflringlem  33634  1arithidom  33677  tfsconcatb0  43859  clsk1indlem1  44559  mapssbi  45727  fourierdlem10  46629  salgensscntex  46856