Theorem nelss 4003

Description: Demonstrate by witnesses that two classes lack a subclass relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Feb-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nelss	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) → ¬ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)

Proof of Theorem nelss

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ssel 3931	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶))
2	1	com12 32	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶))
3	2	con3dimp 412	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) → ¬ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 399   ∈ wcel 2143   ⊆ wss 3905

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1816  ax-4 1830  ax-5 1931  ax-6 1988  ax-7 2029  ax-8 2145

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-ex 1801  df-clel 2838  df-ss 3922

This theorem is referenced by:  nrelvOLD  5774  ordtr3  6392  smndex2dnrinv  18962  frlmssuvc2  21854  dflringlem  33693  1arithidom  33736  tfsconcatb0  43926  clsk1indlem1  44626  mapssbi  45780  fourierdlem10  46682  salgensscntex  46909